Gender Rules: Same- and Cross-Gender Friendships Norms

Abstract

We examined the relationships between gender and attitudes towards same- and cross-gender friendship norms for a sample of 269 West Coast, U.S., college students. Participants evaluated violations of friendship norms described in vignettes in which the friend’s gender was experimentally manipulated. Women differentiated more between types of violations in their evaluations than did men. There also were several significant gender differences in approval of norm violations. As expected, women tended to have relatively high expectations of their friendships in situations involving trust and intimacy, likely resulting from the high value they placed on affiliation and emotional closeness. Women were more disapproving than men of a friend who canceled plans or failed to come to their defense publicly. Men and women judged a woman who betrayed a secret more harshly than a man. Generally, expectations for cross-gender, versus same-gender, friends were more similar than different; there were no significant cross-gender interactions, with one exception. Men were particularly less approving of a male, as compared to a female, friend who kissed them in a greeting. Furthermore, an overwhelming majority of respondents (81.6%) reported that men and women can be friends. A minority of women were cautious in their responses, with women (18.5%) more apt to reply “maybe,” than men (9.9%). Overall, these findings provided evidence that gender, rather than cross-gender, norms primarily influenced friendship evaluations, and demonstrated that even a subtle manipulation of gender can trigger gender stereotypes. They suggested, too, that women may hold their friends to stricter “rules” than men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Adams, R. G., & Blieszner, R. (1998). Structural predictors of problematic friendship in later life. Personal Relationships, 5, 439–447. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00181.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alves, W. M., & Rossi, P. H. (1978). Who should get what? Fairness judgments of the distribution of earnings. The American Journal of Sociology, 84, 541–564. doi:10.1086/226826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Argyle, M., & Henderson, M. (1984). The rules of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 211–237. doi:10.1177/0265407584012005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bank, B. J., & Hansford, S. L. (2000). Gender and friendship: Why are men’s best same-sex friendships less intimate and supportive? Personal Relationships, 7, 63–78. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00004.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumgarte, R. (2002). Cross-gender friendship: The troublesome relationship. In R. Goodwin & D. Cramer (Eds.), Inappropriate relationships (pp. 103–124). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baumgarte, R., & Nelson, D. W. (2009). Preference for same-versus cross-sex friendships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 901–917. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00465.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bell, R. R. (1981). Worlds of friendship. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bleske, A. L., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Can men and women be just friends? Personal Relationships, 7, 131–151. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00008.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bleske-Rechek, A. L., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1310–1323. doi:10.1177/01461672012710007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blieszner, R., & Adams, R. G. (1992). Adult friendship. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bogle, K. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Booth, A., & Hess, E. (1974). Cross-sex friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 38–47. doi:10.2307/350992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clancey, S. M., & Dollinger, S. J. (1993). Photographic depictions of the self: Gender and age differences in social connectedness. Sex Roles, 29, 477–495. doi:10.1007/BF00289322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duck, S., & Wright, P. H. (1993). Reexamining gender differences in same-gender friendships: A close look at two kinds of data. Sex Roles, 28, 709–727. doi:10.1007/BF00289989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Ecked & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elkins, L. E., & Peterson, C. (1993). Gender differences in best friendships. Sex Roles, 29, 497–508. doi:10.1007/BF00289323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fehr, B. (2004). Intimacy expectations in same-sex friendships: A prototype interaction-pattern model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 265–284. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.265.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Felmlee, D. H. (1999). Social norms in same-and cross-gender friendships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 53–67. doi:10.2307/2695825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Felmlee, D., & Muraco, A. (2009). Gender and friendship norms among older adults. Research on Aging, 31, 318–344. doi:10.1177/0164027508330719.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Finch, J. (1987). Research Note: The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21, 105–114. doi:10.1177/0038038587021001008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fiske, S. T. (2009). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, 5th Ed. (pp. 941–982). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  25. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fox, M., Gibbs, M., & Auerbach, D. (1985). Age and gender dimensions of friendship. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 489–502. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1985.tb00898.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Frieze, I. H., Sales, E., & Smith, C. (1991). Considering the social context in gender research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 371–392. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00414.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gabriel, S., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there “his” and “hers” types of interdependence? The Implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 642–655. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.642.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Guimond, S., Chatard, A., Martinot, D., Crisp, R. J., & Redersdorff, S. (2006). Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 221–242. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.221.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Halatsis, P., & Christakis, N. (2009). The challenge of sexual attraction within heterosexuals’ cross-sex friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 919–937. doi:10.1177/0265407509345650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hall, J. A. (2011). Sex differences in friendship expectations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. doi:10.1177/0265407510386192.

