Sex Roles

, Volume 69, Issue 11–12, pp 594–604 | Cite as

Sexting, Catcalls, and Butt Slaps: How Gender Stereotypes and Perceived Group Norms Predict Sexualized Behavior

Original Article

Abstract

The current study examined the role of endorsed stereotypes about men and women and perceived peer norms in predicting three distinct types of stereotypical sexualized behaviors (verbal, physical, and indirect) among late adolescents. Two hundred and fifty U.S. college students from the mid-South (178 females, 72 males) between the ages of 17 and 19 completed a number of surveys regarding sexual gender stereotypes (e.g., men are sex-focused and women are sexual objects), perceived peer norms about the acceptability of stereotypical sexualized behaviors (SSB), and their own SSBs. Results revealed that most college students have perpetrated these SSBs at least once, and that the most common form of sexualized behavior was verbal SSB, such as rating someone’s body. Results also showed that, although the young men and women did not differ in their perpetration of indirect SSBs (e.g., sending pictures via text), young men perpetrated more verbal and physical SSB than women. For young women, endorsing the idea that men are sex-focused predicted all three types of SSB. For young men, endorsing the stereotype that men are sex-focused predicted verbal and physical SSB, and endorsing the stereotype that women are sex objects predicted physical SSB. Importantly, perceived peer group norms were a significant predictor of all three types of SSB for both women and men. Thus, the current study suggests that distinct types of stereotypical sexualized behaviors are common among college students, and are predicted by an individual’s stereotypes about men and women and perceived peer norms.

Keywords

Sexual behavior Peer norms Gender stereotypes 

References

  1. American Association of University Women. (2001). Hostile hallways: Bullying, teasing, and sexual harassment in school. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Basow, S. A., & Minieri, A. (2011). “You owe me”: Effects of date cost, who pays, participant gender, and rape myth beliefs on perceptions of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 479–497. doi:10.1177/0886260510363421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belknap, J., & Melton, H. (2005). Are heterosexual men also victims of intimate partner abuse. Harrisburg, PA: VAWnet. a project of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence/Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence.Google Scholar
  4. Berkowitz, A. (2003). Applications of social norms theory to other health and social justice issues. In H. Perkins (Ed.), The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians (pp. 259–279). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2001). Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 391–424. doi:10.1016/S0899-3289(01)00098-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2003). Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 331–341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiodo, D., Wolfe, D. A., Crooks, C., Hughes, R., & Jaffe, P. (2009). Impact of sexual harassment victimization by peers on subsequent adolescent victimization and adjustment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 246–252. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.01.006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cope-Farrar, K. M., & Kunkel, D. (2002). Sexual messages in teens’ favorite primetime television programs. In J. D. Brown, J. R. Steele, & K. Walsh-Childers (Eds.), Sexual teens, sexual media: Investigating media’s influence on adolescent sexuality (pp. 59–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Dake, J. A., Price, J. H., Maziarz, L., & Ward, B. (2012). Prevalence and correlates of sexting behavior in adolescents. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 7, 1–15. doi:10.1080/15546128.2012.650959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferris, A. L., Smith, S. W., Greenberg, B. S., & Smith, S. L. (2007). The content of reality dating shows and viewer perceptions of dating. Journal of Communication, 57, 490–510. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00354.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fishbein, M., & Middlestadt, S. E. (1989). Using the theory of reasoned action as a framework for understanding and changing AIDS-related behaviors. In V. M. Mays, G. W. Albee, & S. F. Schneider (Eds.), Primary prevention of AIDS: Psychological approaches (pp. 93–110). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Galambos, N. L., Petersen, A. C., Richards, M., & Gitelson, I. B. (1985). The Attitudes toward Women Scale for Adolescents (AWSA): A study of reliability and validity. Sex Roles, 13, 343–356. doi:10.1007/BF00288090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia, J. R., & Reiber, C. (2008). Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2, 192–208.Google Scholar
  14. Goldstein, S. E., Malanchuk, O., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). Risk factors of sexual harassment by peers: A longitudinal investigation of African American and European American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 285–300. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00523.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenberg, B. S., Linsangan, R., & Soderman, A. (1993). Adolescents’ reactions to television sex. In B. S. Greenberg, J. D. Brown, & N. L. Buerkel-Rothfuss (Eds.), Media, sex, and the adolescent (pp. 177–224). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hand, J. Z., & Sanchez, L. (2000). Badgering or bantering? Gender differences in experience of, and reactions to, sexual harassment among U. S. high school students. Gender & Society, 14, 718–746. doi:10.1177/089124300014006002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kapadia, F., Frye, V., Bonner, S., Emmanuel, P. J., Samples, C. L., & Latka, M. H. (2012). Perceived peer safer sex norms and sexual risk behaviors among substance-using Latino adolescents. AIDS Education and Prevention, 24, 27–40. doi:10.1521/aeap.2012.24.1.27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K., Zybergold, B. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the Heterosexual Script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 145–157. doi:10.1080/00224490701263660.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kincaid, D. L. (2004). From innovation to social norm: Bounded normative influence. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 37–57. doi:10.1080/10810730490271511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krassas, N. R., Blauwkamp, J. M., & Wesselink, P. (2003). ‘Master your Johnson’: Sexual rhetoric in Maxim and Stuff magazines. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 7, 98–119. doi:10.1007/s12119-003-1005-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larkin, J., & Popaleni, K. (1994). Heterosexual courtship violence and sexual harassment: The private and public control of young women. Feminism & Psychology, 4, 213–227. doi:10.1177/0959353594042002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leaper, C., & Brown, C. (2008). Perceived experiences with sexism among adolescent girls. Child Development, 79, 685–704. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01151.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and sexting: How and why minor teens are sending sexually suggestive nude or nearly nude images via text messaging. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Teens-and-Sexting.aspx.
  24. Maxwell, K. A. (2002). Friends: The role of peer influence across adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 267–277. doi:10.1023/A:1015493316865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McMaster, L. E., Connolly, J., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. M. (2002). Peer to peer sexual harassment in early adolescence: A developmental perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 91–105. doi:10.1017/S0954579402001050.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ménard, K. S., Hall, G. C. N., Phung, A. H., Ghebrial, M. F. E., & Martin, L. (2003). Gender differences in sexual harassment and coercion in college students: Developmental, individual, and situational determinants. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 1222–1239. doi:10.1177/0886260503256654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morrison, T. G., McLeod, L. D., Morrison, M. A., Anderson, D., & O’Connor, W. E. (1997). Gender stereotyping, homonegativity, and misconceptions about sexually coercive behavior among adolescents. Youth and Society, 28, 351–382. doi:10.1177/0044118X97028003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186–196. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.2.186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neighbors, C., Dillard, A. J., Lewis, M. A., Bergstrom, R. L., & Neil, T. A. (2006). Normative misperceptions and temporal precedence of perceived norms and drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 290–299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). ‘Hookups’: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rimal, R. (2008). Modeling the relationship between descriptive norms and behaviors: A test and extension of the theory of normative social behavior (TNSB). Health Communication, 23, 103–116. doi:10.1080/10410230801967791.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodkin, P. C., & Fischer, K. (2003). Sexual harassment and the cultures of childhood: Developmental, domestic violence, and legal perspectives. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Signorella, M. L., Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (1993). Developmental differences in children’s gender schemata about others: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 13, 147–183. doi:10.1006/drev.1993.1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Terrance, C., Logan, A., & Peters, D. (2004). Perceptions of peer sexual harassment among high school students. Sex Roles, 51, 479–490. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000049236.68806.59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Timmerman, G. (2003). Sexual harassment of adolescents perpetrated by teachers and by peers: An exploration of the dynamics of power, culture, and gender in secondary schools. Sex Roles, 48, 231–244. doi:10.1023/A:1022821320739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Timmerman, G. (2005). A comparison between girls’ and boys’ experiences of unwanted sexual behaviour in secondary schools. Educational Research, 47, 291–306. doi:10.1080/00131880500287641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tolman, D. L., Kim, J. L., Schooler, D. S., & Sorsoli, C. L. (2007). Rethinking the associations between television viewing and adolescent sexuality development: Bringing gender into focus. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 84.e9–84.e16. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tyler, C. P., Warner, L., Kraft, J. M., Spitz, A., Gavin, L., Grigorescu, V., et al. (2012, May 4). Sexual experience and contraceptive use among female teens—United States 1995, 2002, and 2006–2010. U.S. Center for Disease Control. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6117a1.htm.
  40. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). State & county Quickfacts: Fayette County, KY. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov.
  41. Ward, L. M. (1995). Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 595–615. doi:10.1007/BF01537058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ward, L. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 1–15. doi:10.1023/A:1014068031532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ward, L. M., & Rivadeneyra, R. (1999). Contributions of entertainment television to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and expectations: The role of viewing amount versus viewer involvement. The Journal of Sex Research, 36, 237–249. doi:10.1080/00224499909551994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., & Caruthers, A. (2006). Breasts are for men: Media, masculinity ideologies, and men’s beliefs about women’s bodies. Sex Roles, 55, 703–714. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9125-9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations