Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 65, Issue 3–4, pp 156–164 | Cite as

Sexualizing Sarah Palin

The Social and Political Context of the Sexual Objectification of Female Candidates
  • Caroline Heldman
  • Lisa Wade
Feminist Forum

Abstract

Using Sarah Palin’s candidacy for the vice-presidency, Heflick and Goldenberg (2011) empirically link female sexual objectification with the negative perceptions and poor performances of female candidates. We argue that the authors undersell the importance of their findings, especially considering shifts in the content and ubiquitousness of mass media. Advances in communication technologies have enabled a new era of objectification, marked by an increasing presence and acceptance of sexual objectification in media, greater pornographic content in mainstream media, and greater acceptance of pornography in U.S. society more broadly. In the years since U.S. scholars began critiquing sexual objectification, its normalization and degree of penetration into our daily lives have increased, largely due to a proliferation of marketing and entertainment media images enabled by the Internet and other communication technology. Given this new era of objectification, we conclude that the phenomenon identified by Heflick and Goldenberg is more likely to influence the success of female politicians now than it was in the 1970s (when the sexual objectification of women was first problematized) and that it may also help explain the recent stagnation in U.S. progress towards gender equity in political representation.

Keywords

Sarah Palin Objectification Self-objectification Female candidates Hillary Clinton Geraldine Ferraro Elizabeth Dole 

References

  1. Abrams, D. (2007, September 25). Congress examines hip-hop language. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-09-25-hip-hopcongress_n.htm?loc=interstitialskip.
  2. Adler, A. M. (2008). All porn all the time. New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers (Paper 67). Retrieved from http://ecmappdlv03.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__review_of_law_and_social_change/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063989.pdf
  3. Alfonso, R., & Trigilio, J. (1997). Surfing the third-wave: A dialogue between two third-wave feminists. Hypatia, 12, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls (2010). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-full.pdf.
  5. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2009). Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.surgery.org/media/statistics.
  6. Barron, M., & Kimmel, M. S. (2000). Sexual violence in three pornographic media: Toward a sociological explanation. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Behm-Morawitz, E., & Mastro, D. (2009). The effects of the sexualization of female video game characters on gender stereotyping and female self-concept. Sex Roles, 61, 808–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, L., & Entman, R. (2001). Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blackman, C. (2010, February 25). Can avatars change the way we think and act? Retrieved from http://vhil.stanford.edu/news/2010/stanford-avatars-think.pdf.
  10. Bucholtz, M. (2008, Winter). Gender, consumption, and interaction among American youth. Revista de Sociolingüística, 1–8. Retrieved from http://www6.gencat.net/llengcat/noves/hm08hivern/docs/bucholtz.pdf.
  11. Burrell, B. (1994). A woman’s place is in the house. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burrell, B. (1998). Campaign finance: Women’s experience in the modern era. In S. Thomas & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Women and elective office: Past, present, and future (pp. 26–37). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bystrom, D. G., Banwart, M. C., Kaid, L. K., & Robertson, T. A. (2004). Gender and candidate communication: Videostyle, webstyle, newstyle. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Carroll, S. J., & Jenkins, K. (2001, August–September). Increasing diversity or more of the same? Term limits and the representation of women, minorities, and minority women in the state legislatures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, J. S., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Nelson, L. J., Oldon, C. D., McNamara Barry, C., & Madsen, S. D. (2008). Generation XXX: Pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 6–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Center for American Women and Politics (2010a). Women in the U.S. congress 2010. Retrieved from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/documents/cong.pdf.
  18. Center for American Women and Politics (2010b). Women serving in the 111th congress: 2009–11. Retrieved from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/Congress-Current.php.
  19. Center for American Women and Politics (2010c). Statewide elective executive women: 1969–2007. Retrieved from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/research/information_by_level_of_office/documents/stwide07.pdf.
  20. Centre for International Communications Research (2008). Socialisation of global sexually explicit imagery: Challenges to regulation and research. Retrieved from http://sgsei.wordpress.com/.
  21. Coffman, K. G., & Odlyzko, A. M. (1998). Growth of the internet. In I. P. Kaminow & T. Li (Eds.), Optical fiber telecommunications IV: B systems and impairments (Vol. 2, pp. 17–56). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  22. Cosper, D. (1997). Shock value. Print, 51, 38–40.Google Scholar
  23. Crerand, C., & Sarwer, D. B. (2010). Cosmetic treatment and body dysmorphic disorder. Psychiatric Annals, 40, 344–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cross, G. (2000). An all-consuming century: Why commercialism won in modern America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Dahl, D. W., Frankenberger, K. D., & Manchanda, R. V. (2003). Does it pay to shock? Reactions to shocking and nonshocking advertising content among university students. Journal of Advertising Research, 43, 268–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deutsch, N. L. & Theodorou, E. (2009). Aspiring, consuming, becoming: Youth identity in a culture of consumption. Youth and society. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0044118X09351279
  27. Devitt, J. (1999). Framing gender on the campaign trail: Women’s executive leadership and the press. Retrieved from http://198.65.255.167/v2/researchandreports/framinggender/Framing_Gender_Report.pdf.
  28. Duerst-Lahti, G. (1998). The bottleneck, women as candidates. In S. Thomas & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Women and elective office (pp. 15–25). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Dworkin, A. (1981). Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  30. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85, 63.Google Scholar
  31. Esch, K., & Mayer, V. (2007). How unprofessional: The profitable partnership of amateur porn and celebrity culture. In K. Nikunen, S. Paasonen, & L. Saarenmaa (Eds.), Pornification: Sex and sexuality in media culture (pp. 99–111). New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  32. Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  33. Farrar-Myers, V. (2007). Money and the art and science of candidate viability. In L. Han & C. Heldman (Eds.), Rethinking madame president: Are we ready for a woman in the white house? (pp. 113–132). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  34. Ferriss, S., & Young, M. (2010). Marie Antoinette: Fashion, third-wave feminism, and chick culture. Literature Film Quarterly, 38, 98–116.Google Scholar
  35. Fisher, D., Hill, D. L., Grube, J. W., & Gruber, E. L. (2004, December). Sex on American television: An analysis across program genres and network types. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 48, 529–553.Google Scholar
  36. Ford, J. B., Latour, M. S., & Lundstrom, W. J. (1991). Contemporary women’s evaluation of female role portrayals in advertising. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 8, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fox, R. L., Lawless, J. L., & Feeley, C. (2001). Gender and the decision to run for office. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26, 411–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gilmartin, P. (2001). Still the angel in the household: Political cartoons of Elizabeth Dole’s presidential campaign. Women and Politics, 22, 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goldberg, M. (2001, January 8). Feminism for sale. Alternet. Retrieved from http://www.alternet.org/story/10306/.
  41. Greenberg, B. S., & Busselle, R. W. (1994). Soap operas and sexual activity. Menlo Park: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  42. Hallerman, D. (2007). U.S. advertising spending. Retrieved from http://www.emarketer.com/Report.aspx?code=emarketer_2000442.
  43. Hamilton, L. (2007). Trading on heterosexuality: College women’s gender strategies and homophobia. Gender & Society, 21, 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Heflick, N. A., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2010). Sarah Palin, a nation object(ifie)s: The role of appearance focus in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9901-4
  45. Heldman, C. (2008). Cultural barriers to a female presidency in the U.S. In L. Han & C. Heldman (Eds.), Rethinking madame president: Are we ready for a woman in the white house? (pp. 17–42). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  46. Heldman, C., & Cahill, M. (2007, March). The beast of beauty culture: The political effects of self-objectification. Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Las Vegas, Nevada.Google Scholar
  47. Heldman, C., Carroll, S. J., & Olson, S. (2005). She brought only a skirt: Print media coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s bid for the republican nomination. Political Communication, 22, 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Heldman, C., Oliver, S., & Conroy, M. (2009, September). From Ferraro to Palin: Sexism in media coverage of vice presidential candidates. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  49. Hogeland, L. M. (2001). Against generational thinking, or, some things that ‘third wave’ feminism isn’t. Women’s Studies in Communication, 24, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Internet World Stats (2011). Usage and population statistics. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/.
  51. Ivory, J. D. (2006). Still a man’s game: Gender representation in online review of video games. Mass Community & Society, 9, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jhally, S. (2000). Advertising at the edge of the apocalypse. In R. Anderson & L. Strate (Eds.), Critical studies in media commercialism (pp. 27–39). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Kahn, K. F. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman: How stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kaiser Family Foundation (2002). Teens say sex on TV influences behavior of peers [press release], Retrieved from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&PageID=14062.
  55. Karp, M., & Stoller, D. (1999). The bust guide to the new girl order. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  56. Kennedy, P. (2008, June 8). Craft addicts: Do online games trigger a new psychiatric disorder? Retrieved from http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/06/08/craft_addicts/?page=1.
  57. Keveney, B. (2001, February 7). There’s more sex on TV, but little about risks. USA Today, p. 6D.Google Scholar
  58. Kilbourne, J. (2010). Bitch podcast. Retrieved from http://bitchmagazine.org/post/mad-world-the-podcast.
  59. Kistler, M. E., & Lee, M. J. (2009). Does exposure to sexual hip-hop music videos influence the sexual attitudes of college students? Mass Communication & Society, 13, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kunkel, D., Cope, K. M., & Colvin, C. (1996). Sexual messages on family hour television: Content and context. Oakland: Children Now and Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  61. Lawless, J., & Fox, R. (2006). It takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Lawless, J. (2010, November 3). NOT the “year of the woman.” Retrieved from http://www.doublex.com/blog/xxfactor/not-year-woman.
  63. Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. Melbourne: Schwartz.Google Scholar
  64. MacKinnon, C. (1979). Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Media Awareness Network (2005). Young Canadians in a wired world—Phase II overview. Retrieved from http://www.media-awareness.ca/english/research/YCWW/phaseII/.
  66. Media Matters (2007, October 3). From cleavage to “cackle”? Media find new focus in coverage of Hillary Clinton. Retrieved from http://mediamatters.org/research/200710040003.
  67. Miller, M. K., & Summers, A. (2007). Gender differences in video game characters’ roles, appearances, and attire as portrayed in video game magazines. Sex Roles, 57, 733–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Montgomery, K. (2007). Generation digital: Politics, commerce, and childhood in the age of the Internet. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  69. Mosher, W., Chandra, A., & Jones, J. (2005). Sexual behavior and selected health measures: Men and women 15–44 years of age, United States. Advance Data, 362, 1–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Munford, R. (2007). “Wake up and smell the lipgloss”: Gender, generation and the (a)politics of girl power. In S. Gillis, G. Howie, & R. Munford (Eds.), Third wave feminism: A critical exploration (pp. 266–279). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  71. Neilsenwire (2009, July 6). Video game engagement at an all-time high during recession. Retrieved from http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/video-game-engagement-at-all-time-high-during-recession/.
  72. Nielsen (2010a). Mobile snapshot: Smartphones now 28% of U.S. cellphone market. Retrieved from http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/mobile-snapshot-smartphones-now-28-of-u-s-cellphone-market/.
  73. Nielsen (2010b). Smartphones to overtake feature phones in U.S. by 2011. Retrieved from http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/smartphones-to-overtake-feature-phones-in-u-s-by-2011/.
  74. Nikunen, K., Paasonen, S., & Saarenmaa, L. (2007). Pornification: Sex and sexuality in media culture. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  75. Pardun, C. J., L’Engle, K. L., & Brown, J. D. (2005). Linking exposures to outcomes: Early adolescents’ consumption of sexual content in six media. Mass Communication & Society, 8, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Parents Television Council (2010, December). Sexualized teen girls: Tinseltown’s new target. Parents Television Council Special Report, Retrieved from http://www.parentstv.org/FemaleSexualization/Study/Sexualized_Teen_Girls.pdf.
  77. Paul, P. (2005). Pornified: How pornography is transforming our lives, our relationships, and our families. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  78. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2009). Wireless Internet use. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2009/Wireless-Internet-Use-With-Topline.pdf.
  79. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2010). Teens and mobile phones. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP-Teens-and-Mobile-2010-with-topline.pdf.
  80. Potter, J. W. (2004). Theory of media literacy: A cognitive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  81. Reichert, T., & Carpenter, C. (2004). An update on sex in magazine advertising: 1983 To 2003. Journalism &Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 823–837.Google Scholar
  82. Rideout, V. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year olds. Retrieved from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf.
  83. Ropelato, J. (2005). Internet pornography statistics. Retrieved from http://internet-filter-review.toptenreviews.com/internet-pornography-statistics-pg9.html.
  84. Sanbonmatsu, K. (2002). Political parties and the recruitment of women to state legislatures. The Journal of Politics, 64, 791–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sarracino, C., & Scott, K. M. (2008). The porning of America: The rise of porn culture, what it means, and where we go from here. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  86. Scanlon, J. (2009). Sexy from the start: Anticipatory elements of second wave feminism. Women’s Studies, 38, 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Showden, C. (2009). What’s political about the new feminisms? Frontiers: A Journal of Women’s Studies, 30, 166–198.Google Scholar
  88. Silverblatt, A., Ferry, J., & Finan, B. (2009). Approaches to media literacy: A handbook. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.Google Scholar
  89. Snyder, C. (2008). What is third-wave feminism? A new directions essay. Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 34, 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Story, L. (2007, January 15). Anywhere the eye can see, it’s likely to see an ad. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/15/business/media/15everywhere.html.
  91. Strauss, G. (2010, January 20). Sex on TV: It’s increasingly uncut—and unavoidable. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2010-01-20-sexcov20_CV_N.htm.
  92. The Project for Excellence in Journalism (2009). The state of the news media: An annual report on American journalism. Retrieved from http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2010/overview_key_findings.php.
  93. U.S. Census (1999). Computer use in the United States: Population characteristics. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/99pubs/p20-522.pdf.
  94. U.S. Census (2009a). Households with a computer and Internet use: 1984 to 2009. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/computer.html.
  95. U.S. Census (2009b). Homes with cell phones nearly double in first half of decade. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/income_wealth/cb09-174.html.
  96. U.S. Department of Commerce (2010). Exploring the digital nation: Home broadband Internet adoption in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/2010/ESA_NTIA_US_Broadband_Adoption_Report_11082010.pdf.
  97. U.S. Department of Labor (1999, Summer). Computer ownership up sharply in 1990s. Issues in Labor Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/ils/pdf/opbils31.pdf.
  98. Vagnoni, A. (1999, February 8). Something about this advertising. Advertising Age, 30.Google Scholar
  99. Wald, M. L. (1999, January 27). Shock to replace dummies in TV ads on seat belt use. New York Times, p. 12.Google Scholar
  100. Walker, R. (1995). To be real: Telling the truth and changing the face of feminism. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  101. Weaving, C. (2002). Like beauty, exploitation is in the eye of the beholder: An examination of women Olympic athletes posing nude. Sixth international symposium for Olympic research, 209–216. Retrieved from http://www.aafla.org/SportsLibrary/ISOR/ISOR2002za.pdf.
  102. Yao, M. Z., Mahood, C., & Linz, D. (2010). Sexual priming, gender stereotyping, and likelihood to sexually harass: Examining the cognitive effects of playing a sexually-explicit video game. Sex Roles, 61, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Yu, S. L. (2009). Third-wave feminism: A transnational perspective. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 15, 7–25.Google Scholar
  104. Zimmerman, A., & Dahlberg, J. (2008). The sexual objectification of women in advertising: A contemporary cultural perspective. Journal of Advertising Research, 48, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Occidental CollegeLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations