Sex Roles

, Volume 67, Issue 11–12, pp 659–669 | Cite as

Social Dominance Orientation Relates to Believing Men Should Dominate Sexually, Sexual Self-Efficacy, and Taking Free Female Condoms Among Undergraduate Women and Men

  • Lisa Rosenthal
  • Sheri R. Levy
  • Valerie A. Earnshaw
Original Article

Abstract

Gendered-based power affects heterosexual relationships, with beliefs in the U.S. prescribing that men dominate women sexually. We draw on social dominance theory to examine whether women’s and men’s level of support for group-based hierarchy (i.e., social dominance orientation; SDO) helps explain gender-based power beliefs and dynamics in heterosexual relationships. We conducted a laboratory study at a Northeastern U.S. university among 357 women and 126 men undergraduates who reported being heterosexual and sexually active, testing three sets of hypotheses. First, as hypothesized, women endorsed SDO and the belief that men should dominate sexually less than men did. Second, as hypothesized, among women and men, SDO was positively correlated with the belief that men should dominate sexually, and negatively correlated with sexual self-efficacy (confidence in sexual situations) and number of female condoms (a woman-controlled source of protection) taken. Third, structural equation modeling, controlling for age, family income, number of sexual partners in the past month, and perceived HIV/AIDS risk, supported the hypothesis that among women and men, the belief that men should dominate sexually mediates SDO’s association with sexual self-efficacy. The hypothesis that the belief that men should dominate sexually mediates SDO’s association with number of female condoms taken was supported for women only. The hypothesis that sexual self-efficacy mediates SDO’s association with number of female condoms taken was not supported. Results suggest SDO influences power beliefs and dynamics in heterosexual relationships. Although female condoms are an important woman-controlled source of protection, power-related beliefs may pose a challenge to their use.

Keywords

Female condoms Gender Power Sexual risk behavior Sexual self-efficacy Social dominance orientation Women 

References

  1. Amaro, H. (1995). Love, sex, and power: Considering women’s realities in HIV prevention. American Psychologist, 50, 437–447. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.6.437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beadnell, B., Baker, S. A., Morrison, D. M., & Knox, K. (2000). HIV/STD risk factors for women with violent male partners. Sex Roles, 42, 661–689. doi:10.1023/A:1007003623810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biello, K. B., Sipsma, H. L., Ickovics, J. R., & Kershaw, T. (2010). Economic dependence and unprotected sex: The role of sexual assertiveness among young urban mothers. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 87, 416–425. doi:10.1007/s11524-010-9449-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowleg, L., Lucas, K. J., & Tschann, J. M. (2004). “The ball was always in his court”: An exploratory analysis of relationship scripts, sexual scripts, and condom use among African American women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 70–82. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00124.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabral, R. J., Posner, S. F., Macaluso, M., Artz, L. M., Johnson, C., & Pulley, L. (2003). Do main partner conflict, power dynamics, and control over use of male condoms predict subsequent use of the female condom? Women & Health, 38, 37–52. doi:10.1300/J013v38n01_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi, K.-H., Wojcicki, J., & Valencia-Garcia, D. (2004). Introducing and negotiating the use of female condoms in sexual relationships: Qualitative interviews with women attending a family planning clinic. AIDS and Behavior, 8, 251–261. doi:10.1023/B:AIBE.0000044073.74932.6f.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christopher, A. N., & Wojda, M. R. (2008). Social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, sexism and prejudice towards women in the workforce. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 65–73. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00407.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, S., Bruce, J., & Dude, A. (2006). Protecting young women from HIV/AIDS: The case against child and adolescent marriage. International Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 79–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cupitt, C. (1998). Sexual History Questionnaire. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. E. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 106–108). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Gollub, E. L. (2000). The female condom: Tool for women’ empowerment. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1377–1381. doi:10.2105/AJPH.90.9.1377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heaven, P. C. L. (1999). Attitudes toward women’s rights: Relationships with social dominance orientation and political group identities. Sex Roles, 41, 605–614. doi:10.1023/A:1018851606423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoffman, S., Mantell, J., Exner, T., & Stein, Z. (2004). The future of the female condom. International Family Planning Perspectives, 30, 139–145. doi:10.1363/3612004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hollander, D. (2002). Female condom use rises if women receive good instruction and training. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34, 169–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones, J., & Muehlenhard, C. (1990). Using education to prevent rape on college campuses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  15. Kline, R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kowalewski, M. R., Henson, K. D., & Longshore, D. (1997). Rethinking perceived risk and health behavior: A critical review of HIV prevention research. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 313–325. doi:10.1177/109019819702400305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pratto, F., & Walker, A. (2004). The bases of gendered power. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 242–268). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  18. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenthal, L., & Levy, S. R. (2010). Understanding women’s risk for HIV infection using social dominance theory and the four bases of gendered power. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 21–35. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01538.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosenthal, D., Moore, S., & Flynn, I. (1991). Adolescent self-efficacy, self-esteem and sexual risk-taking. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 77–88. doi:10.1002/casp.2450010203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565–573. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sanchez, D. T., Kiefer, A. K., & Ybarra, O. (2006). Sexual submissiveness in women: Costs for sexual autonomy and arousal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1–13. doi:10.1177/0146167205282154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schooler, D., & Ward, L. M. (2006). Average Joes: Men’s relationships with media, real bodies, and sexuality. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 7, 27–41. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.7.1.27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schooler, D., Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., & Caruthers, A. S. (2005). Cycles of shame: Menstrual shame, body shame, and sexual decision-making. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 324–334. doi:10.1080/00224490509552288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scott, K. D., Gilliam, A., & Braxton, K. (2005). Culturally competent HIV prevention strategies for women of color in the United States. Health Care for Women International, 26, 17–45. doi:10.1080/07399330590885795.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Duckitt, J. (2007). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160–172. doi:10.1177/0146167206294745.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)/United Nations Population Fund/United Nations Development Fund for Women. (2004). Women and HIV/AIDS: Confronting the crisis. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Google Scholar
  29. United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). (2010). Global Report: UNAIDS Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic 2010.Google Scholar
  30. Walsch, J. L., & Ward, M. (2010). Magazine reading and involvement and young adults’ sexual health knowledge, efficacy, and behaviors. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 285–300. doi:10.1080/00224490902916009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weeks, M. R., Li, J., Coman, E., Abbott, M., Sylla, L., Corbett, M., & Dickson-Gomez, J. (2010). Multilevel social influences on female condom use and adoption among women in the urban United States. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 24, 297–309. doi:10.1089/apc.2009.0312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wingood, G. M., & DiClemente, R. J. (2000). Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 539–565. doi:10.1177/109019810002700502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa Rosenthal
    • 1
  • Sheri R. Levy
    • 2
  • Valerie A. Earnshaw
    • 1
  1. 1.Yale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations