Advertisement

Sex Roles

, 65:548 | Cite as

Masculinity and the Distortion of Self-Reported Height in Men

  • Anthony F. Bogaert
  • Donald R. McCreary
Original Article

Abstract

In this study, we examined whether aspects of the masculine gender role predict the distortion of self-reported height in men. The sample of men (N = 220) were from a mid-sized university in Ontario, Canada and ranged in age from 17.92 through 29.25 years. The men reported their height and completed scales measuring masculine, gender-related characteristics (Agency, Unmitigated Agency, gender-typed Occupational Preferences and Conformity to Male Norms). An experimenter also measured the men’s height using a standardized scale. As expected, the men over-reported their height. Shorter men exaggerated their height more than taller men. Also, as expected, a linear regression analysis revealed that certain masculine, gender-related characteristics (Unmitigated Agency and Occupational Preferences) predicted an over-reporting of height. These results suggest that men higher in some stereotypically masculine gender role characteristics have an elevated need to achieve socially desirable masculine physical characteristics, and do so to such a degree that they are prone to distorting this important aspect of their body size. Implications of these results (e.g., the reliability of self-report height) are discussed.

Keywords

Height Height overestimation Masculinity Gender roles 

References

  1. Alexander, M. G., & Fisher, T. D. (2003). Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 27–35. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, J. M., & Zucker, K. J. (1995). Childhood sex-typed behavior and sexual orientation. Developmental Psychology, 31, 43–55. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.1.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  4. Bergeron, D., & Tylka, T. L. (2007). Support for the uniqueness of body dissatisfaction from drive for muscularity among men. Body Image, 4, 288–295. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.05.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 157–215). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blashill, A. J., & van der Wal, J. S. (2009). Mediation of gender role conflict and eating pathology in gay men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 10, 204–217. doi: 10.1037/a0016000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogaert, A. F. (2010). Physical development and sexual orientation in men and women: An examination of NATSAL-2000. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 110–116. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9398-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bogaert, A. F., & Blanchard, R. (1996). Physical development and sexual orientation in men: Height, weight, and age of puberty differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 77–84. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00045-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brannon, R., & Juni, S. (1984). A scale for measuring attitudes toward masculinity. Psychological Documents, 14, 6.Google Scholar
  10. Cameron, C., Oskamp, S., & Sparks, W. (1978). Courtship American style: Newspaper advertisements. Family Coordinator, 26, 27–30. doi: 10.2307/581857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danoff-Burg, S., Mosher, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (2006). Relations of agentic and communal personality traits to health behavior and substance use among college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 353–363. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fawcett, C. A. (2006). Individual difference factors and men’s attraction to female body features (Unpublished master's thesis). Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  13. Feldman, S. D. (1975). The presentation of shortness in everyday life—height and heightism in American society: Toward a sociology of stature. In S. D. Feldman & G. W. Thielbar (Eds.), Life styles: Diversity in American society (pp. 427–442). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  14. Ghaed, S. G., & Gallo, L. C. (2006). Distinctions among agency, communion, and unmitigated agency and communion according to the interpersonal circumplex, five-factor model, and social-emotional correlates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 77–88. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_09.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1998). A theory of unmitigated communion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 173–183. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (2000). The implications of unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion for domains of problem behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 1031–1057. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helgeson, V. S., & Lepore, S. J. (2004). Quality of life following prostate cancer: The role of agency and unmitigated agency. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2559–2585.Google Scholar
  19. Herpin, N. (2005). Love, careers, and heights in France, 2001. Economics and Human Biology, 3, 420–449. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2005.04.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, H. D., Lamont, J., Monacelli, J., & Vojick, A. (2004). Sex-role orientation associations with college students’ body-image preferences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 99, 995–998. doi: 10.2466/PMS.99.7.995-998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lever, J., Frederick, D. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2006). Does size matter? Men and women’s view on penis size across the lifespan. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 7, 129–143. doi: 10.1037/1524-9220.7.3.129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lippa, R. A. (1995). Gender-related individual differences and psychological adjustment in terms of the Big Five and circumplex models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1184–1202. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lippa, R. A. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996–1009. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lippa, R. A. (2002). Gender-related traits of heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 83–98. doi: 10.1023/A:1014035302843.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lippa, R. A. (2005a). Subdomains of gender-related occupational interests: Do they form a cohesive bipolar M-F dimension? Journal of Personality, 73, 693–730. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00326.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lippa, R. A. (2005b). Gender, nature, and nurture (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Lippa, R. A. (2006). The gender reality hypothesis. The American Psychologist, 61, 639–640. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lippa, R. A. (2008a). Sex differences and sexual orientation differences in personality: Findings from the BBC internet survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 173–187. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9267-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lippa, R. A. (2008b). The relation between childhood gender nonconformity and adult masculinity-femininity and anxiety in heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Sex Roles, 59, 684–693. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9476-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B., Ludlow, L., Diemer, M., Scott, R., Gottfried, M., et al. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 3–25. doi: 10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin, J. T., & Nguyen, D. H. (2004). Anthropometric analysis of homosexuals and heterosexuals: Implications for early hormone exposure. Hormones and Behavior, 45, 31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2003.07.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martins, Y., Tiggemann, M., & Churchett, L. (2008). The shape of things to come: Gay men’s satisfaction with specific body parts. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 9, 248–256. doi: 10.1037/a0012473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCreary, D. R., Saucier, D. M., & Courtenay, W. H. (2005). The drive for muscularity and masculinity: Testing the associations among gender role traits, behaviors, attitudes, and conflict. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 83–94. doi: 10.1037/1524-9220.6.2.83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nettle, D. (2002). Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Human Nature, 13, 473–491. doi: 10.1007/s12110-002-1004-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nieto-Garcia, F. J., Bush, T. L., & Keyl, P. M. (1990). Body mass definitions of obesity: Sensitivity and specificity using self-reported weight and height. Epidemiology, 1, 146–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Palta, M., Prineas, R. J., Berman, R., & Hannan, P. (1982). Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight. American Journal of Epidemiology, 115, 223–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. I., & Lipowicz, A. (2000). Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature, 403, 156. doi: 10.1038/35003107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Phillips, K. A., Menard, W., & Fay, C. (2006). Gender similarities and differences in 200 individuals with body dysmorphic disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 47, 77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2005.07.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pirie, P., Jacobs, D., Jeffery, R., & Hannan, P. (1981). Distortion in self-reported height and weight data. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 78, 601–606.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pozzebon, J. A., Visser, B. A., & Bogaert, A. F. (2011). What makes you think you’re so sexy, tall, and thin? The prediction of self-rated attractiveness, height, and weight. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. Google Scholar
  41. Ridgeway, R. T., & Tylka, T. L. (2005). College men’s perceptions of ideal body shape. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 209–220. doi: 10.1037/1524-9220.6.3.209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rieger, G., Linsenmeier, J. A. W., Gygax, L., & Bailey, J. M. (2008). Sexual orientation and childhood gender nonconformity: Evidence from home videos. Developmental Psychology, 44, 46–58. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sear, R., & Marlowe, F. W. (2009). How universal are human mate choices? Size does not matter when Hadza foragers are choosing a mate. Biology Letters, 5, 606–609. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shepperd, J. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1989). Attractiveness and height: The role of stature in dating preference, frequency of dating, and perceptions of attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 617–627. doi: 10.1177/0146167289154014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smiler, A. P., & Epstein, M. (2010). Issues in the measurement of gender. In J. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology: Vol 1. Gender research in general and experimental psychology (pp. 153–158). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1673.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spencer, E. A., Appleby, P. N., Davey, G. K., & Key, T. J. (2002). Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC–Oxford participants. Public Health Nutrition, 5, 561–565. doi: 10.1079/PHN2001322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stewart, A. L. (1982). The reliability and validity of self-reported weight and height. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 35, 295–309. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(82)90085-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thompson, E. H., Jr., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. The American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543. doi: 10.1177/000276486029005003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325. doi: 10.1007/BF02766650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tylka, T. L., Bergeron, D., & Schwartz, J. P. (2005). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Male Body Attitudes Scale (MBAS). Body Image, 2, 161–175. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.03.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Watkins, C. D., Fraccaro, P. J., Smith, F. G., Vukovic, J., Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., et al. (2010). Taller men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 943–947. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arq091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada
  2. 2.Department of Community Health SciencesBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations