Skip to main content

Gender and the Choice of a Science Career: The Impact of Social Support and Possible Selves

Sex Roles volume 66, pages 197–209 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

This study examined the relationships among perceived social support, beliefs about how one would fare in a science career, and perceptions and choice of a career in science. Participants were 48 men and 33 women from the Midwestern United States who had been identified as gifted in mathematics and science and participated in a high school science enrichment program. They ranged in age from 24 to 28 years old, and the sample was predominantly White (83.3%). Participants completed an online measure approximately 10 years after the program ended examining their sources of support and beliefs about the self as a scientist to see how these variables influence perceptions of a science career and actual career. We expected that the relationship between perceived support from people and current job held would be mediated by participants’ beliefs about their personal life as a scientist in the future. Similarly, we expected that the relationship between a perceived supportive environment and having a science career would be mediated by participants’ beliefs about their career as a scientist in the future. Findings indicated that social support contributed directly to men’s and women’s ability to envision themselves in a future science career, which, in turn, predicted their interest in and motivation for a science career. No significant gender differences were found in the predictors of men’s and women’s perceptions and choice of a science career. Implications for recruitment of students into scientific majors and careers are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bombardieri, M. (2005, January 17). Summers’ remarks on women draw fire. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/01/17/summers_remarks_on_women_draw_fire/

  • Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1997). A longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. Frontiers in Education Conference. 1997. 27th Annual Conference, ‘Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change’. Proceedings, 1, 134–143. doi:10.1109/FIE.1997.644826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. R. (1991). The roots of gender inequity in technical areas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 251–264. doi:10.1002/tea.3660280306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheryan, S., & Plaut, V. C. (2010). Explaining underrepresentation: A theory of precluded interest. Sex Roles, 63, 475–488. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9835-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Studying gender and ethnic differences in participation in math, physical science, and information technology. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2005, 7–14. doi:10.1002/cd.146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 199–210). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Barber, B., & Jozefowicz, D. (1999). Linking gender to educational occupation, and recreational choices: Applying the Eccles et al model of achievement-related choices. In W. B. Swann, J. H. Langlois, & L. A. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 153–192). Washington: APA Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frome, P. M., Alfeld, C. J., Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (2006). Why don’t they want a male-dominated job? An investigation of young women who changed their occupational aspirations. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 359–372. doi:10.1080/13803610600765786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, H., & Hartman, M. (2008). How undergraduate engineering students perceive women’s (and men’s) problems in science, math and engineering. Sex Roles, 58, 251–265. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9327-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostler, S., & Gressard, R. (1993). Appendix 3 C: Gender fairness environment scale [developed by the University of Virginia School of Medicine Committee on Women]. Perceptions of the medical education environment. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 48, 51–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larose, S., Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Senecal, C., Harvey, M., & Drouin, E. (2008). A sociomotivational analysis of gender effects on persistence in science and technology: A 5-year longitudinal study. In H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 171–192). Washington: APA Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lips, H. M. (2004). The gender gap in possible selves: Divergence of academic self-views among high school and university students. Sex Roles, 50, 357–371. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000018891.88889.c9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupart, J. L., Cannon, E., & Telfer, J. A. (2004). Gender differences in adolescent academic achievement, interests, values and life-role expectations. High Ability Studies, 15, 25–42. doi:10.1080/1359813042000225320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madill, H. M., Ciccocioppo, A., Stewin, L. L., Armour, M., & Montgomerie, T. C. (2004). The potential to develop a career in science: Young women’s issues and their implications for careers guidance initiatives. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 26, 1–19. doi:10.1023/B:ADCO.0000021546.17402.5b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahaffy, K. A., & Ward, S. K. (2002). The gendering of adolescents’ childbearing and educational plans: Reciprocal effects and the influence of social context. Sex Roles, 46, 403–417. doi:10.1023/A:1020413630553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954.

  • Messersmith, E. E., Garrett, J. L., Davis-Kean, P. E., Malanchuk, O., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Career development from adolescence through emerging adulthood: Insights from information technology occupations. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 206–227. doi:10.1177/0743558407310723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C., Isaac, J. D., & Sansone, C. (2001). The role of interest in understanding the career choices of female and male college students. Sex Roles, 44, 295–320. doi:10.1023/A:1010929600004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (2006). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ocga/briefings/Women_in_Academic_Sci_and_Engineering.asp

  • Obama, B. (2011, Janurary 25). Transcript: Obama’s state of the union address. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2011/01/26/133224933/transcript-obamas-state-of-union-address

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S., Stokes, J., Raja, S., & Sullivan, M. (1997). Measuring perceptions of the work environment for faculty. The Review of Higher Education, 21, 63–78. doi:10.1353/rhe.1997.0015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Malley, J., & Stewart, A. J. (2006). The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad, and the changeable. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 47–58. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00261.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. M., & Farkas, G. (2008). Sex, class, and physical science educational attainment: Portions due to achievement versus recruitment. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 14, 269–300. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v14.i3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R.D., & Troost, K.M. (1982). Influences on commitment to and learning of science among adolescent students. Science Education, 66, 763–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: A critical review. American Psychologist, 60, 950–958. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E. (2006). The critical mediating role of social encouragement for science motivation and confidence among high school girls and boys. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1017–1045. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00053.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E., & Mares, K. R. (2001). Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: Predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1065–1088. doi:10.1002/tea.10001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E., & Mares, K. R. (2005). Evaluating the impact of science-enrichment programs on adolescents’ science motivation and confidence: The splashdown effect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 359–375. doi:10.1002/tea.20052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E., & Nickens, S. D. (2005). Adolescent girls’ and boys’ science peer relationships and perceptions of the possible self as scientist. Sex Roles, 52, 1–11. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1189-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (2006). R. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/foundation/

  • The White House Office of the Press Secretary (2010, October 18). President Obama to host White House science fair: President will celebrate winners of science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) competitions and announce new steps to inspire all students to excel. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/10/18/president-obama-host-white-house-science-fair

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was conducted as part of Sarah Buday’s master’s thesis under the supervision of Jayne Stake. The authors wish to thank Dr. Ken Mares and Kathy Kirkpatrick for their assistance in collecting data and contacting participants, and Graham Wohler for his assistance with data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, One University Blvd, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA

    Sarah K. Buday, Jayne E. Stake & Zoë D. Peterson

Authors
  1. Sarah K. Buday
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jayne E. Stake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zoë D. Peterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah K. Buday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buday, S.K., Stake, J.E. & Peterson, Z.D. Gender and the Choice of a Science Career: The Impact of Social Support and Possible Selves. Sex Roles 66, 197–209 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0015-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0015-4

Keywords

  • Science careers
  • Sex differences
  • Gender
  • Social support
  • Possible selves
  • Self-confidence