Theory and past research predict an increase in the sexualization of girls in United States culture. We used content analysis to examine change in the number of sexualizing characteristics (e.g., low cut shirts, high-heeled shoes) and childlike characteristics (e.g., polka-dot print, Mary-Jane style shoes) present in depictions of girls across time in the magazines Seventeen (N = 1649 images from issues in selected issues from 1971 through 2011) and Girls’ Life (N = 763 images from selected issues from 1994 to 2011). One-way ANOVAS revealed increases in the total number of sexualizing characteristics across time in both magazines. In particular, depictions of low-cut tops and tight fitting clothing increased in both magazines. There was also a decrease in the number of childlike characteristics in Girls’ Life across time. Possible reasons for increased sexualization as well as possible consequences are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html.
ASAPS-2012-Stats. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/ASAPS-2012-Stats.pdf.
Aubrey, J. S. (2007). Does television exposure influence college-aged women’s sexual self-concept? Media Psychology, 10, 157–181. doi:10.1080/15213260701375561.
Audit Bureau of Circulations. (2011). Retrieved from http://abcas3.accessabc.com/ecirc/magform.asp.
Bailey, R. (2011). Letting children be children: Report of an independent review of the commercialization and sexualization of childhood. London: Department for Education. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/Bailey%20Review.pdf.
Boyd, H., & Murnen, S. K. (2011, April) How sexy are girls’ dolls? A content analysis of sexualizing characteristics of age 3–11 girls’ dolls. Paper presented at the Ohio Undergraduate Psychology Conference, Kenyon College, Gambier, OH.
Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (Eds.). (2011). Self objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood. (2013, August). Retrieved from http://www.commercialfreechildhood.org/.
Carpenter, L. M. (1998). From girls into women: Scripts for sexuality and romance in Seventeen magazine, 1974–1994. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 158–168. doi:10.1080/00224499809551929.
Collins, R. L. (2011). Content analysis of gender roles in media: Where are we now and where should we go? Sex Roles, 64, 290–298. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9929-5.
Coy, M. (2009). Milkshakes, lady lumps and growing up to want boobies: How the sexualisation of popular culture limits girls’ horizons. Child Abuse Review, 18, 372–383. doi:10.1002/car.1094.
Daniels, E. A., & Wartena, H. (2011). Athlete or sex symbol: What boys think of media representations of female athletes. Sex Roles, 65, 566–579. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9959-7.
Dill, K. E., & Thrill, K. P. (2007). Video game characters and the socialization of gender roles: Young people’s perceptions mirror sexist media depictions. Sex Roles, 57, 851–862. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9278-1.
Dittmar, H., Halliwell, E., & Stirling, E. (2009). Understanding the impact of thin media models on women’s body focused affect: The roles of thin-ideal internalization and weight-related self-discrepancy activation in experimental exposure effects. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 43–72. doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.1.43.
Douglas, S. J. (2010). Enlightened sexism: The seductive message that feminism’s work is done. NY, NY: Times Books.
Downs, E., & Smith, S. L. (2010). Keeping abreast of hypersexuality: A video game character content analysis. Sex Roles, 62, 721–733. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9278-1.
Duke, L. L., & Kreshel, P. J. (1998). Negotiating femininity: Girls in early adolescence read teen magazines. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 22, 48–71. doi:10.1117/0196859998022001005.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.
Garner, A., Sterk, H. M., & Adams, S. (1998). Narrative analysis of sexual etiquette in teenage magazines. Journal of Communication, 48, 59–78. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02770.x.
Girls’ Life. (2012, August). Retrieved from http://www.girlslife.com/page/about.aspx.
Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in ow- and high- status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389–395. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00238.x.
Goodin, S., Van Denburg, A., Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2011). “Putting on” sexiness: A content analysis of the presence of sexualizing characteristics in girls’ clothing. Sex Roles, 65, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9966-8.
Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 460–476. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460.
Graff, K., Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2012). Too sexualized to be taken seriously? Perceptions of a girl in childlike vs. sexualizing clothing. Sex Roles, 11, 764–775. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0145-3.
Greenwood, D. N., & Lippman, J. R. (2010). Gender and media: Content, uses, and impact. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 643–699). New York: Springer.
Guillen, E. O., & Barr, S. I. (1994). Nutrition, dieting, and fitness messages in a magazine for adolescent women, 1970–1990. Journal of Adolescent Health, 15, 464–472. doi:10.1016/1054-139X(94)90493-M.
Gurung, R. A. R., & Chrouser, C. J. (2007). Predicting objectification: Do provocative clothing and observer characteristics matter? Sex Roles, 57, 91–99. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9219-z.
Hatton, E., & Trautner, M. N. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The sexualization of men and women on the cover of rolling stone. Sexuality and Culture, 15, 256–278. doi:10.1007/s12119-011-9093-2.
Hopper, R. (2005). What are teenagers reading? Adolescent fiction reading habits and reading choices. Literacty, 39, 113–120. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9345.2005.00409.x.
Jeffreys, S. (2005). Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West. New York: Routledge.
