Shifts in Women’s Mate Preferences Across the Ovulatory Cycle: A Critique of Harris (2011) and Harris (2012)
- 1.1k Downloads
Many studies have documented systematic shifts in women’s mate preferences and sexual motivations across the ovulatory cycle. Harris (2012) presents a nonreplication of one particular finding in this literature—namely, that women’s preference for masculinity in men’s faces shifts across the cycle. Harris critiques the empirical and theoretical literature on cycle shifts and concludes that the cycle shift hypothesis should be abandoned. Here, we situate Harris’s findings within the broader empirical literature and respond to several of the points in her critique. We conclude that the evidence for cycle shifts in women‘s mate preferences and sexual motivations is much stronger than Harris portrays and that she mischaracterizes the theoretical basis of this work.
KeywordsMenstrual cycle Ovulatory cycle Ovulation Facial masculinity Mate preferences Sexual motivations
- Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Law Smith, M. J., Moore, F. R., DeBruine, L. M., Cornwell, R. E., . . . Perrett, D. I. (2006). Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.004
- Furuichi, T., & Hashimoto, C. (2002). Why female bonobos have a lower copulation rate during estrus than chimpanzees. In C. Boesch, G. Hohmann, & L. Marchant (Eds.), Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos (pp. 156–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511606397.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver, C. E. (2002). Changes in women’s sexual interests and their partners’ mate-retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: Evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 975–982. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2010b). Men’s facial masculinity predicts changes in their female partners’ sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle, whereas men’s intelligence does not. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 412–424. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. (2012). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Paper presented at the conference of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
- Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. (2013). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Poster presented at the conference of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- Hale, G. E., Zhao, X., Hughes, C. L., Burger, H. G., Robertson, D. M., & Fraser, I. S. (2007). Endocrine features of menstrual cycles in middle and late reproductive age and the menopausal transition classified according to the staging of reproductive aging (STRAW) staging system. The Journal of Clinical Endocriniology & Metabolism, 92, 3060–3067. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harris, C. R. (2012). Shifts in masculinity preferences across the menstrual cycle: Still not there. Sex Roles. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0229-0.
- Haselton, M. G. (2012). Fertile minds: Changes in human social behavior across the ovulatory cycle. Paper presented at the conference of the Association for Psychological Science, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Haselton, M. G., & Gangestad, S. W. (2012). Human estrus and pair-bonding. Talk presented at the Human Behavior and Evolution Society Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
- Jones, B.C., Perrett, D.I., Little, A.C., Boothroyd, L.G., Cornwell, R.E., Feinberg, D.R., . . . Moore, F.R. (2005). Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 347-354. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2962
- Mikolajczyk, R. T., & Stanford, J. B. (2005). A new method for estimating the effectiveness of emergency contraception that accounts for variation in timing of ovulation and previous cycle length. Fertility and Sterility, 83, 1764–1770. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.097.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rantala, M. J., Coetzee, V., Moore, F. R., Skrinda, I., Kecko, S., Krama, T., . . . Krams, I. (2013). Adiposity, compared with masculinity, serves as a more valid cue to immunocompetence in human mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280(1751). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2495
- Rhodes, G., Morley, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2013). Women can judge sexual unfaithfulness from unfamiliar men’s faces. Biology Letters, 9(1). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0908.
- Scott, I. M. L., Clark, A. P., Boothroyd, L. G. & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2012). Do men’s faces really signal heritable immunocompetence? Behavioral Ecology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ars092
- Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wood, W., Kressel, L., Joshi, P., & Louie, B. (2012). Women’s mate preferences: A meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects. Manuscript Submitted for Publication.Google Scholar