Sex Roles

, Volume 65, Issue 5–6, pp 421–434 | Cite as

Experienced and Expected Similarity to Same-Gender Peers: Moving Toward a Comprehensive Model of Gender Segregation

  • Carol Lynn MartinEmail author
  • Richard A. Fabes
  • Laura Hanish
  • Stacie Leonard
  • Lisa M. Dinella
Original Article


Gender segregation is often explained by children being interested in interacting with other children who behave similarly to themselves. Children’s beliefs about girls and boys (i.e., their gender cognitions) may also play a role in gender segregation, but this idea has received little attention. In this study, we proposed a model of gender segregation that included similarity on gender-typed behavioral qualities (e.g., rough and tumble play) and gender cognitions concerning perceived similarity to same-gender others, and we assessed whether this more comprehensive heuristic model predicted observed peer interactions in young U.S. children (n = 74; M age = 51 m; middle-class families). A multi-method design was employed including observations of behavior and child reports of gender cognitions. Support was found for the linkages proposed in this comprehensive model for boys; partial support was found for girls. Specifically, the inclusion of gender cognitions was supported for both genders: gender cognitions about perceived similarity related to interactional partner choices for both girls and boys, and accounted for variance in observed partner choices even after behavioral similarity was included in the model. The traditional link concerning behavioral similarity on rough-and-tumble play predicted boys’ but not girls’ interactions. The findings extend knowledge about the role of social cognitions in social behavior, and are consistent with ideas proposed by gender schema theory and other constructivist theories.


Gender cognition Gender-segregation Peers Gender schemas 


  1. Alexander, G. M., & Hines, M. (1994). Gender labels and play styles: Their relative contribution to children’s selection of playmates. Child Development, 65, 869–879. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00789.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbu, S., Le-Maner-Idrissi, G., & Jouanjean, A. (2000). The emergence of gender segregation: Towards an integrative perspective. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain, and Cognition, 3, 7–18.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bem, D. J. (1996). Exotic becomes erotic: A developmental theory of sexual orientation. Psychological Review, 103, 320–335. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2006). A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 34, pp. 39–89). San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  6. Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2007). Developmental intergroup theory: Explaining and reducing children’s social stereotyping and prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 162–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradbard, M. R., & Endsley, R. C. (1983). The effects of sex-typed labeling on preschool children’s information-seeking and retention. Sex Roles, 9, 247–260. doi: 10.1007/BF00289627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradbard, M. R., Martin, C. L., Endsley, R. C., & Halverson, C. F. (1986). Influence of sex stereotypes on children’s exploration and memory: A competence versus performance distinction. Developmental Psychology, 22, 481–486. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.22.4.481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bukowski, W. H., Gauze, C., Hoza, B., & Newcomb, A. F. (1993). Differences and consistency between same-sex and other-sex peer relationships during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 29, 255–263. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.29.2.255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, A., & Shirley, L. (2002). Sex-typed preferences in three domains: Do two-year-olds need cognitive variables? British Journal of Psychology, 93, 203–217. doi: 10.1348/000712602162544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies, D. R. (1986). Children’s performance as a function of sex-typed labels. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 173–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies, D. R. (1989). The effects of gender-typed labels on children’s performance. Current Psychology: Research & Reviews, 8, 267–272. doi: 10.1007/BF02686725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., & Griesler, P. C. (1994). Peer adaptions in the development of antisocial behavior: A confluence model. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp. 61–95). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  14. Eaton, W. O., & Enns, L. R. (1986). Sex differences in human motor activity level. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 19–28. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 451–463. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ennett, S. T., & Bauman, K. E. (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: The case of adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 653–663. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.653.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Espelange, D. L., Holt, M. K., & Henkel, R. R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 205–220. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fabes, R. A. (1994). Physiological, emotional, and behavioral correlates of gender segregation. In C. Leaper (Ed.), Childhood gender segregation: Causes and consequences. New directions for child development (Vol. 65, pp. 19–34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. doi: 10.1002/cd.23219946504.Google Scholar
  19. Fabes, R. A., Martin, C. L., & Hanish, L. D. (2003). Young children’s play qualities in same-, other-, and mixed-sex peer groups. Child Development, 74, 921–932. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freedman, D. G. (1980). Sexual dimorphism and the status hierarchy. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Strayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.), Dominance relations (pp. 261–271). New York: Garland S. T. P. M. Press.Google Scholar
  21. Geary, D. C. (1999). Evolution and developmental sex differences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 115–120. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gelman, S. A., Taylor, M. G. Nguyen, S. P., Leaper, C., & Bigler, R. S. (2004). Mother-child conversations about gender: Understanding the acquisition of essentialist beliefs. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69(1). doi: 10.1111/j.0037-976X.2004.00276.x
  23. Hanish, L. D., Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., Leonard, S., & Herzog, M. (2005). Exposure to externalizing peers in early childhood: Homophily and peer contagion processes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 267–281. doi: 10.1007/s10802-005-3564-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? Psychological Review, 102, 458–489. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.102.3.458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoffman, M. L., & Powlishta, K. K. (2001). Gender segregation in childhood: A test of the interaction style theory. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 298–313. doi: 10.1080/00221320109597485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Howes, C. (1988). Same- and cross-sex friends: Implications for interaction and social skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 3, 21–37. doi: 10.1016/0885-2006(88)90027-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. The American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436. doi: 10.1086/226792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leaper, C. (1994). Exploring the consequences of gender segregation on social relationships. In C. Leaper (Ed.), Childhood gender segregation: causes and consequences (pp. 67–86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. doi: 10.1002/cd.23219946507.Google Scholar
  29. Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation. In W. Overton (Ed.), Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development (Vol. 67, pp. 22–39). Boston: Blackwell. doi: 10.1111/1540-5834.t01-1-00190.Google Scholar
  30. Liben, L. S., & Signorella, M. L. (1987). Children’s gender schemata vol. 38. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.45.4.513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maccoby, E. E. (1994). Commentary: gender segregation in childhood. In C. Leaper (Ed.), Childhood gender segregation: causes and consequences (Vol. 65, pp. 87–97). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  34. Maccoby, E. E. (2000). Perspectives on gender development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 398–406. doi: 10.1080/016502500750037946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1987). Gender segregation in childhood. In W. R. Hayne (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 239–287). Orlando: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin, C. L. (1989). Children's use of gender-related information in making social judgments. Developmental Psychology, 25(1), 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin, C. L. (2000). Cognitive theories of gender development. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 91–121). New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37, 431–446. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.37.3.431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1134. doi: 10.2307/1129498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. (1983). The effects of sex-typing schemas on young children’s memory. Child Development, 54, 563–574. doi: 10.2307/1130043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. (1987). The roles of cognition in sex role acquisition. In D. B. Carter (Ed.), Current conceptions of sex roles and sex typing: Theory and research (pp. 123–137). NY: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Martin, C. L., Eisenbud, L., & Rose, H. (1995). Children’s gender-based reasoning about toys. Child Development, 66, 1453–1471. doi: 10.2307/1131657.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., Evans, S. M., & Wyman, H. (1999). Social cognition on the playground: Children’s beliefs about playing with girls versus boys and their relations to sex segregated play. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 751–771. doi: 10.1177/0265407599166005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkrybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive theories of early gender development. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 903–933. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.128.6.903.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martin, C. L., Kornienko, O., Schaefer, D. R. Hanish, L., Fabes, R. A., & Goble, P. (2010). The role of sex of peers and gender-typed activities in young children’s peer affiliative networks: A longitudinal analysis of selection and influence. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  46. Mehta, C. M., & Strough, J. (2009). Sex segregation in friendships and normative contexts across the life span. Developmental Review, 29, 201–220. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2009.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller, C. F., Ruble, D. N., & Traunter, H. M. (2004). The role of gender stereotypes in children’s preferences and behavior. In C. Tamis-LeMonda & L. Balter (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  48. Pellegrini, A. D. (1987). Rough-and-tumble play: Developmental and educational significance. Educational Psychologist, 22, 23–43. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2201_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Powlishta, K. K. (1995). Intergroup processes in childhood: Social categorization and sex-role development. Developmental Psychology, 31, 781–788. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.31.5.781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Powlishta, K. K., Serbin, L. A., & Moller, L. C. (1993). The stability of individual differences in gender typing: Implications for understanding gender segregation. Sex Roles, 29, 723–737. doi: 10.1007/BF00289214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rubin, K. H., Lynch, D., Coplan, R., Rose-Krasnor, L., & Booth, C. L. (1994). “Birds of a feather…”: Behavioral concordances and preferential personal attraction in children. Child Development, 65, 1778–1785. doi: 10.2307/1131293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2006). Gender development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child development (pp. 858–932). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Schaefer, D. R., Light, J. M., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., & Martin, C. L. (2010). Fundamental principles of network formation among preschool children. Social Networks, 32, 61–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Serbin, L. A., Moller, L. C., Gulko, J., Powlishta, K. K., & Colburne, K. A. (1994). The emergence of gender segregation in toddler playgroups. In: C. Leaper (Ed.), Childhood gender segregation: Causes and consequences. New directions for child development, No. 65. (pp. 7–17). SF: Jossey-Bass. doi: 10.1002/cd.23219946503
  55. Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Franworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers’ beliefs and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interaction theory. Criminology, 32, 47–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01146.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Waldrop, M. F., & Halverson, C. (1975). Intensive and extensive peer behavior: Longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses. Child Development, 46, 19–26. doi: 10.2307/1128829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Winer, B. J. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York City: McGraw-Hill. doi: 10.1037/11774-001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zosuls, K. M., Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., Miller, C. F., Gaertner, B. M., England, D. E., & Hill, A. P. (2011). “It’s not that we hate you”: Understanding children’s attitudes and expectancies about peer relationships. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 29, 288304. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2010.02023.x

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol Lynn Martin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Richard A. Fabes
    • 1
  • Laura Hanish
    • 1
  • Stacie Leonard
    • 1
  • Lisa M. Dinella
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Social and Family DynamicsArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentMonmouth UniversityWest Long BranchUSA

Personalised recommendations