Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 67, Issue 1–2, pp 58–68 | Cite as

Emotional Reactions to Observing Misogyny: Examining the Roles of Gender, Forecasting, Political Orientation, and Religiosity

  • George B. Cunningham
  • Kathi Miner
  • Claudia Benavides-Espinoza
Original Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the reactions of women and men who observe misogyny. The authors examined the emotional distress associated with observing misogyny, and the degree to which this varied based on (a) reading about or actually observing the incivility, (b) political orientation, and (c) religiosity. Participants (n = 205 US college students) took part in a between subjects experiment where they either heard or read about one of two scenarios: two men making a disparaging comment about a woman while she was out of the room, or a situation in which no comment was made. Results indicate that women, but not men, overestimated their emotional distress to observing misogyny. For women, but not men, whether or not the misogynistic comment was heard also interacted with religiosity to predict emotional distress. Political orientation did not have an effect on women and men’s reactions. The authors discuss contributions and implications.

Keywords

Misogyny Incivility Religion Political orientation Affective forecasting 

References

  1. Ahrold, T. K., & Meston, C. M. (2010). Ethnic differences in sexual attitudes of US college students: Gender, acculturation, and religiosity factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 190–202. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9406-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian spector. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, D. D., Terpstra, D. E., & Larntz, K. (1990). The influence of individual characteristics and severity of harassing behavior on reactions to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 22, 305–325. doi: 10.1007/BF00288336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barling, J., Dekker, I., Loughlin, C. A., Kelloway, E. K., Fullager, C., & Johnson, D. (1996). Prediction and replication of the organizational and personal consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11, 4–25. doi: 10.1108/02683949610124771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baynard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., & Plante, E. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 463–481. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benavides-Espinoza, C., & Cunningham, G. B. (2010a). Bystanders’ reactions to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 63, 201–213. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9781-d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benavides-Espinoza, C., & Cunningham, G. B. (2010b). Observers’ reporting of sexual harassment: The influence of harassment type, organizational culture, and political orientation. Public Organization Review, 10, 323–337. doi: 10.1007/s11115-009-0109-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergman, M. E., Langhout, R. D., Palmieri, P. A., Cortina, L. M., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2002). The (Un)reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 230–242. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowes-Sperry, L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2005). To act or not to act: The dilemma faced by sexual harassment observers. Academy of Management Review, 30, 288–306. doi: 10.2307/20159120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowes-Sperry, L., & Powell, G. N. (1999). Observers’ reactions to social-sexual behavior at work: An ethical decision making perspective. Journal of Management, 25, 779–802. doi: 10.1177/014920639902500601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  13. Chan, D. K. S., Lam, C. B., Chow, S. Y., & Cheung, S. F. (2008). Examining the job-related, psychological, and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 362–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00451.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, A. B., Malka, A., Hill, E. D., Thoemmes, F., Hill, P. C., & Sundie, J. M. (2009). Race as a moderator of the relationship between religiosity and political alignment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 271–282. doi: 10.1177/0146167208328064.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cokley, K. O., Tran, K., Hall-Clark, B., Chapman, C., Bessa, L., Finley, A., & Martinez, M. (2010). Predicting student attitudes about racial diversity and gender equity. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3, 187–199. doi: 10.1037/a0020467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (2004). Reading 11. The origins and meanings of liberal/conservative self-identifications. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology. Key readings in social psychology (pp. 200–216). NY: Psychology.Google Scholar
  18. Cunningham, G. B. (2008). Creating and sustaining gender diversity in sport organizations. Sex Roles, 58, 136–145. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9312-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cunningham, G. B., & Benavides-Espinoza, C. (2008). A trend analysis of sexual harassment claims: 1992–2006. Psychological Reports, 103, 779–782. doi: 10.2466/pr0.103.3.779-782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunn, E. W., & Ashton-James, C. (2008). On emotional accuracy: Predicted and actual affective responses to grand-scale tragedies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 692–698. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fitzpatrick Bettencourt, K. E., Vacha-Haase, T., & Byrne, Z. S. (2011). Older and younger adults’ attitudes toward feminism: The influence of religiosity, political orientation, gender, education, and family. Sex Roles, 64, 863–874. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9946-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glomb, T. M., Richman, W. L., Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., Schneider, K. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 309–328. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace: Impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexual’s attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.3f.1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hitlan, R. T., Schneider, K. T., & Walsh, B. M. (2006). Upsetting behavior: Reactions to personal and bystander sexual harassment experiences. Sex Roles, 55, 187–195. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9072-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kawakami, K., Dunn, E., Karmali, F., & Dovidio, J. F. (2009). Mispredicting affective and behavioral responses to racism. Science, 323, 276–278. doi: 10.1126/science.1164951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces, 13, 230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Levine, M., & Crowther, S. (2008). The responsive bystander: How social group membership and group size can encourage as well as inhibit bystander intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1429–1439. doi: 10.1037/a0012634.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lord, R. G., & Kanfer, R. (2002). Emotions and organizational behavior. In R. Lord, R. Klimoski, & R. Kanfer (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: Understanding the structure and role of emotions in organizational behavior (pp. 1–19). San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Miner-Rubino, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2007). Beyond targets: Consequences of vicarious exposure to misogyny at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1254–1269. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richman-Hirsch, W. L., & Glomb, T. M. (2002). Are men affected by the sexual harassment of women? effects of ambient sexual harassment on men. In J. M. Brett & F. Drasgow (Eds.), The psychology of work: Theoretically based empirical research (pp. 121–140). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Saguy, A. C. (2000). Employment discrimination or sexual violence?: Defining sexual harassment in American and French law. Law and Society Review, 34, 1091–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saguy, A. C. (2002). International crossways: Traffic in sexual harassment policy. The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 9, 249–267. doi: 10.1177/1350506802009003374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strauss, J. P., & Sawyerr, O. O. (2009). Religiosity and attitudes toward diversity: A potential workplace conflict? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2626–2650. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00541.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me—what did you just say?! women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68–88. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A., III. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in supervisor-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wasti, S., Bergman, M. E., Glomb, T. M., & Drasgow, F. (2000). Test of the cross-cultural generalizability of a model of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 766–778. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.766.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes, and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 1–74.Google Scholar
  42. Willness, C. R., Steel, P., & Lee, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology, 60, 127–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00067.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson, J. (1978). Religion in American society. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 345–411. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(03)01006-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilson, T. D., Wheatley, T. P., Meyers, J. M., Gilbert, D. T., & Axsom, D. (2000). Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 821–836. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.821.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Woodzicka, J. A., & LaFrance, M. (2001). Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 15–30. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • George B. Cunningham
    • 1
  • Kathi Miner
    • 2
  • Claudia Benavides-Espinoza
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratory for Diversity in Sport, Department of Health and KinesiologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and Women’s and Gender Studies ProgramTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.Department of Exercise ScienceArkansas State UniversityJonesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations