Sex Roles

, Volume 68, Issue 11–12, pp 768–778 | Cite as

Anti-Asian Sentiment Amongst a Sample of White Australian Men on Gaydar

  • Damien W. Riggs
Original Article


Whilst the homogenizing descriptor ‘gay’ is often used in a singular sense to refer to ‘the gay community,’ research has increasingly recognized that individuals within gay communities are as diverse as they are within the broader community. Importantly, recognition of this diversity requires an acknowledgement of the fact that, just as in the broader community, discrimination occurs within gay communities. The present study sought to examine the degree to which racism occurs within gay men’s online communities (in the form of anti-Asian sentiment expressed in the profiles of a small number of the 60,082 White Australian gay men living in five major Australian states whose profiles were listed on the website during October 2010), the forms that such racism takes, and whether any White gay men resisted such racism. The findings report on a thematic and subsequent rhetorical analysis of the profiles of the sub-sample of 403 White gay men who expressed anti-Asian sentiment. Such sentiment, it was found, was expressed in four distinct ways: 1) the construction of racism as ‘personal preference,’ 2) the construction of Asian gay men as not ‘real men,’ 3) the construction of Asian gay men as a ‘type,’ and 4) the assumption that saying ‘sorry’ renders anti-Asian sentiment somehow acceptable. Whilst the numbers of White gay men expressing anti-Asian sentiment were relatively small, it is suggested that the potential impact of anti-Asian sentiment upon Asian gay men who view such profiles may be considerable, and thus that this phenomenon requires ongoing examination.


Gaydar White gay men Asian gay men Anti-Asian sentiment Australia Rhetorical analysis Racial marginalization Discrimination 


  1. Augoustinos, M., Tuffin, K., & Every, D. (2005). New racism, meritocracy and individualism: Constraining affirmative action in education. Discourse and Society, 16, 315–339. doi: 10.1177/0957926505051168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boldero, J. (2004). Understanding cultural differences in safe-sex behaviour: The experience of gay Asian Australians. In D. W. Riggs & G. A. Walker (Eds.), Out in the antipodes: Australian and New Zealand perspectives on gay and lesbian issues in psychology (pp. 267–292). Perth: Brightfire.Google Scholar
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caluya, G. (2006). The (gay) scene of racism: Face, shame and gay Asian males. ACRAWSA e-journal, 2(2). Retrieved from
  5. Campbell, J. E. (2004). Getting it on online: Cyberspace, gay male sexuality, and embodied identity. New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, V., Ellis, S. E., Peel, E., & Riggs, D. W. (2010). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer psychology: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowlishaw, G. (1999). Rednecks, eggheads, and blackfellas: Racial power and intimacy in north Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  8. Crenshaw, K. M. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drummond, M. (2005). Asian gay men’s bodies. Journal of Men’s Studies, 13, 291–300. doi: 10.3149/jms.1303.291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fraser, V. (2009). Online bodies and sexual subjectivities: In whose image? In B. Baird & D. W. Riggs (Eds.), The racial politics of bodies, nations and knowledges (pp. 116–132). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  11. Han, A. (2006) ‘I think you’re the smartest race I’ve ever met’: Racialised economies of gay desire. ACRAWSA e-journal, 2(2). Retrieved from
  12. Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., & Levine, M. (1997). On the parallels between social cognition and the ‘new racism’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 305–329. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01134.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Light, B., Fletcher, G., & Adam, A. (2008). Gay men, gaydar and the commodification of difference. Information Technology and People, 21, 300–314. doi: 10.1108/09593840810896046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mowlabocus, S. (2010). Gaydar culture: Gay men, technology and embodiment in the digital age. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  15. Payne, R. (2007). Gay scene, queer grid. Queer space: Centres and peripheries conference proceedings. Retrieved from
  16. Phua, V. C. (2007). Contesting and maintaining hegemonic masculinities: Gay Asian American men in mate selection. Sex Roles, 57, 909–918. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9318-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Raj, S. (2011). Grindring bodies: Racial and affective economies of online queer desire. Critical Race and Whiteness Studies, 7, 55–67.Google Scholar
  19. Rapley, M. (1998). ‘Just an ordinary Australian’: Self-categorisation and the discursive construction of facticity in ‘new racist’ political rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 325–344. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01175.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rapley, M. (2001). ‘How to do X without doing Y’: Accomplishing discrimination without ‘being racist’—‘doing equity’. In M. Augoustinos & K. J. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding prejudice, racism, and social conflict (pp. 231–250). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Richards, G. (1997). ‘Race’, racism and psychology: Towards a reflexive history. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Ridge, D., Hee, A., & Minichiello, V. (1999). ‘Asian’ men on the scene: Challenges to ‘gay community’. In P. Jackson & G. Sullivan (Eds.), Multicultural queer: Australian narratives (pp. 43–68). New York: Harrington Park.Google Scholar
  23. Riggs, D. W. (2007). Recognising race in LGBT psychology: Privilege, power & complicity. In V. Clarke & E. Peel (Eds.), Out in psychology: Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender perspectives (pp. 59–76). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Riggs, D. W., & Augoustinos, M. (2005). The psychic life of colonial power: Racialised subjectivities, bodies and methods. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 445–467. doi: 10.1002/casp.838.Google Scholar
  25. Riggs, D. W., & Choi, P. Y. L. (2006). Heterosexism, racism and psychology: Challenging or colluding with privilege? The Psychologist, 19, 288–291.Google Scholar
  26. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  27. Warner, L. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59, 454–463. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social and Policy StudiesFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations