Skip to main content

The Gendered Nature of Discriminatory Experiences by Race, Class, and Sexuality: A Comparison of Intersectionality Theory and the Subordinate Male Target Hypothesis

Sex Roles volume 68, pages 646–659 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Three competing theoretical approaches to social inequalities by gender, race, class, and sexuality are examined. The additive approach assumes that people possessing multiple subordinate-group identities experience the oppressions associated with them as distinct phenomena. The intersectionality-inspired approach suggests that subordinate-group identities such as non-White, lower class, and non-heterosexual interact with gender in a synergistic way, occasioning inordinately pernicious experiences of discrimination for women possessing one or more additional subordinate-group identities. The subordinate male target hypothesis (SMTH) claims that the discrimination experienced by the men of subordinate groups—primarily at the hands of men of dominant groups—is greater than that experienced by the women of the same subordinate groups. In 2009, telephone survey data was collected from 414 women and 208 men in Toronto, Canada and 521 women and 245 men in Vancouver, Canada. Negative binomial regression techniques are applied to these data to determine whether and how gender (male or female), race (White or non-White), educational attainment, household income, and sexual orientation (heterosexual or non-heterosexual), as well as two-way interactions between gender and the other variables, predict scale measures of self-reported major experiences of discrimination and self-reported chronic, routine discriminatory experiences. High levels of both kinds of discrimination reported by men in general are at odds with the additive and intersectionality-inspired perspectives which accord women the gender identity most vulnerable to discrimination. Inordinately high levels of routine discrimination reported by men with a high school diploma or less are consistent with the SMTH-inspired perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Andersen, M. (2008). Thinking about women some more: A new century’s view. Gender and Society, 22, 120–125. doi:10.1177/0891243207309908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, I., & Siegelman, P. (1995). Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. American Economic Review, 85, 304–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baca Zinn, M. B., & Dill, B. T. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22, 321–331. doi:10.2307/3178416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, F. M. (2008). Double jeopardy: To be black and female. Meridians: feminism, race, transnationalism, 8, 166–176. doi:10.2979/MER.2008.8.2.166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J., & Veenstra, G. (2011). A cross-cultural quantitative approach to intersectionality and health: Using intersections between gender, race, class and neighbourhood to predict self-rated health in Toronto and New York City. In O. Hankivsky (Ed.), Health inequities in Canada: Intersectional frameworks and practices (pp. 71–91). Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohmer, P. (2005). Marxist theory of racism and racial inequality. In C. Conrad, J. Whitehead, P. Mason, & J. Stewart (Eds.), African Americans in the U.S. Economy (pp. 94–100). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, R. M. (1993). Theorizing race, class and gender: The new scholarship of black feminist intellectuals and black women’s labor. In S. M. James & A. P. A. Busia (Eds.), Theorizing black feminisms: The visionary pragmatism of black women (pp. 13–30). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1993). Toward a new vision: Race, class, and gender as categories of analysis and connection. Race, Sex and Class, 1, 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, F. R. (2005). Against bipolar black masculinity: Intersectionality, assimilation, identity performance, and hierarchy. UC Davis Law Review, 39, 853–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espiritu, Y. L. (2000). Asian American women and men. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, G. C., Spencer, M. S., Chen, J., & Takeuchi, D. (2007). A nationwide study of discrimination and chronic health conditions among Asian Americans. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 1275–1282. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.091827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghumman, S., & Jackson, L. (2008). Between a cross and a hard place: Religious identifiers and employability. Journal of Workplace Rights, 13, 259–279. doi:10.2190/WR.13.3.d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E. N. (2002). Unequal freedom: How race and gender shaped American citizenship and labor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, O. (Ed.). (2011). Health inequities in Canada: Intersectional frameworks and practices. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2009). Disadvantaged through discrimination? The role of employers in social stratification. The British Journal of Sociology, 60, 669–692. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01270.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. B., & Williams, D. R. (2006). The intersection of race, gender, and SES: Health paradoxes. In A. J. Schulz & L. Mullings (Eds.), Gender, race, class, and health: Intersectional approaches (pp. 131–162). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. M., & Rothenberg, P. S. (1993). Feminist frameworks: Alternative theoretical accounts of the relations between women and men. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness. Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 14, 42–72. doi:10.1086/494491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, N. (1999). Embodying inequality: A review of concepts, measures, and methods for studying health consequences of discrimination. International Journal of Health Services, 29(2), 295–352. doi:10.2190/M11W-VWXE-KQM9-G97Q.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, N., Williams, D. R., & Moss, N. E. (1997). Measuring social class in US public health research: Concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annual Review of Public Health, 18, 341–378. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, B. (Ed.). (2007). Race, gender and class: Theory and methods of analysis. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, N. (1994). Makes me wanna holler: A young black man in America. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B., Mohr, J. J., Worthington, R. L., & Fassinger, R. E. (2009). Counseling psychology research on sexual (orientation) minority issues: Conceptual and methodological challenges and opportunities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 5–22. doi:10.1037/a0014572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete, C. D., McDonald, M. M., Molina, L. E., & Sidanius, J. (2010). Prejudice at the nexus of race and gender: An outgroup male target hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 933–945. doi:10.1037/a0017931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polite, V., & Davis, J. (Eds.). (1999). African American males in school and society: Practices and policies for effective education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poussaint, A. (1987). Black men must organize. Black Scholar, 18(3), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320. doi:10.1080/10463280601055772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puhl, R. M., Andreyeva, T., & Brownell, K. D. (2008). Perceptions of weight discrimination: Prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. International Journal of Obesity, 32, 992–1000. doi:10.1038/ijo.2008.22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purdie-Vaughn, V., & Eibach, R. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, S. C. (1993). AIDS and the African American woman: The triple burden of race, class, and gender. Health Education & Behavior, 20, 305–320. doi:10.1177/109019819302000303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. B., Vines, A. I., Kaufman, J. S., & James, S. A. (2008). Cross-sectional association between perceived discrimination and hypertension in African-American men and women: The Pitt County study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167, 624–632. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, A. J., & Mullings, L. (Eds.). (2006). Gender, race, class, and health: Intersectional approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp. (2009). Stata: Release 11. College Station: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., & Porter, L. E. (1994). Dimensions of perceived discrimination: The personal/group discrimination discrepancy. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice (pp. 233–256). Hillside: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, G. (2009). Racialized identity and health in Canada: Results from a nationally representative survey. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 538–542. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, G. (2011). Race, gender, class, and sexual orientation: Intersecting axes of inequality and self-rated health in Canada. International Journal for Equity in Health, 10, 3. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-10-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, G. (2012). Expressed racial identity and hypertension in a telephone survey sample from Toronto and Vancouver, Canada: Do socioeconomic status, perceived discrimination and psychosocial stress explain the relatively high risk of hypertension for Black Canadians? International Journal for Equity in Health, 11, 58. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, L. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59, 454–463. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L. (2007). Forward. In B. Landry (Ed.), Race, gender and class: Theory and methods of analysis (pp. xi–xiv). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, S. L. (2006). The structure of intersectionality: A comparative politics of gender. Politics & Gender, 2, 235–248. doi:10.1017/S1743923X06231040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R. (1999). Race, socioeconomic status, and health: The added effects of racism of discrimination. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896, 173–188. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08114.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. (2008). Intersectionality analysis in the sentencing of Aboriginal women in Canada: What difference does it make? In D. Cooper, E. Grabham, D. Herman, & J. Krishnadas (Eds.), Intersectionality and beyond: Law, power and the politics of location (pp. 79–104). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., Yu, Y., Jackson, J. S., & Anderson, N. B. (1997). Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socio-economic status, stress and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 335–351. doi:10.1177/135910539700200305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

At the time of this research, Gerry Veenstra was supported by a Senior Scholar career award (2007–2011) from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. The research was funded by a Standard Research Grant awarded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (2006–2011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, 6303 N.W. Marine Drive, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada

    Gerry Veenstra

Authors
  1. Gerry Veenstra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerry Veenstra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veenstra, G. The Gendered Nature of Discriminatory Experiences by Race, Class, and Sexuality: A Comparison of Intersectionality Theory and the Subordinate Male Target Hypothesis. Sex Roles 68, 646–659 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0243-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0243-2

Keywords

  • Self-reported discrimination
  • Additivity
  • Multiplicativity
  • Intersectionality
  • Subordinate male target hypothesis
  • Canada