Sex Roles

, Volume 68, Issue 5–6, pp 335–348 | Cite as

The Division of Paid Labor in Same-Sex Couples in the Netherlands

  • Eva JaspersEmail author
  • Ellen Verbakel
Original Article


This study examines the division of paid labor among gay male and lesbian couples in the Netherlands. We hypothesize that same-sex couples have a more equal division of paid labor than different-sex couples, partly because of lower marriage and fertility rates, and partly because equity norms are more strongly embraced regardless of family stage. Furthermore, we expect that traditional gender roles result in more hours of paid work by gay male couples than lesbian couples. Descriptive and OLS regression analyses are carried out on 13 waves of the Dutch Labor Force Surveys (1994–2007), which include 998 gay male couples and 1,033 lesbian couples. Results support all hypotheses: same-sex couples divide paid labor more equally than different-sex couples; lesbian couples specialize less after marriage or childbirth; and gay male couples work more hours than lesbian couples. We discuss how our findings can be translated across countries.


Same-sex couples Gender roles Working hours The Netherlands Survey research 


  1. Amato, P. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 650–666. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antecol, H., Jong, A., & Steinberger, M. (2008). The sexual orientation wage gap: The role of occupational sorting and human capital. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 61, 518–543.Google Scholar
  3. Badgett, M. V. L. (1995). The wage effects of sexual orientation discrimination. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 48, 726–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badgett, M. V. L. (2009). When gay people get married. What happens when societies legalize same-sex marriage. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bjarnason, T., & Hjalmsdottir, A. (2008). Egalitarian attitudes towards the division of household labor among adolescents in Iceland. Sex Roles, 59, 49–60. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9428-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black, D. A., Gates, G., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L. (2000). Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources. Demography, 37, 139–154. doi: 10.2307/2648117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, D. A., Makar, H. R., Sanders, S. G., & Taylor, L. J. (2003). The earnings effects of sexual orientation. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 56, 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, sex. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  11. Booth, A., & Amato, P. (1994). Parental gender role nontraditionalism and offspring outcomes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 865–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. The American Journal of Sociology, 3, 652–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1984). The balance of power in lesbian relationships. Sex Roles, 10, 587–699. doi: 10.1007/BF00287267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CBS. (2002). Homoparen [Gay couples]. Index, 10, 4–5.Google Scholar
  15. Chan, R. W., Brooks, R. C., Raboy, B., & Patterson, C. J. (1998). Division of labor among lesbian and heterosexual parents: Associations with children’s adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 402–419. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.12.3.402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ciano-Boyce, C., & Shelley-Sireci, L. (2002). Who is mommy tonight? Lesbian parenting issues. Journal of Homosexuality, 43, 1–13. doi: 10.1300/J082v43n02_01.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cunningham, M. (2001). Parental influences on the gendered division of housework. American Sociological Review, 66, 184–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Ruijter, J. M. P., Van Doorne-Huiskes, A., & Schippers, J. J. (2003). Size and causes of the occupational gender wage-gap in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 19, 345–360. doi: 10.1093/esr/19.4.345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elmslie, B., & Tebaldi, E. (2007). Sexual orientation and labor market discrimination. Journal of Labor Research, 28, 436–453. doi: 10.1007/s12122-007-9006-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender: A social, economic, and demographic view. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  22. Euwals, R., Knoef, M., & Van Vuuren, D. (2011). The trend in female labour force participation: What can be expected for the future? Empirical Economics, 40, 729–753. doi: 10.1007/s00181-010-0364-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fulcher, M., Sutfin, E. L., & Patterson, C. J. (2008). Individual differences in gender development: Associations with parental sexual orientation, attitudes and division of labor. Sex Roles, 58, 330–341. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9348-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751–767. doi: 10.1177/000312240406900601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldberg, A. E., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2007). The division of labor and perceptions of parental roles: Lesbian couples across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 297–318. doi: 10.1177/0265407507075415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 322–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00322.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hekma, G. (2004). Homoseksualiteit in Nederland van 1730 tot de moderne tijd [Homosexuality in the Netherlands from 1730 until modern times]. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff Companion.Google Scholar
  28. Hook, J. L. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review, 71, 639–660. doi: 10.1177/000312240607100406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inglehart, R. F. (2008). Changing values among western publics from 1970–2006. West European Politics, 31, 130–146. doi: 10.1080/01402380701834747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jaspers, E., Lubbers, M., & De Graaf, N. D. (2007). ‘Horrors of Holland’. Explaining attitude change towards euthanasia and homosexuals in the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 451–473. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edm029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jepsen, L. K., & Jepsen, C. A. (2002). An empirical analysis of the matching patterns of same-sex and different-sex couples. Demography, 39, 435–453. doi: 10.1353/dem.2002.0027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kalmijn, M., Loeve, A., & Manting, D. (2007). Income dynamics in couples and the dissolution of marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 44, 159–179. doi: 10.1353/dem.2007.0005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelley, J. (2001). Attitudes towards homosexuality in 29 nations. Australian Social Monitor, 4, 15–22.Google Scholar
  34. Keuzenkamp, S., Kooiman, N., & Van Lisdonk, J. (2012). Niet te ver uit de kast. Ervaringen van homo- en biseksuelen in Nederland. [Just don’t stand out. Acceptance of homosexuality in the eyes of the target group]. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau [The Netherlands Institute for Social Research].Google Scholar
  35. Korenman, S., & Neumark, D. (1991). Does marriage really make men more productive? Journal of Human Resources, 26, 282–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Korenman, S., & Neumark, D. (1992). Marriage, motherhood and wages. Journal of Human Resources, 27, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kösters, L., Den Boer, P., & Lodder, B. (2009). CBS-berichten: Veranderingen in de arbeidsparticipatie in Nederland sinds 1970 [Changes in labor market participation in the Netherlands since 1970]. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken [Journal for Labor Issues], 25, 312–317.Google Scholar
  38. Kurdek, L. A. (2007). The allocation of household labor by partners in gay and lesbian couples. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 132–148. doi: 10.1177/0192513X06292019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kurdek, L. A., & Schmitt, J. P. (1987). Partner homogamy in married, heterosexual cohabiting, gay, and lesbian couples. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 212–232. doi: 10.1080/00224498709551358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuyper, L. (2006). Seksualiteit en seksuele gezondheid bij homo- en biseksuelen [Sexuality and Sexual Health of Homosexual and Bisexual People]. In F. Bakker & I. Vanwesenbeeck (Eds.), Seksuele Gezondheid in Nederland 2006 [Sexual Health in the Netherlands 2006] (pp. 167–188). Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  41. Lubbers, M., Jaspers, E., & Ultee, W. (2009). Primary and secondary socialization impacts on support for same-sex marriage after legalization in the Netherlands. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 1714–1745. doi: 10.1177/0192513X09334267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moore, M. R. (2008). Gendered power relations among women: A study of household decision making in black, lesbian stepfamilies. American Sociological Review, 73, 335–356. doi: 10.1177/000312240807300208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neve, R. J. M. (2002). Changes in attitudes toward women’s emancipation in the Netherlands over two decades: Unraveling a trend. Social Science Research, 24, 167–187. doi: 10.1006/ssre.1995.1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Patterson, C. J. (1995). Families of the lesbian baby boom: Parents’ division of labor and children’s adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 31, 115–123. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.1.115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Poortman, A., & Van der Lippe, T. (2009). Attitudes towards housework and child care and the gendered division of labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 71, 526–541. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00617.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Portegijs, W., & Keuzenkamp, S. (2008). Nederland deeltijdland. Vrouwen en deeltijdwerk. [The Netherlands: Part-time work country. Women and part-time work]. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau [The Netherlands Institute for Social Research].Google Scholar
  47. Schwartz, C. R., & Graf, N. L. (2009). Assortative matching among same-sex and different-sex couples in the United States, 1990-2000. Demographic Research, 21, 843–878. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2009.21.28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299–322. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., Balsam, K. F. (2005). Money, housework, sex, and conflict: Same-sex couples in civil unions, those not in civil unions, and heterosexual married siblings. Sex Roles, 52, 561–575. doi:  10.1007/s11199-005-3725-7.
  50. Stacey, J., & Biblarz, T. J. (2001). (How) Does the sexual orientation of parents matter? American Sociological Review, 66, 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sullivan, M. (1996). Rozzie and Harriet? Gender and family patterns of lesbian coparents. Gender and Society, 10, 747–767. doi: 10.1177/089124396010006005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tielmans, R. (1982). Homoseksualiteit in Nederland. Studie van een emancipatiebeweging [Homosexuality in the Netherlands. The study of an emancipation movement]. Meppel: Boom.Google Scholar
  53. Van der Lippe, T., de Ruijter, E., de Ruijter, J., & Raub, W. (2011). Persistent inequalities in time use between men and women: A detailed look at the influence of economic circumstances, policies, and culture. European Sociological Review, 27, 164–179. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Verbakel, E. (2010). Partner’s resources and adjusting working hours in the Netherlands: Differences over time, between levels of human capital, and over the family-cycle. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 1324–1362. doi: 10.1177/0192513X09360188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Verbakel, E. (2012). Occupational status of gay men and lesbians in the Netherlands: How to explain the gap with heterosexual men and women? Social Science Research, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  56. Verbakel, E. & Kalmijn, M. (2011, April). Educational assortative mating among gay male, lesbian, and cohabiting or married heterosexual couples in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the RC28 Spring Meeting, Colchester, United Kingdom.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology/ICSUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Sociology/ICSRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations