Sex Roles

, Volume 68, Issue 7–8, pp 484–495 | Cite as

Being a Body: Women’s Appearance Related Self-Views and their Dehumanization of Sexually Objectified Female Targets

Original Article

Abstract

When sexually objectified, women are reduced to their bodies or sexual body parts and become likely targets of dehumanization. Not only men, but also women engage in this process. In the present research, we tested the link between women’s appearance related self-views and their tendency to dehumanize sexually objectified female targets. Specifically, we test two mediational models and predict that (1) women’s motivation to look attractive to men and (2) their tendency to internalize the sociocultural beauty standards are linked with the dehumanization of sexually objectified female targets, and their level of self-objectification mediates both relations. To test these hypotheses, a sample of 55 heterosexual undergraduate female students from Northern Italy volunteered. Participants’ motivation to look attractive to men, their level of internalization of the sociocultural beauty standards, and their tendency to self-objectify was measured. Results confirmed that only sexually objectified female targets were significantly dehumanized, while their non-objectified counterparts were not. Moreover, both participants’ motivation to look attractive to men and their tendency to internalize the sociocultural beauty standards were positively linked with the dehumanization of sexually objectified female targets. As expected, these relations were mediated by participants’ level of self-objectification. These results show that higher levels of self-objectification among those women who are motivated either to look attractive to men or to internalize the sociocultural beauty standards are linked with their tendency to dehumanize sexually objectified female targets.

Keywords

Self-objectification Internalization of sociocultural beauty standards Motivation to look attractive to men Dehumanization Romantic relationship 

References

  1. Bagnara, S., Huon, G., & Donazzolo, S. (2004). Factorial structure of the sociocultural attitudes towards appearance questionnaire among Italian and Australian girls. European Eating Disorders Review, 12, 321–326. doi:10.1002/erv.584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cashdan, E. (1998). Are men more competitive than women? British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 213–229. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01166.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Centro Studi Investimenti Sociali [CENSIS], (2006). Women and media in Europe. Retrieved from http://www-b.unipg.it/dut/download/files/Sintesi_Donne_Media.pdf
  5. Cowan, G., Neighbors, C., DeLaMoreaux, J., & Behnke, C. (1998). Women’s hostility toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 267–284. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dakanalis, A., Di Mattei, V. E., Prunas, A., Riva, G., Sarno, L., Volpato, C., & Zanetti, M. A. (2012). Il corpo oggettivato: media, benessere psicofisico e differenze di genere [The objectified body: Media, wellbeing, and gender differences]. Psicologia Sociale, 2, 261–284.Google Scholar
  7. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T. A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. N., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., & Zahidi, S. (2012). The Global Gender Gap Report 2011. Retrieved from the World Economic Forum website: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GenderGap_Report_2012.pdf
  12. Heflick, N. A., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2009). Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 598–601. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heflick, N. A., Goldenberg, J. L., Cooper, D. P., & Puvia, E. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 572–581. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heinberg, L. J., Thompson, J. K., & Stormer, S. (1995). Development and validation of the sociocultural attitudes towards appearance questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 81–89. doi:10.1002/1098-108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hill, M. S., & Fischer, A. R. (2008). Examining objectification theory: lesbian and heterosexual women’s experiences with sexual-and self-objectification. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 745–776. doi:10.1177/0011000007301669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16–32. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lavine, H., Sweeny, D., & Wagner, S. H. (1999). Depicting women as sex objects in television advertising: Effects on body dissatisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1049–1058. doi:10.1177/01461672992511012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., & Ramsey, L. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the enjoyment of sexualization scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 55–68. doi:10.1177/0146167210386119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loya, B. N., Cowan, G., & Walters, C. (2006). The role of social comparison and body consciousness in women’s hostility toward women. Sex Roles, 54, 575–583. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9024-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Malkin, A. R., Wornian, K., & Chrisler, J. C. (1999). Women and weight: Gendered messages on megazines covers. Sex Roles, 40, 647–655. doi:10.1023/A:1018848332464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y.-P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: a decade of advance and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pacilli, M. G., & Mucchi-Faina, A. (2010). Come mi vorrei: interiorizzazione di modelli mediatici e imagine di sé [How I would like myself: Internalization of media models and self-image]. In E. Camussi & N. Monacelli (Eds.), Giornate di Studio su “Questioni sul corpo in psicologia sociale” (pp. 32–38). Parma: Casa editrice universitaria Uninova.Google Scholar
  23. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavioral Research Method, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sanchez, D. T., & Broccoli, T. L. (2008). The Romance of self-objectification: Does priming romantic relationships induce states of self-objectification among women? Sex Roles, 59, 545–554. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9451-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanchez, D. T., & Kwang, T. (2007). When the relationship becomes her: Revisiting women’s body concerns from a relationship contingency perspective. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 401–414. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sengupta, J., & Dahl, D. W. (2008). Gender-related reactions to gratuitous sex appeals in advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 62–78. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2007.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, R. H. (2000). Assimilative and Contrastive Emotional Reactions to Upward and Downward Social Comparison. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research (pp. 173–200). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification? Sex Roles, 52, 707–712. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tiggemann, M., Verri, A., & Scaravaggi, S. (2005). Body dissatisfaction, disordered eating, fashion magazines, and clothes: A cross-cultural comparison between Australian and Italian young women. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 293–302. doi:10.1080/00207590444000311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tylka, T. L., & Calogero, R. (2011). Fiction, fashion, and function finale: An introduction and conclusion to the special issue on gendered body image, part III. Sex Roles, 65, 447–460. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0042-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vaes, J., Paladino, P., & Puvia, E. (2011). Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 774–785. doi:10.1002/ejsp.824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zanardo, L., Chindemi, M. M., & Cantù, C. (2009). Il corpo delle donne [Womens body]. Retrieved from: http://www.ilcorpodelledonne.net/?page_id=91

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization (DPSS)University of PadovaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations