Sex Roles

, Volume 69, Issue 11–12, pp 571–582 | Cite as

Low-Cut Shirts and High-Heeled Shoes: Increased Sexualization Across Time in Magazine Depictions of Girls

  • Kaitlin A. Graff
  • Sarah K. Murnen
  • Anna K. Krause
Original Article

Abstract

Theory and past research predict an increase in the sexualization of girls in United States culture. We used content analysis to examine change in the number of sexualizing characteristics (e.g., low cut shirts, high-heeled shoes) and childlike characteristics (e.g., polka-dot print, Mary-Jane style shoes) present in depictions of girls across time in the magazines Seventeen (N = 1649 images from issues in selected issues from 1971 through 2011) and Girls’ Life (N = 763 images from selected issues from 1994 to 2011). One-way ANOVAS revealed increases in the total number of sexualizing characteristics across time in both magazines. In particular, depictions of low-cut tops and tight fitting clothing increased in both magazines. There was also a decrease in the number of childlike characteristics in Girls’ Life across time. Possible reasons for increased sexualization as well as possible consequences are discussed.

Keywords Sexual objectification Sexy Girls’ magazines 

References

  1. American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html.Google Scholar
  2. ASAPS-2012-Stats. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/ASAPS-2012-Stats.pdf.
  3. Aubrey, J. S. (2007). Does television exposure influence college-aged women’s sexual self-concept? Media Psychology, 10, 157–181. doi:10.1080/15213260701375561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audit Bureau of Circulations. (2011). Retrieved from http://abcas3.accessabc.com/ecirc/magform.asp.
  5. Bailey, R. (2011). Letting children be children: Report of an independent review of the commercialization and sexualization of childhood. London: Department for Education. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/Bailey%20Review.pdf.Google Scholar
  6. Boyd, H., & Murnen, S. K. (2011, April) How sexy are girls’ dolls? A content analysis of sexualizing characteristics of age 3–11 girls’ dolls. Paper presented at the Ohio Undergraduate Psychology Conference, Kenyon College, Gambier, OH.Google Scholar
  7. Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (Eds.). (2011). Self objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  8. Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood. (2013, August). Retrieved from http://www.commercialfreechildhood.org/.
  9. Carpenter, L. M. (1998). From girls into women: Scripts for sexuality and romance in Seventeen magazine, 1974–1994. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 158–168. doi:10.1080/00224499809551929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins, R. L. (2011). Content analysis of gender roles in media: Where are we now and where should we go? Sex Roles, 64, 290–298. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9929-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coy, M. (2009). Milkshakes, lady lumps and growing up to want boobies: How the sexualisation of popular culture limits girls’ horizons. Child Abuse Review, 18, 372–383. doi:10.1002/car.1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daniels, E. A., & Wartena, H. (2011). Athlete or sex symbol: What boys think of media representations of female athletes. Sex Roles, 65, 566–579. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9959-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dill, K. E., & Thrill, K. P. (2007). Video game characters and the socialization of gender roles: Young people’s perceptions mirror sexist media depictions. Sex Roles, 57, 851–862. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9278-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dittmar, H., Halliwell, E., & Stirling, E. (2009). Understanding the impact of thin media models on women’s body focused affect: The roles of thin-ideal internalization and weight-related self-discrepancy activation in experimental exposure effects. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 43–72. doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.1.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Douglas, S. J. (2010). Enlightened sexism: The seductive message that feminism’s work is done. NY, NY: Times Books.Google Scholar
  16. Downs, E., & Smith, S. L. (2010). Keeping abreast of hypersexuality: A video game character content analysis. Sex Roles, 62, 721–733. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9278-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duke, L. L., & Kreshel, P. J. (1998). Negotiating femininity: Girls in early adolescence read teen magazines. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 22, 48–71. doi:10.1117/0196859998022001005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garner, A., Sterk, H. M., & Adams, S. (1998). Narrative analysis of sexual etiquette in teenage magazines. Journal of Communication, 48, 59–78. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02770.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Girls’ Life. (2012, August). Retrieved from http://www.girlslife.com/page/about.aspx.
  21. Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in ow- and high- status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389–395. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00238.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodin, S., Van Denburg, A., Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2011). “Putting on” sexiness: A content analysis of the presence of sexualizing characteristics in girls’ clothing. Sex Roles, 65, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9966-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 460–476. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graff, K., Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2012). Too sexualized to be taken seriously? Perceptions of a girl in childlike vs. sexualizing clothing. Sex Roles, 11, 764–775. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0145-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenwood, D. N., & Lippman, J. R. (2010). Gender and media: Content, uses, and impact. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 643–699). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guillen, E. O., & Barr, S. I. (1994). Nutrition, dieting, and fitness messages in a magazine for adolescent women, 1970–1990. Journal of Adolescent Health, 15, 464–472. doi:10.1016/1054-139X(94)90493-M.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gurung, R. A. R., & Chrouser, C. J. (2007). Predicting objectification: Do provocative clothing and observer characteristics matter? Sex Roles, 57, 91–99. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9219-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hatton, E., & Trautner, M. N. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The sexualization of men and women on the cover of rolling stone. Sexuality and Culture, 15, 256–278. doi:10.1007/s12119-011-9093-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hopper, R. (2005). What are teenagers reading? Adolescent fiction reading habits and reading choices. Literacty, 39, 113–120. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9345.2005.00409.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jeffreys, S. (2005). Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2004). Key facts: Tweens, teens, and magazines. Retrieved from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/tweens-teens-andmagazines-fact-sheet.pdf.
  32. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2010). Generation M 2 : Media in the lives of 8-to18-year olds. Retrieved from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf.
  33. Lamb, S., & Brown, L. (2006). Packaging girlhood: Rescuing our daughters from marketers’ schemes. New York: St Martins Griffin.Google Scholar
  34. Larson, R. (1995). Secrets in the bedroom: Adolescents’ private use of media. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 535–550. doi:10.1007/BF01537055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levin, D., & Kilbourne, J. (2008). So sexy so soon: The new sexualized childhood and what parents can do to protect their kids. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  36. Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2009). Everybody knows that mass media [pick one] are/are not a cause of eating disorders: A critical review of evidence for a causal link between media, negative body image, and disordered eating in females. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 9–42. doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.1.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lindberg, S., Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2007). A measure of objectified body consciousness for preadolescent and adolescent youth. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 65–76. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00263.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luff, G. M., & Gray, J. J. (2009). Complex messages regarding a thin ideal appearing in teenage girls’ magazines from 1956 to 2005. Body Image, 6, 133–136. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.01.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Massoni, K. (2007). Bringing up “baby”: The birth and early development of “Seventeen” magazine. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(12-A), 5226. (UMI Number: 3291425).Google Scholar
  40. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Self- objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.Google Scholar
  41. Merskin, D. (2004). Reviving Lolita? A media literacy examination of sexual portrayals of girls in fashion advertising. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 119–129. doi:10.1177/0002764204267257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matterson, A. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Muehlenkamp, J. J., & Saris-Baglama, R. N. (2002). Self-objectification and its psychological outcomes for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 371–379. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Murnen, S. K., & Seabrook, R. (2012). Feminist perspectives on body image and physical appearance. In T. Cash (Ed.), Encyclopedia of body image and human appearance (Vol. 1, pp. 438–443). San Diego: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2009). Are feminist women protected from body image problems? A meta-analytic review of relevant research. Sex Roles, 60, 186–197. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9523-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2011). I’d rather be a famous fashion model than a famous scientist: The rewards and costs of internalizing sexualization. In E. Zurbriggen & T. A. Roberts (Eds.), The sexualization of girls and girlhood. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Murnen, S. K., Smolak, L., Mills, J. A., & Good, L. (2003). Thin, sexy women and strong, muscular men: Grade-school children’s responses to objectified images of women and men. Sex Roles, 49, 427–437. doi:10.1023/A:1025868320206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nowatzki, J., & Morry, M. M. (2009). Women’s intentions regarding, and acceptance of, self-sexualizing behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 95–107. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01477.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Paul, P. (2005). Pornified: How pornography is transforming our lives, our relationships, and our families. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  51. Peirce, K. (1993). Socialization of teenage girls through teen-magazine fiction: The making of a new woman or an old lady? Sex Roles, 29, 59–68. doi:10.1007/BF00289996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2009). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit internet material and notions of women as sex objects: Assessing causality and underlying processes. Journal of Communication, 59, 407–433. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01422.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reichert, T., & Carpenter, C. (2004). An update on sex in magazine advertising: 1983 to 2003. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 823–837. doi:10.1177/0887302X08327087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seidman, S. A. (1992). An investigation of sex-role stereotyping in music videos. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36, 209–216. doi:10.1080/08838159209364168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 46, 343–349. doi:10.1023/A:1020232714705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Slater, A., Tiggemann, M., Firth, B., & Hawkins, K. (2012). Reality check: An experimental investigation of the addition of warning labels to fashion magazine images on women’s mood and body dissatisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31, 105–122. doi:10.1521/jscp.2012.31.2.105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smolak, L., & Murnen, S. K. (2011). The sexualization of women and girls as key antecedents to self-objectification. In R. Calogero & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), The objectification of women: Innovative directions in research and practice (pp. 53–75). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  58. Stankiewicz, J. M., & Rosselli, F. (2008). Women as sex objects and victims in print advertisements. Sex Roles, 58, 579–589. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9359-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Strahan, E. J., Lafrance, A., Wilson, A. E., Ethler, N., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2008). Victoria’s dirty secret: How sociocultural norms influence adolescent girls and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 288–301. doi:10.1177/0146167207310457.Google Scholar
  60. Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  62. Ward, L. M., & Friedman, K. (2006). Using TV as a guide: Associations between television viewing and adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 133–156. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ward, L. M., Hansbrough, E., & Walker, E. (2005). Contributions of music video exposure to black adolescents’ gender and sexual schemas. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20, 143–166. doi:10.1177/0743558404271135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaitlin A. Graff
    • 1
  • Sarah K. Murnen
    • 1
  • Anna K. Krause
    • 1
  1. 1.Kenyon CollegeGambierUSA

Personalised recommendations