Skip to main content

Clothes Make a Difference: The Role of Self-Objectification

Abstract

Objectification Theory contends that women self-objectify as a result of internalizing an observer’s perspective on their physical selves. Self-objectification has been examined as both a stable enduring trait and as a context dependent state. The present study aimed to assess the link between clothing, a neglected area of women’s appearance management, and self-objectification. Participants were 102 South Australian female undergraduate students who completed a questionnaire containing a trait measure of self-objectification, as well as four different scenarios varying in clothing worn and setting depicted, followed by state measures of self-objectification, negative mood, body shame, and body dissatisfaction. It was found that the scenarios involving revealing clothing (bathers) led to greater state self-objectification, body shame, body dissatisfaction and negative mood than the scenarios involving more modest clothing (sweater), especially for heavier women. In addition, the dressing room scenarios led to greater state self-objectification but less negative mood than the public scenarios. It was concluded that clothing represents an important contributor to the body and emotional experience of contemporary young women.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Bell, B. T., Lawton, R., & Dittmar, H. (2007). The impact of thin models in music videos on adolescent girls’ body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 4, 137–145. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.02.003.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Breines, J. G., Crocker, J., & Garcia, J. A. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being in women’s daily lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 583–598. doi:10.1177/0146167207313727.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Calogero, R. M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: The effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16–21. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00118.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cash, T. F., & Pruzinsky, T. (Eds.). (1990). Body images: Development, deviance and change. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T. A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.269.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frith, H., & Gleeson, K. (2004). Clothing and embodiment: Men managing body image and appearance. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5, 40–48. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.5.1.40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garrow, J. S., & Webster, B. S. (1985). Quetelet’s Index (W/H2) as a measure of fatness. International Journal of Obesity, 9, 147-153.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harper, B. J., & Tiggemann, M. (2008). The effect of thin ideal media images on women’s self-obectification, mood, and body image. Sex Roles, 58, 649–657. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9379-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heinberg, L. J., & Thompson, J. K. (1995). Body image and televised images of thinness and attractiveness: A controlled laboratory investigation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 1–14. doi:10.1521/jscp.1995.14.4.325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwon, Y. H., & Parham, E. S. (1994). Effects of state of fatness perception on weight conscious women’s clothing practices. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12, 16–21. doi:10.1177/0887302X9401200403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martins, Y., Tiggemann, M., & Kirkbride, A. (2007). Those Speedos become them: The role of self-objectification in gay and heterosexual men’s body image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 634–647. doi:10.1177/0146167206297403.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McKinley, N. M. (1998). Gender differences in undergraduates’ body esteem: The mediating role of objectified body consciousness and actual/ideal weight discrepancy. Sex Roles, 39, 113–123. doi:10.1023/A:1018834001203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matteson, A. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Prichard, I., & Tiggemann, M. (2005). Objectification in fitness centres: Self-objectification, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating in aerobic instructors and aerobic participants. Sex Roles, 53, 19–28. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-4270-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts, T. A., & Gettman, J. Y. (2004). Mere exposure: Gender differences in the negative effects of priming a state of self-objectification. Sex Roles, 51, 17–27. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000032306.20462.22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rudd, N. A., & Lennon, S. J. (2000). Body image and appearance-management behaviors in college women. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18, 152–162. doi:10.1177/0887302X0001800304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruscher, J.B. (2009). Repeated measures multiple regression. Retrieved from http://www.tulane.edu/~PsycStat/ruscher/Psyc611/Psyc611.htm

  21. Shafran, R., Lee, M., Payne, E., & Fairburn, C. G. (2007). An experimental analysis of body checking. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 113–121. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.01.015.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2010). “Uncool to do sport”: A focus group study of adolescent girls’ reasons for withdrawing from physical activity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 619–626. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.07.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smeets, E., Tiggemann, M., Kemps, E., Mills, J., Hollitt, S., Roefs, A., et al. (2011). Body checking induces an attentional bias for body-related cues. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 44, 50–57. doi:10.1002/eat.20776.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Swami, V., Frederick, D. A., Aavik, T., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., Anderson, D., et al. (2010). The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: Results of the International Body Project I. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 309–325. doi:10.1177/0146167209359702.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins.

  26. Tiggemann, M. (2001). Person x situation interactions in body dissatisfaction. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29, 65–70. doi:10.1002/1098-108X(200101)29:1<65::AID-EAT10>3.0.CO;2-Y.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–64. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tiggemann, M., & Kuring, J. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311. doi:10.1348/0144665031752925.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tiggemann, M., & Boundy, M. (2008). Effect of environment and appearance compliment on college women’s self-objectification, mood, body shame, and cognitive performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 399–405. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00453.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tiggemann, M., & Lacey, C. (2009). Shopping for clothes: Body satisfaction, appearance investment and clothing selection in female shoppers. Body Image, 6, 285–291. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.07.002.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tylka, T. L., & Hill, S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730. doi:10.1007/s11199-004-0721-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marika Tiggemann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tiggemann, M., Andrew, R. Clothes Make a Difference: The Role of Self-Objectification. Sex Roles 66, 646–654 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0085-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Self-objectification
  • Clothing
  • Objectification theory
  • Body shame
  • Body dissatisfaction