  34. Hays, R. B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 909–924. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.909.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Henningsen, D. D., Henningsen, M. L. M., & Valde, K. S. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions of women’s sexual interest during cross-sex interactions: An application and extension of cognitive valence theory. Sex Roles, 54, 821–829. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9050-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hughes, R. (1998). Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behaviour. Sociology of Health & Illness, 20, 381–400. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.00107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hughes, M., Morrison, K., & Asada, K. J. K. (2005). What’s love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 49–66. doi:10.1080/10570310500034154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kenler, K. S., Myers, J., & Prescott, C. A. (2005). Sex differences in the relationship between social support and risk for major depression: A Longitudinal study of opposite-sex pairs. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 250–256. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kimmel, M. S. (1994). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame and silence in the construction of gender identity. In H. Broad & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 119–141). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kito, M. (2005). Self-disclosure in romantic relationships and friendships among American and Japanese college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 127–140. doi:10.3200/SOCP.145.2.127-140.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Koenig, B. L., Kirkpatrick, L. E., & Ketelaar, T. (2007). Misperception of sexual and romantic interests in opposite-sex friendships: Four hypotheses. Personal Relationships, 14, 411–429. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00163.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lenton, A. P., & Webber, L. (2006). Cross-sex friendships: Who has more? Sex Roles, 54, 809–820. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9048-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lewis, R. A. (1978). Emotional intimacy among men. Journal of Social Issues, 34, 108–121. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1978.tb02543.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Messner, M. A. (2000). Barbie girls versus sea monsters: Children constructing gender. Gender and Society, 14, 765–784. doi:10.1177/089124300014006004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Monsour, M. (1992). Meanings of intimacy in cross-and same-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 277–295. doi:10.1177/0265407592092007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Monsour, M. (2002). Women and men as friends: Relationships across the life span in the 21st century. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Muraco, A. (2005). Heterosexual evaluations of hypothetical friendship behavior based on sex and sexual orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 587–605. doi:10.1177/0265407505054525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. O’Meara, J. D. (1989). Cross-sex friendship: Four basic challenges of an ignored relationship. Sex Roles, 21, 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF00289102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Reeder, H. M. (2003). The Effect of gender role orientation on same- and cross-sex friendship formation. Sex Roles, 49, 2003. doi:10.1023/A:1024408913880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Reis, H. T. (1998). Gender differences in intimacy and related behaviors: Context and process. In D. L. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 203–231). Mahway: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ridgeway, C. L. (2009). Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender and Society, 23, 145. doi:10.1177/0891243208330313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender and Society, 18, 510–531. doi:10.1177/0891243204265269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rubin, L. B. (1985). Just friends: The role of friendship in our lives. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sheets, V. L., & Lugar, R. (2005). Friendship and gender in Russia and the United States. Sex Roles, 51, 131–140. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1200-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463–481. doi:10.1177/0265407502019004048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Thorne, B. (1986). Girls and boys together… but mostly apart: Gender arrangements in elementary schools. In W. Hartup & Z. Rubin (Eds.), Relationships and development (pp. 167–184). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Walker, K. (1994). Men, women, and friendship: What they say, what they do. Gender and Society, 8, 246–265. doi:10.1177/089124394008002007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Werking, K. (1997). We’re just good friends: Women and men in nonromantic relationships. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  60. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. West, L., Anderson, J., & Duck, S. (1996). Crossing the barriers to friendships between men and women. In J. Wood (Ed.), Gendered relationships (pp. 111–127). Mountain View: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wright, P. H. (1982). Men’s friendships, women’s friendships and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8, 1–20. doi:10.1007/BF00287670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane Felmlee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Felmlee, D., Sweet, E. & Sinclair, H.C. Gender Rules: Same- and Cross-Gender Friendships Norms. Sex Roles 66, 518–529 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0109-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Friendship
  • Gender differences
  • Cross-gender friendship
  • Norms
  • Friendship expectations