Kaiser Family Foundation. (2004). Key facts: Tweens, teens, and magazines. Retrieved from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/tweens-teens-andmagazines-fact-sheet.pdf.
Kaiser Family Foundation. (2010). Generation M 2 : Media in the lives of 8-to18-year olds. Retrieved from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf.
Lamb, S., & Brown, L. (2006). Packaging girlhood: Rescuing our daughters from marketers’ schemes. New York: St Martins Griffin.
Larson, R. (1995). Secrets in the bedroom: Adolescents’ private use of media. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 535–550. doi:10.1007/BF01537055.
Levin, D., & Kilbourne, J. (2008). So sexy so soon: The new sexualized childhood and what parents can do to protect their kids. New York: Ballantine Books.
Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2009). Everybody knows that mass media [pick one] are/are not a cause of eating disorders: A critical review of evidence for a causal link between media, negative body image, and disordered eating in females. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 9–42. doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.1.9.
Lindberg, S., Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2007). A measure of objectified body consciousness for preadolescent and adolescent youth. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 65–76. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00263.x.
Luff, G. M., & Gray, J. J. (2009). Complex messages regarding a thin ideal appearing in teenage girls’ magazines from 1956 to 2005. Body Image, 6, 133–136. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.01.004.
Massoni, K. (2007). Bringing up “baby”: The birth and early development of “Seventeen” magazine. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(12-A), 5226. (UMI Number: 3291425).
McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Self- objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.
Merskin, D. (2004). Reviving Lolita? A media literacy examination of sexual portrayals of girls in fashion advertising. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 119–129. doi:10.1177/0002764204267257.
Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.
Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matterson, A. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0022-022.214.171.1240.
Muehlenkamp, J. J., & Saris-Baglama, R. N. (2002). Self-objectification and its psychological outcomes for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 371–379. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00076.
Murnen, S. K., & Seabrook, R. (2012). Feminist perspectives on body image and physical appearance. In T. Cash (Ed.), Encyclopedia of body image and human appearance (Vol. 1, pp. 438–443). San Diego: Academic.
Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2009). Are feminist women protected from body image problems? A meta-analytic review of relevant research. Sex Roles, 60, 186–197. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9523-2.
Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2011). I’d rather be a famous fashion model than a famous scientist: The rewards and costs of internalizing sexualization. In E. Zurbriggen & T. A. Roberts (Eds.), The sexualization of girls and girlhood. New York: Oxford University Press.
Murnen, S. K., Smolak, L., Mills, J. A., & Good, L. (2003). Thin, sexy women and strong, muscular men: Grade-school children’s responses to objectified images of women and men. Sex Roles, 49, 427–437. doi:10.1023/A:1025868320206.
Nowatzki, J., & Morry, M. M. (2009). Women’s intentions regarding, and acceptance of, self-sexualizing behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 95–107. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01477.x.
Paul, P. (2005). Pornified: How pornography is transforming our lives, our relationships, and our families. New York: Times Books.
Peirce, K. (1993). Socialization of teenage girls through teen-magazine fiction: The making of a new woman or an old lady? Sex Roles, 29, 59–68. doi:10.1007/BF00289996.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2009). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit internet material and notions of women as sex objects: Assessing causality and underlying processes. Journal of Communication, 59, 407–433. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01422.x.
Reichert, T., & Carpenter, C. (2004). An update on sex in magazine advertising: 1983 to 2003. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 823–837. doi:10.1177/0887302X08327087.
Seidman, S. A. (1992). An investigation of sex-role stereotyping in music videos. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36, 209–216. doi:10.1080/08838159209364168.
Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 46, 343–349. doi:10.1023/A:1020232714705.
Slater, A., Tiggemann, M., Firth, B., & Hawkins, K. (2012). Reality check: An experimental investigation of the addition of warning labels to fashion magazine images on women’s mood and body dissatisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31, 105–122. doi:10.1521/jscp.2012.31.2.105.
Smolak, L., & Murnen, S. K. (2011). The sexualization of women and girls as key antecedents to self-objectification. In R. Calogero & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), The objectification of women: Innovative directions in research and practice (pp. 53–75). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Stankiewicz, J. M., & Rosselli, F. (2008). Women as sex objects and victims in print advertisements. Sex Roles, 58, 579–589. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9359-1.
Strahan, E. J., Lafrance, A., Wilson, A. E., Ethler, N., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2008). Victoria’s dirty secret: How sociocultural norms influence adolescent girls and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 288–301. doi:10.1177/0146167207310457.
Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00200.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Ward, L. M., & Friedman, K. (2006). Using TV as a guide: Associations between television viewing and adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 133–156. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00125.
Ward, L. M., Hansbrough, E., & Walker, E. (2005). Contributions of music video exposure to black adolescents’ gender and sexual schemas. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20, 143–166. doi:10.1177/0743558404271135.
About this article
Cite this article
Graff, K.A., Murnen, S.K. & Krause, A.K. Low-Cut Shirts and High-Heeled Shoes: Increased Sexualization Across Time in Magazine Depictions of Girls. Sex Roles 69, 571–582 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0321-0
- Sexual objectification
- Girls’ magazines