This study compares educational, career, and family outcomes by gender composition of college and race/ethnicity of women who graduated in 1993 from three selective U.S. colleges (two single-sex; one coed). It also compares these graduates’ assessments of their college experience. The 60 White women and 60 Women of Color were interviewed as traditional-age seniors and surveyed annually for 16 years. In 2009, 76.7% responded. All groups were happy with their alma maters, although they assessed the advantages and disadvantages somewhat differently. Single-sex graduates more frequently indicated that their college had provided a supportive environment and complained that it provided a limited social life. Coed graduates more frequently indicated that their college provided cultural broadening and positive social relationships. Coed White graduates were in touch with more college friends than single-sex White graduates; there was no significant difference by type of college for Women of Color graduates. Results indicate no significant differences in advanced degrees or career status or STEM field involvement by gender composition of college or race/ethnicity. Nor were any differences in marriage or motherhood variables found. The similarity in outcomes supports the primacy of status of college and is interpreted as positive indication that U.S. colleges have become more hospitable to women.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Astin, A. (1977). Four critical years. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss.
Belliveau, M. A. (2005). Blind ambition? The effect of social networks and institutional sex composition on the job search outcomes of elite coeducational and women’s college graduates. Organization Science, 16, 134–150.
Betz, N. (1993). Women’s career development. In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (pp. 625–684). Westport: Greenwood.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2008). Current Population Survey (CPS). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.pdf.
Calefati, J. (2009, March 11). The changing face of women’s colleges: An all-female cadet corps and support for students who are mothers show women’s colleges’ new appeal. U.S. News and World Report. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/articles/2009/03/11/list-of-womens-colleges.html.
Carr, B. P. (2007–2008). Can separate be equal? Single-sex classrooms, the constitution, and Title IX. Notre Dame Law Review, 83, 409–442.
Crawford, M., & MacLeod, M. (1990). Gender in the college classroom: An assessment of the “chilly climate” for women. Sex Roles, 23, 101–122.
Crosby, F., Allen, B., Culbertson, T., Wally, C., Morith, J., Hall, R., et al. (1994). Taking selectivity into account, how much does gender composition matter? A reanalysis of M.E. Tidball’s research. NWSA Journal, 6, 107–118.
Duncan, L. E., Wentworth, P. A., Owen-Smith, A., & LaFavor, T. (2002). Midlife educational, career, and family outcomes of women educated at two single-sex colleges. Sex Roles, 47, 237–247.
Faragher, J. M., & Howe, F. (1988). Women and higher education in American history. New York: W.W. Norton.
Golden, C. (1996). What’s in a name? Sexual self-identification among women. In R. Savin-Williams & K. M. Cohen (Eds.), The lives of lesbians, gays, and bisexuals: Children to adults (pp. 229–249). Orlando: Harcourt Brace.
Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly climate for women? Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.
Harvard University. (2009). Faculty development and diversity. Retrieved from http://www.faculty.harvard.edu/appointment-policies-and-practices/resources-conducting-faculty-search/faculty-recruitment-peer-inst.
Hoffnung, M. (1994, March). Who are our students? Paper presented at the National Conference of the Association for Women in Psychology, Oakland, CA.
Hoffnung, M. (1998, November). Women’s changing attitudes toward work and family: College to five years after. Paper presented at Work and Family Conference, Boston, MA.
Hoffnung, M. (1999). Women’s changing attitudes toward work and family: College to five years after. Women & Work, 1, 27–39.
Hoffnung, M. (2000, March). Motherhood and career: Changes in college women’s thoughts over time. Paper presented as part of Mothers in the Millennium Symposium, at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltimore, MD.
Hoffnung, M. (2001, March). Maintaining participation in feminist longitudinal research: Studying young women’s lives over time. Paper presented as part of the Feminist Research Methods Symposium at the National Conference of the Association for Women in Psychology, Los Angeles, CA.
Hoffnung, M. (2004). Wanting it all: Career, marriage, and motherhood during college-educated women’s 20s. Sex Roles, 50, 711–723.
Hoffnung, M. (2006). What’s in a name? Marital name choice revisited. Sex Roles, 55, 817–825.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1957/1965). Two factor index of social position. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Howe, F. (1984). Myths of coeducation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hughes, J. O., & Sandler, B. R. (1988). Peer harassment: Hassles for women on campus. Washington, D.C.: Project on the Status of Education for Women, Association of American Colleges.
Kinzie, J., Thomas, A. D., Palmer, M. M., Umbach, P. D., & Kuh, G. D. (2007). Women students at coeducational and women’s colleges: How do their experiences compare? Journal of College Student Development, 48, 145–165.
Krupnick, C. G. (1985, May). Women and men in the classroom: Inequality and its remedies. On Teaching and Learning, 18–25.
Leonard, D. (2006). Single-sex schooling. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), The Sage handbook of gender and education (pp. 190–204). London: Sage.
Luebke, B. F., & Reilly, M. E. (1995). Womens’s studies graduates: The first generation. NY: Teachers College Press.
Maher, F. A., & Tetreault, M. K. T. (1994). The feminist classroom. New York: Basic Books.
Miller-Bernal, L. (1993). Single-sex versus coeducational environments: A comparison of women students’ experiences at four colleges. American Journal of Education, 102, 23–54.
National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education. (2008). Title IX at 35: Beyond the headlines. Retrieved from http://www.ncwge.org/pubs-reports.html#ix.
Oates, M. J., & Williamson, S. (1978). Women’s colleges and women achievers. Signs, 3, 795–806.
O’Reilly, E., & Mottet, L. (2000–2001). Single-sex education. Georgetown Journal of Gender and Law, II, 467–476.
Rice, J. K., & Hemmings, A. (1988). Women’s colleges and women achievers. Signs, 13, 546–559.
Riordan, C. (1994). The value of attending a women’s college: Education, occupation, and income benefits. Journal of Higher Education, 6, 486–510.
Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America’s schools cheat girls. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.
Smith, D. G. (1990). Women’s colleges and coed colleges: Is there a difference for women? The Journal of Higher Education, 61, 181–197.
Spence, J. T., & Hahn, E. D. (1997). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 17–34.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 219–220.
Tidball, M. E. (1973). Perspectives on academic women and affirmative action. Educational Record, 54, 130–135.
Tidball, M. E. (1980). Women’ colleges and women achievers revisted. Signs, 5, 504–517.
Tidball, M. E. (1985). Baccalaureate origins of entrants into American Medical Schools. Journal of Higher Education, 56, 385–402.
Tidball, M. E. (1986). Baccalaureate origins of recent natural science doctorates. Journal of Higher Education, 57, 606–620.
Tidball, M. E., & Kistiakowsky, V. (1976). Baccalaureate origins of American scientists and scholars. Science, 193, 646–652.
Wolf-Wendel, L. E. (2002). Women’s colleges. In A. M. Martinez Aleman & K. A. Renn (Eds.), Women in higher education (pp. 61–67). Santa Barbara: ABC Clio.
This longitudinal study was supported by the Faculty Research Committee of Quinnipiac University. Thanks to Melissa Gibbons and Celeste Jorge, for many years of able assistance keeping track of participants, coding, and entering data. Thanks, also, to the participants for sharing their lives.
About this article
Cite this article
Hoffnung, M. Career and Family Outcomes for Women Graduates of Single-Sex Versus Coed Colleges. Sex Roles 65, 680–692 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9914-z