Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 70, Issue 1–2, pp 57–71 | Cite as

Perpetuating Gender Inequality via the Internet? An Analysis of Women’s Presence in Spanish Online Newspapers

  • Ruth Mateos de Cabo
  • Ricardo Gimeno
  • Miryam Martínez
  • Luis López
Original Article

Abstract

This study examines women’s representation in Spanish national online newspapers. For this purpose, we developed an automatic content analysis method to analyze an extensive sample of 34,235 news articles gathered from March to May 2006. Our general objective was to investigate possible gender bias in Spanish online news. To do so we focused on three journalistic routines, one at the individual level of the reporter (gender) and two at the media routine level (sections, publication day, and article length). The results of the estimated multivariate models revealed that women are still linked to traditionally “female” sections, such as people, society, and culture. Analysis of article length and publication day showed that women appear more frequently in shorter news items and in the Sunday news, which we interpreted as indicators of male association with newsworthiness. We also found differences in gender reporting since female journalists tend to include more women in the news they report than their male peers. These results provide evidence that online newspapers continue to perpetuate underrepresentation, stereotyping, and discrimination of women in web news thereby reinforcing gender inequality.

Keywords

Online newspapers Gender representation Stereotypes Internet Automatic content analysis Equality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors are very thankful to the editor Irene H. Frieze and the anonymous referees, as well as to Juan José Güemes, David Quintana, Mª Aránzazu Mielgo, Paloma Saá, Manuela Saco, Francisco Massó and Pablo Montero for their comments and support. Authors also thank the assistants to El Escorial Summer School (UCM), the 3rd Gender Equality Workshop (Alicante Council), the XXIII AEDEM Annual Meeting, and the 10th Women’s World Conference for their comments and suggestions.

This research was initially supported by the Ministry of Employment and Women’s Affairs (Regional Government of Madrid). Professor Ruth Mateos has received financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (grant ECO2012-32554). Professor Luis López has received financial support of the Regional Government of Madrid under project CLOUDS (grant S2009-TIC-1692).

References

  1. Altés, E. (2010). ¿Quién figura en las noticias? [Who makes the news?]. Barcelona: World Association for Christian Communication.Google Scholar
  2. Altés, E., & Majó, S. (2012). Representació i tractament de les dones i el gènere en la informació sobre economia [Representation and portrayal of women and gender issues in economic information]. Barcelona: Ayuda en Acción.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, C., Bjäras, G., Tillgren, P., & Östenton, C. (2007). Local media monitoring in process evaluation. Experiences from the Stockholm Diabetes Prevention Programme. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 269–283. doi: 10.1080/10810730701266307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, C. (2004). The influence of reporter gender on source selection in newspaper stories. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 139–154. doi: 10.1177/107769900408100110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, G. (1957). The economics of discrimination (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bueno Abad, J. R. (1996). Estudio longitudinal de la presencia de la mujer en los medios de comunicación de prensa escrita [Longitudinal study of woman’s presence in written press]. Valencia: Nau Llibres.Google Scholar
  7. Burke, C., & Mazzarella, S. R. (2008). “A slightly new shade of lipstick”: Gendered mediation in internet news stories. Women's Studies in Communication, 31, 395–418. doi: 10.1080/07491409.2008.10162548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cann, D. J., & Mohr, P. B. (2001). Journalist and source gender in Australian television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 162–185. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4501_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. (2007). Barómetro. Marzo 2007 [Barometer. March 2007]. Retrieved from http://www.cis.es.
  10. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. (2012). Barómetro. Junio 2012 [Barometer. June 2012]. Retrieved from http://www.cis.es.
  11. Chang, C. H., & Kuo, S.-C. (2004). OLERA: A semi-supervised approach for web data extraction with visual support. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 19(6), 56–64. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2004.71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, R. L. (2011). Content analysis of gender roles in media: Where are we now and where should we go? Sex Roles, 64, 290–298. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9929-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Craft, S., & Wanta, W. (2004). Women in the newsroom: Influences of female editors and reporters on the news agenda. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 124–138. doi: 10.1177/107769900408100109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Swert, K., & Hooghe, M. (2010). When do women get a voice? Explaining the presence of female news sources in Belgian news broadcasts (2003–5). European Journal of Communication, 25, 69–84. doi: 10.1177/0267323109354229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Desmond, R., & Danilewicz, A. (2010). Women are on, but not in, the news: Gender roles in local television news. Sex Roles, 62, 822–829. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9686-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dolado, J., Felgueroso, F., & Jimeno, J. (2004). Where do women work?: Analyzing patterns in occupational segregation by gender. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 71–72, 293–315.Google Scholar
  17. Eliassi-Rad, T., & Shavlik, J. (2003). A system for building intelligent agents that learn to retrieve and extract information. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13, 35–88. doi: 10.1023/A:1024009718142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fagoaga, C., & Secanella, P. (1984). Umbral de presencia de las mujeres en la prensa española [Threshold of women’s presence in the Spanish press]. Madrid: Serie Estudios.Google Scholar
  19. Franquet, R., Luzón, V., & Ramajo, N. (2007). News in the principal on-line mass media: Studying gender representation. Zer: Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 12(22), 267–282.Google Scholar
  20. Freedman, E., & Fico, F. (2005). Male and female sources in newspaper coverage of male and female candidates in open races for Governor in 2002. Mass Communication & Society, 8, 257–272. doi: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0803_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallagher, M. (2006). Who makes the news? London: World Association for Christian Communication.Google Scholar
  22. Gallagher, M. (2010). Who makes the news? Global Media Monitoring Project 2010. Toronto: World Association for Christian Communication.Google Scholar
  23. Gerbner, G. (1978). The dynamics of cultural resistance. In G. Tuchman, A. Kaplan Daniels, & J. Benét (Eds.), Heart and home: Images of women in the mass media (pp. 46–50). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hausmann, R., Tyson, D. L., & Zahidi, S. (2006). The global gender gap report 2006. Geneva: Word Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  25. Hausmann, R., Tyson, D. L., & Zahidi, S. (2012). The global gender gap report 2012. Geneva: Word Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  26. Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89. doi: 10.1080/19312450709336664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hether, J., & Murphy, S. T. (2010). Sex roles in health storylines on prime time television: A content analysis. Sex Roles, 62, 810–821. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9654-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Instituto de la Mujer. (2006). Mujeres y hombres en España. [Women and men in Spain]. Madrid: Instituto de la Mujer.Google Scholar
  29. Instituto Nacional de Estadística [INE]. (2006). Encuesta de población activa 04/01/2006. [Quarterly survey of the labor market 04/01/2006]. Retrieved from http://www.ine.es/inebase.
  30. Kanter, R. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  31. Kobayashi, M., & Takeda, K. (2000). Information retrieval on the web. ACM Computing Surveys, 32, 144–173. doi: 10.1145/358923.358934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Kushmerick, N. (2000a). Wrapper induction: Efficiency and expressiveness. Artificial Intelligence, 118, 15–68. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(99)00100-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kushmerick, N. (2000b). Wrapper verification. World Wide Web Journal, 3(2), 79–94. doi: 10.1023/A:1019229612909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laender, A. H. F., Ribeiro-Neto, B. A., da Silva, A. S., & Teixeira, J. S. (2002). A brief survey of web data extraction tools. ACM SIGMOD Record, 31(2), 84–93. doi: 10.1145/565117.565137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lavie, A., & Lehman-Wilzig, S. (2003). Whose news? Does gender determine the editorial product? European Journal of Communication, 18, 5–29. doi: 10.1177/0267323103018001224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, S. (2007). International public relations as a predictor of prominence of US news coverage. Public Relations Review, 33, 158–165. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lens-Ríos, M. E., Rodgers, S., Thorson, E., & Yoon, D. (2005). Representation of women in news and photos: Comparing content to perceptions. Journal of Communication, 55, 152–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02664.x.Google Scholar
  39. Liebler, C., & Smith, S. (1997). Tracking gender differences: A comparative analysis of network correspondents and their sources. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 58–68. doi: 10.1080/08838159709364390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lombardo, E. (2008). Gender inequality in politics. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 10, 78–96. doi: 10.1080/14616740701747709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mateos, R., Gimeno, R., & Escot, L. (2011). Disentangling discrimination on Spanish boards of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19, 77–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00837.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Matud, P. M., Rodríguez, C., & Espinosa, I. (2011). Gender in Spanish daily newspapers. Sex Roles, 64, 253–264. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9874-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McMillan, S. (2000). The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 80–98. doi: 10.1177/107769900007700107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mills, K. (1997). What difference do women journalists make? In P. Norris (Ed.), Women, media and politics (pp. 41–55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Morrison, A., White, R., & Van Velsor, E. (1987). Breaking the glass ceiling. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  46. Nielsen Netview. (2006). Panel de hogar [Household panel]. Data February 2006. Madrid: Nielsen.Google Scholar
  47. Phalen, P. (2000). Pioneers, girlfriends and wives: An agenda for research on women and the organizational culture of broadcasting. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 230–247. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Phelps, E. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review, 62, 659–661.Google Scholar
  49. Powers, A., & Fico, F. (1994). Influences on use of sources at large US newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal, 15, 87–97.Google Scholar
  50. Price, C., & Wulff, S. (2005). Does sex make a difference? Job satisfaction of television network news correspondents. Women’s Studies in Communication, 28, 207–234. doi: 10.1080/07491409.2005.10162492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Riffe, D., Aust, C. F., & Lacy, S. R. (1993). The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 133–139. doi: 10.1177/107769909307000115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rodgers, S., & Thorson, E. (2003). A socialization perspective on male and female reporting. International Journal of Communication, 53, 658–675. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02916.x.Google Scholar
  53. Ross, K. (2007). The journalist, the housewife, the citizen and the press: Women and men as sources in local news narratives. Journalism, 8, 449–473. doi: 10.1177/1464884907078659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ross, K., & Carter, C. (2011). Women and news: A long and winding road. Media, Culture & Society, 33, 1148–1165. doi: 10.1177/0163443711418272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Royo-Vela, M., Aldas-Manzano, J., Küster, I., & Vila, N. (2008). Adaptation of marketing activities to cultural and social context: Gender role portrayals and sexism in Spanish commercials. Sex Roles, 58, 379–390. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9341-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rudy, R. M., Popova, L., & Linz, D. G. (2010). Content analysis [Special issue]. Sex Roles, 62, 705–847.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rudy, R. M., Popova, L., & Linz, D. G. (2011). Content analysis II [Special issue]. Sex Roles, 64, 151–298.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schmid, H. (1994). Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing (pp. 44–49). Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
  59. Schwartz, J. (2011). Whose voices are heard? Gender, sexual orientation and newspaper sources. Sex Roles, 64, 265–275. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9825-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shoemaker, P., & Reese, S. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influence on mass media content (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  61. Shoemaker, P., Eichholz, M., Kim, E., & Wrigley, B. (2001). Individual and routine forces in gatekeeping. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 233–246. doi: 10.1177/107769900107800202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Snider, P. (1967). “Mr. Gates” revisited: A 1966 version of the 1949 case study. Journalism Quarterly, 44, 419–427. doi: 10.1177/107769906704400301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Soderlund, S., Surlin, S., & Romanow, W. (1989). Gender in Canadian local television news: Anchors and reporters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 33, 187–196. doi: 10.1080/08838158909364072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stempel, G. H. (1952). Sample size for classifying subject matter in dailies. Journalism Quarterly, 29, 333–334.Google Scholar
  65. Sutcliffe, J., Lee, M., & Soderlund, W. (2005). Women and crisis reporting: Coverage of television news coverage of political crises in the Caribbean. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 99–124. doi: 10.1177/1081180X05279147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thiel, S. (2004). Shifting identities, creating new paradigms: Analyzing the narratives of women online journalists. Feminist Media Studies, 4, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tuchman, G. (1978). Introduction: The symbolic annihilation of women by the mass media. In G. Tuchman, A. Kaplan Daniels, & J. Benét (Eds.), Heart and home: Images of women in the mass media (pp. 3–38). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Valls-Fernández, F., & Martínez-Vicente, J. M. (2007). Gender stereotypes in Spanish television commercials. Sex Roles, 56, 691–699. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9208-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Zoonen, L. (1994). Feminist media studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Weaver, D., & Wilhoit, G. C. (1992). The American journalist: A portrait of US news people and their works. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  71. White, D. M. (1950). The “gatekeeper”: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27, 383–390.Google Scholar
  72. Wolfers, J. (2006). Diagnosing discrimination: Stock returns and CEO gender. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 531–541. doi: 10.1162/jeea.2006.4.2-3.531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yun, H. J., Postelnicu, M., Ramoutar, N., & Kaid, L. L. (2007). Where is she? Coverage of women in online news magazines. Journalism Studies, 8, 930–947. doi: 10.1080/14616700701556823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zeldes, G. A., & Fico, F. (2005). Race and gender: An analysis of sources and reporters in the network’s coverage of the 2000 presidential campaign. Mass Communication & Society, 8, 373–385. doi: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0804_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zoch, L. M., & Turk, J. V. (1998). Women making news: Gender as a variable in source selection and use. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 762–775. doi: 10.1177/107769909807500410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Mateos de Cabo
    • 1
  • Ricardo Gimeno
    • 2
  • Miryam Martínez
    • 1
  • Luis López
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Management & Business AdministrationUniversidad CEU San Pablo28003Spain
  2. 2.Research DepartmentBanco de EspañaMadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of ComputingUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations