Sex Roles

, Volume 69, Issue 1–2, pp 89–106 | Cite as

Parental Role Portrayals in Twentieth Century Children’s Picture Books: More Egalitarian or Ongoing Stereotyping?

  • Amy L. DeWitt
  • Cynthia M. Cready
  • Rudy Ray Seward
Original Article

Abstract

Gender role stereotyping continues to dominate within many media forms. This research examined the portrayals of mothers and fathers as companions, disciplinarians, caregivers, nurturers, and providers in 300 twentieth century children’s picture books randomly selected from the Children’s Catalog (H.W. Wilson Company, 2001). The books were published in the United States between the years of 1902 and 2000. The list of texts was stratified by time periods before sampling. The impact of time of publication upon each of the five parental role constructs was assessed using cross-tabulations. Previous analyses suggest traditional parental role portrayals are commonplace, but by employing time of publication as an independent variable, the researchers questioned whether an evolvement of roles would be noted. By examining the father and mother role performances independently over time it was expected that some progression toward egalitarianism would be noted. Overall, mothers did outperform fathers in nurturing and caregiving, and fathers outperformed mothers in companion and providing behaviors. However, when these behaviors were cross-tabulated with time of publication, no significant role evolvement was found. For example, while not statistically significant, father characters were most likely to nurture, provide care, and act as a child’s companion in books published in the 1970s, but these behaviors declined in subsequent time periods. The role evolvement of mother characters also lacked statistical significance, suggesting that the traditional male breadwinner-female homemaker model has been consistently portrayed in children’s picture books.

Keywords

Parents Children’s literature Father Mother Disciplinarian Caregiver Nurturer Provider 

References

  1. Adams, M., Walker, C., & O’Connell, P. (2011). Invisible or involved fathers? A content analysis of representation of parenting in young children’s picturebooks in the UK. Sex Roles, 65, 259–270. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0011-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldous, J. (1969). Occupational characteristics and males: Role Performance in the family. Journal of Marriage and Family, 31, 707–713. doi:10.2307/349312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, K. J., Miller, P. J., & Hengst, J. A. (2001). Young children’s emotional attachments to stories. Social Development, 10, 374–398. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, A. M., Allen, D. N., & Sigler, G. (1993). Changes in sex-role stereotyping in Caldecott Medal Award Picture Books 1938–1988. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 7, 67–73. doi:10.1080/02568549309594842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, D. A., & Hamilton, M. (2005). Gender role stereotyping of parents in children’s picture books: The invisible father. Sex Roles, 52, 145–151. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1290-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashton, E. (1983). Measures of play behavior: The influence of sex-role stereotyped children’s books. Sex Roles, 9, 43–47. doi:10.1007/BF00303108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barclay, L. K. (1974). The emergence of vocational expectations in preschool children. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 4, 1–14. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(74)90086-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernard, J. (1981). The good provider role: Its rise and fall. American Psychologist, 36, 1–12. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.36.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bose, C. E. (1987). Dual spheres. In B. B. Hess & M. M. Ferree (Eds.), Analyzing gender: A handbook of social science research (pp. 267–285). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Children’s Catalog (2001). New York: H.W. Wilson.Google Scholar
  11. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, R., Lennon, R., & Morris, L. (1993). Of Caldecotts and Kings: Gendered images in recent American children’s books by black and non-black illustrators. Gender and Society, 7, 227–245. doi:10.1177/089124393007002005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coltrane, S., & Allan, K. (1994). “New” fathers and old stereotypes: Representations of masculinity in 1980s television advertising. Masculinities, 2, 43–66.Google Scholar
  14. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and social order. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
  15. Crabb, P. B., & Bielawski, D. (1994). The social representation of material culture and gender in children’s books. Sex Roles, 30, 69–79. doi:10.1007/BF01420740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crabb, P. B., & Marciano, D. L. (2011). Representations of material culture and gender in award-winning children’s books: A 20-year follow-up. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25, 390–398. doi:10.1080/02568543.2011.605209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doherty, W. J., Kouneski, E. F., & Erikson, M. F. (1998). Responsible fathering: An overview and conceptual framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 277–292. doi:10.2307/353848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gooden, A. M., & Gooden, M. A. (2001). Gender representation in notable children’s picture books: 1995–1999. Sex Roles, 45, 89–101. doi:10.1023/A:1013064418674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamilton, M. C., Anderson, D., Broaddus, M., & Young, K. (2006). Gender stereotyping and under-representation of female characters in 200 popular children’s picture books: A twenty-first century update. Sex Roles, 55, 757–765. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9128-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hartley, R. E. (1969). Some implications of current changes in sex-role patterns. In J. N. Edwards (Ed.), The family and change (pp. 212–225). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  21. Hillman, J. S. (1974). An analysis of male and female roles in two periods of children’s literature. The Journal of Educational Research, 68, 84–88.Google Scholar
  22. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  23. Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 255–269. doi:10.2307/2787127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ihinger-Tallman, M., Pasley, K., & Buehler, C. (1995). Developing a middle-range theory of father involvement post divorce. In W. Marsiglio (Ed.), Fatherhood: Contemporary theory, research, and social policy (pp. 57–77). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Jackson, S., & Gee, S. (2005). ‘Look Janet’, ‘No you look John’: constructions of gender in early school reader illustrations across 50 years. Gender and Education, 17, 115–128. doi:10.1080/0954025042000301410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jennings, S. A. (1975). Effects of sex typing in children’s stories on preference and recall. Child Development, 46, 220–223. doi:10.2307/1128852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joels, R. W. (1999). Weaving world understanding: The importance of translations in international children’s literature. Children’s Literature in Education, 30, 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kolbe, R., & LaVoie, J. C. (1981). Sex-role stereotyping in preschool children’s picture books. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 369–374. doi:10.2307/3033906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kotelchuck, M. (1976). The infant’s relationship to the father: Experimental evidence. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 329–344). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Lamb, M. E. (1977). Father-infant and mother-infant interaction in the first year of life. Child Development, 48, 167–181. doi:10.2307/1128896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lamb, M. E. (1987). The emergent American father. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The father’s role: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  33. Lamb, M. E. (1997). The development of father-infant relationships. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 104–120). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  34. LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135–163). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. LaRossa, R., Jaret, C., Gadgil, M., & Wynn, G. R. (2000). The changing culture of fatherhood in comic-strip families: A six-decade analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 375–387. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00375.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marsiglio, W. (1991). Paternal engagement activities with minor children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 973–986. doi:10.2307/353001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marsiglio, W., Day, R. D., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Exploring fatherhood diversity: Implications for conceptualizing father involvement. Marriage and Family Review, 29, 269–293. doi:10.1300/J002v29n04_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions: An examination of human associations in everyday life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Minton, C., & Palsey, K. (1996). Fathers’ parenting role identity and father involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 26–45. doi:10.1177/019251396017001003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parke, R. D., & O’Leary, S. E. (1976). Father-mother-infant interaction in newborn period: Some findings, some observations and some unresolved issues. In K. Riegel & J. Meacham (Eds.), The developing individual in a changing world (Vol. 2, pp. 653–663). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  42. Parsons, T. (1943). The kinship system of the contemporary United States. American Anthropologist, 45, 22–38. doi:10.1525/aa.1943.45.1.02a00030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family socialization and interaction process. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pleck, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1997). Fatherhood ideals in the United States: Historical dimensions. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 33–48). New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  45. Potter, B. (1902). The tale of Peter Rabbit. London: Frederick Warne.Google Scholar
  46. Rao, J. N. K., & Scott, A. J. (1984). On chi-squared tests for multi-way tables with cell proportions estimated from survey data. The Annals of Statistics, 12, 46–60. doi:10.1214/aos/1176346391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sendak, M. (1963). Where the wild things are. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  48. Simon, R. W. (1995). Gender, multiple roles, role meaning, and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 182–194. doi:10.2307/2137224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 224–237. doi:10.2307/2695870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 30, 558–564. doi:10.2307/349494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar
  52. Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present and future of identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284–297. doi:10.2307/2695840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thurer, S. L. (1994). The Myths of Motherhood. Sydney: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  54. Turner-Bowker, D. M. (1996). Gender stereotyped descriptors in children’s picture books. Does “curious Jane” exist in the literature? Sex Roles, 35, 461–488. doi:10.1007/BF01544132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weitzman, L. J., Eifler, D., Hokada, E., & Ross, C. (1972). Sex-role socialization in picture books for preschool children. The American Journal of Sociology, 77, 1125–1150. doi:10.1086/225261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy L. DeWitt
    • 1
  • Cynthia M. Cready
    • 2
  • Rudy Ray Seward
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyShepherdstownUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations