Abstract
This study examined the effect of gender socialization on kindergarten grades using data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study- Kindergarten Cohort. The sample consisted of 6,394 children (3,177 girls; 3,217 boys) from across the United States. MANOVA and follow-up tests revealed that both boys and girls tend to participate in gender-typed activities. Girls are more likely to have positive school attitudes and exhibit positive social behavior; boys are more likely to have negative school attitudes. Regression analyses indicated that participation in “female” activities and positive social behavior positively affect grades; participation in “male” activities has no direct effect. Positive attitudes positively affect the grades of girls; negative attitudes negatively affect the grades of boys. Teacher evaluation practices are also considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, K., Entwisle, D., & Dauber, S. (2003). On the success of failure: A reassessment of the effects of retention in the primary grades (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
American Association of University Women. (1998). Gender gaps: Where schools still fail our children. Washington: Author.
Attewell, P. (2001). The winner-take-all high school: Organizational adaptations to educational stratification. Sociology of Education, 74, 267–295.
Beal, C. (1994). Boys and girls: The development of gender roles. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bishaw, A., & Semega, J. (2008). Income, earnings, and poverty data from the 2007 American Community Survey. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Education reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.
Brophy, J. (1985). Interactions of male and female students with male and female teachers. In L. Wilkinson & C. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 115–142). Orlando: Academic.
Caldera, Y., Huston, A., & O’Brien, M. (1989). Social interactions and play patterns of parents and toddlers with feminine, masculine, and neutral toys. Child Development, 60, 70–76. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.ep7250687.
Caldera, Y., McDonald-Culp, A., O’Brien, M., Alvarez, M., & Huston, A. C. (1999). Children’s play preferences, construction play with blocks, and visual-spatial skills: Are they related? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23, 855–872. doi:10.1080/016502599383577.
Carbonaro, W. (2005). Tracking, students’ effort, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 78, 27–49. doi:10.1177/003804070507800102.
Clark, M. (1990). The great divide: Gender in the primary school. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.
College Board (2008). College-bound seniors 2008: Total group profile report. New York: Author.
Condron, D. J. (2007). Stratification and educational sorting: Explaining ascriptive inequalities in early childhood reading group placement. Social Problems, 54, 139–160. doi:10.1525/sp. 2007.54.1.139.
Connell, R. W. (1989). Cool guys, swots, and wimps: The interplay of masculinity and education. Oxford Review of Education, 15, 291–303. doi:10.1080/0305498890150309.
Corbett, C., Hill, C., & St. Rose, A. (2008). Where the girls are: The facts about gender equity in education. Washington: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
Dauber, S., Alexander, K., & Entwisle, D. (1996). Tracking and transitions through the middle grades: Channeling educational trajectories. Sociology of Education, 69, 290–307.
De Graaf, N., De Graaf, P., & Kraaykamp, G. (2000). Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in the Netherlands: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective. Sociology of Education, 73, 92–111.
DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B., & Smith, J. (2008). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2007. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.
DiMaggio, P., & Useem, M. (1978). Social class and arts consumption: The origins and consequences of class differences in exposure to the arts in America. Theory and Society, 5, 141–159. doi:10.1007/BF01702159.
Downey, D., & Pribesh, S. (2004). When race matters: Teachers’ evaluations of students’ classroom behavior. Sociology of Education, 77, 267–282. doi:10.1177/003804070407700401.
Dumais, S. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus. Sociology of Education, 75, 44–68.
Dunn, J., & Hughes, C. (2001). “I got some swords and you’re dead!”: Violent fantasy, antisocial behavior, friendship, and moral sensibility in young children. Child Development, 72, 491–505. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00292.
Eisenberg, N., Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (1996). Gender development and gender effects. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 358–396). New York: Prentice-Hall International.
Entwisle, D., Alexander, K., & Olson, L. (1994). The gender gap in math: Its possible origins in neighborhood effects. American Sociological Review, 59, 822–838.
Entwisle, D., Alexander, K., & Olson, L. (1997). Children, schools, and inequality. Boulder: Westview Press.
Entwisle, D., Alexander, K., & Olson, L. (2005). First grade and educational attainment by age 22: A new story. The American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1458–1502. doi:10.1086/428444.
Entwisle, D., Alexander, K., & Olson, L. (2006). Educational tracking within and between schools: From first grade through middle school and beyond. In A. Huston & M. Ripke (Eds.), Developmental contexts in middle childhood (pp. 173–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Entwisle, D., Alexander, K., & Olson, L. (2007). Early schooling: The handicap of being poor and male. Sociology of Education, 80, 114–138. doi:10.1177/003804070708000202.
Fagot, B., & Leinbach, M. (1983). Play styles in early childhood: Social consequences for boys and girls. In M. Liss (Ed.), Social and cognitive skills: Sex roles and children’s play (pp. 93–116). New York: Academic.
Faludi, S. (1999). Stiffed: The betrayal of the American man. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
Farkas, G., Sheehan, D., & Grobe, R. (1990). Coursework mastery and school success: Gender, ethnicity, and poverty groups within an urban school district. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 807–827. doi:10.3102/00028312027004807.
Francis, B. (2000). Boys, girls, and achievement: Addressing the classroom issues. London: Routledge/Falmer Press.
Gamoran, A. (1991). Schooling and achievement: Additive versus interactive models. In S. Raudenbush & J. Willms (Eds.), Schools, classrooms, and pupils: International studies of schooling from a multilevel perspective (pp. 37–51). San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.
Gracey, H. ([1975] 2008). Learning the student role: Kindergarten as academic boot camp. In J. Ballantine & J. Spade (Eds.), School and society: A sociological approach to education, (3rd ed., pp. 131–136). Los Angeles, California: Pine Forge Press.
Grusec, J. E., Goodnow, J. J., & Cohen, L. (1996). Household work and the development of concern for others. Developmental Psychology, 32, 999–1007. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.6.999.
Huston, A. C., Wright, J. C., Marquis, J., & Green, S. B. (1999). How young children spend their time: Television and other activities. Developmental Psychology, 35, 921–925. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.912.
Jordan, E., & Cowan, A. (1995). Warrior narratives in the kindergarten classroom: Renegotiating the social contract? Gender and Society, 9, 727–743. doi:10.1177/089124395009006006.
Kelly, S. (2008). What types of students’ efforts are rewarded with high marks? Sociology of Education, 81, 32–52. doi:1177/003804070808100102.
Kimmel, M. (2000). The gendered society (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kivel, P. (2010). The act-like-a-man box. In M. Kimmel & M. Messner (Eds.), Men’s lives (8th ed., pp. 83–85). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Lackey, P. N. (1989). Adults’ attitudes about assignments of household chores to male and female children. Sex Roles, 20, 271–281. doi:10.1007/BF00287724.
Levine, S., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S., Newcombe, N., & Huttenlocher, J. (2005). Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychological Science, 16, 841–845. doi:10.1111/j.1467.9280.2005.0163.x.
Maccoby, E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing apart and coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Martin, C. L., & Dinella, L. M. (2002). Children’s gender cognitions, the social environment, and sex differences in cognitive domains. In A. McGillicuddy-De Lisi & R. De Lisi (Eds.), Biology, society, and behavior: The development of sex differences in cognition (pp. 207–239). Westport: Ablex.
McHale, S. M., Kim, J., Whiteman, S., & Crouter, A. C. (2004). Links between sex-typed time use in middle childhood and gender development in early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 40, 868–881. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.868.
Mickelson, R. (1989). Why does Jane read and write so well? The anomaly of women's achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 47–63.
Mickelson, R. (2003). Gender, Bourdieu, and the anomaly of women’s achievement redux. Sociology of Education, 76, 372–375.
Mickelson, R. (2008). Gender and education. In J. Ballantine & J. Spade (Eds.), Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (3rd ed., pp. 328–338). Newbury Park: Pine Forge.
Miller, C. (1987). Qualitative differences among gender-stereotyped toys: Implications for cognitive and social development in girls and boys. Sex Roles, 16, 473–488. doi:10.1007/BF00292482.
Muller, C. (1998). Gender differences in parental involvement and adolescents’ mathematics achievement. Sociology of Education, 71, 336–356.
National Center for Education Statistics (2006). ECLS-K longitudinal kindergarten-fifth grade public-use data file: data files and electronic codebook. [Washington, D.C.]: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
Paechter, C. (1998). Educating the other: Gender, power, and schooling. London: Falmer Press.
Renzetti, C., & Curran, D. (2003). Women, men, and society (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Rosenbaum, J. (2001). Beyond college for all: Career paths for the forgotten half. New York: Russell Sage.
Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2006). Gender development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 3, social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 858–932). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42, 70–83. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70.
Sommers, C. (2000, May). The war against boys. Atlantic Monthly, 285, 59–74.
Stiggins, R., & Conklin, N. (1992). In teachers’ hands: Investigating the practices of classroom assessment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Census Bureau, U. S. (2009). Statistical abstract of the United States: 2009. Washington: Author.
U.S. Department of Education (National Center for Education Statistics). (2007). America’s high school graduates: Results from the 2005 NAEP High School Transcript Study. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Warrington, M., Younger, M., & Williams, J. (2000). Students’ attitudes, image, and the gender gap. British Educational Research Journal, 26, 393–407. doi:10.1080/01411920050030914.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orr, A.J. Gendered Capital: Childhood Socialization and the “Boy Crisis” in Education. Sex Roles 65, 271–284 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0016-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0016-3