Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tampering with Tradition: Rationales Concerning Women’s Married Names and Children’s Surnames

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite advances in gender equality in recent decades, the majority of women continue to change their names upon marriage and parents overwhelmingly opt to give children the father’s surname. In two correlational studies, both involving undergraduate samples from Toronto, Canada, we examined gender differences in naming preferences and in justifications underlying a traditional name choice. Men were more likely to prefer traditional choices in both women’s married names (Study 1; N = 68) and children’s surnames (Study 2; N = 63), and were also more likely to endorse most potential rationales for these choices. Traditional choices were associated with such factors as concern regarding family dynamics, whereas nontraditional choices were associated with such factors as a desire to increase gender equality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almack, K. (2005). What’s in a name? The significance of the choice of surnames given to children born within lesbian-parent families. Sexualities, 8, 239–254. doi:10.1177/1363460705050857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair-Loy, M. (2003). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolzendahl, C. I., & Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Special Forces, 83, 759–790. doi:10.1353/sof.2005.0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxer, D., & Gritsenko, E. (2005). Women and surnames across cultures: Reconstituting identity in marriage. Women and Language, 28, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, J. E. (2006). Organizational responses to the fatherhood crisis: The case of father’s rights groups in the United States. Marriage and Family Review, 39, 99–120. doi:10.1300/J002v39n01_06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne, L. (2006). La situation démographique au Québec, Bilan 2006. Retrieved from http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/publications/demograp/pdf2006/Bilan2006c8.pdf

  • Eibach, R. P., & Ehrlinger, J. (2010). Reference points in men’s and women’s judgments of progress toward gender equality. Sex Roles, 63, 882–893. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9846-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, K. A., & Edson, B. A. (1989). What in a name? Accounts of married women’s name choices. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 356–373. doi:10.1080/10570318909374315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatrell, C. (2007). Whose child is it anyway? The negotiation of paternal entitlements within marriage. The Sociological Review, 352–372. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00709.x

  • Goldin, C., & Shim, M. (2004). Making a name: Women’s surnames at marriage and beyond. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 143–160. doi:10.1257/0895330041371268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, S. (2007, 20 September). Get hitched—but keep your name. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/

  • Hampson, S. (2007, 27 September). Give your children mom’s last name? don’t mess with tradition. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/

  • Hirczy de Mino, W. P. (2000). From bastardly to equality: The rights of nonmarital children and their fathers in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 31, 231–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffnung, M. (2006). What’s in a name? Marital name choice revisited. Sex Roles, 55, 817–825. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9133-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoorens, V., Nuttin, J. M., Erdelyi Herman, I., & Pavakanun, U. (1990). Mastery pleasure versus mere ownership: A quasi-experimental cross-cultural and cross-alphabetical test for the name letter effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 181–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. R., & Scheuble, L. K. (1995). Women’s marital naming in two generations: A national study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 724–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. R., & Scheuble, L. (2002). What should we call our kids? choosing children’s surnames when parents’ last names differ. The Social Science Journal, 39, 419–429. doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(02)00203-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Mirenberg, M. C., & Hetts, J. J. (2002). Name letter preferences are not merely mere exposure: Implicit egotism as self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 170–177. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman, R. E., Shea-Van Fossen, R. J., Paraskevas, E., Lawter, L., & Prottas, D. J. (2009). The bride is keeping her name: A 35-year retrospective analysis of trends and correlates. Social Behavior and Personality, 37, 687–700. doi:10.2224/sbp.2009.37.5.687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krizan, Z., & Suls, J. (2008). Are implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem related? a meta- analysis for the name-letter test. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 521–531. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall, P. R. (1985). The right of women to name their children. Law and Inequality, 3, 91–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noack, T., & Wiik, K. (2008). Women’s choice of surname upon marriage in Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 507–518. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00497.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, C. (2010). Children’s surnames, moral dilemmas: Accounting for the predominance of father’s surnames for children. Gender and Society, 24, 499–525. doi:10.1177/0891243210376380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttin, J. M. (1985). Narcissism beyond gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 353–361. doi:10.100/ejsp.240150309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, G. (2007). Global welfare state convergence? Family policy and health care in Sweden, Canada, and the United States. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 34, 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, B. W., Mirenberg, M. C., & Jones, J. T. (2002). Why Susie sells seashells by the seashore: Implicit egotism and major life decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 469–487. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, D. (1996). Life without father: Compelling new evidence that fatherhood and marriage are indispensable for the good of children and society. New York: Martin Kessler Books–The Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuble, L., & Johnson, D. R. (1993). Marital name change: Plans and attitudes of college students. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 747–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P. (2007). Opting out? why women really quit careers and head home. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (1997). “Mrs. his name”: Women’s preferences for married names. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 417–429. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00122.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Penelope Lockwood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lockwood, P., Burton, C. & Boersma, K. Tampering with Tradition: Rationales Concerning Women’s Married Names and Children’s Surnames. Sex Roles 65, 827–839 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0034-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0034-1

Keywords

Navigation