Abstract
This study investigates whether gender-typed behaviors are associated with two aspects of school adjustment—engagement and attachment. The analysis uses a nationally representative sample of middle and high school students in US schools in 1995 (n = 6,349 girls and 5,954 boys). Ordinary least square models show that both boys and girls with extremely gender-typed behaviors report lower levels of school engagement and attachment than gender-typical peers, consistent with previous research that documented adjustment problems linked to hypergender. Among boys but not among girls, gender-atypical students report lower levels of engagement and attachment than gender-typical peers, indicating stigma attached to boys’ feminine behaviors at school. Interpersonal problems with peers and teachers explain large portions of these group differences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auster, C. J., & Ohm, S. C. (2000). Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A reevaluation using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 43, 499–528.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713.
Cahill, S. E. (1986). Language practices and self definition: The case of gender identity acquisition. Sociological Quarterly, 27, 295–311.
Cleveland, H. H., Udry, J. R., & Chantala, K. (2001). Environmental and genetic influences on sex-typed behaviors and attitudes of male and female adolescents. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1587–1598.
Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society. New York: Free Press.
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859.
Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154–165.
Eder, D., Evans, C. C., & Parker, S. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
Herek, G. M. (2002). Gender gaps in public opinion about lesbians and gay men. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 40–66.
Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2001). Students’ attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74, 318–340.
Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Thaden, L. L. (2006). Gendered patterns in adolescents’ school attachment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 284–295.
Kandel, D. B. (1978). Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 306–312.
Kreiger, T. C., & Dumka, L. E. (2006). The relationships between hypergender, gender, and psychological adjustment. Sex Roles, 54, 777–785.
Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 190–206.
Lasane, T. P., Howard, W. L., Czopp, A. M., Sweigard, P. N., Bennett, G. G., & Carvajal, F. (1999). Hypermasculinity and academic goal-setting: An exploratory study. Psychological Reports, 85, 487–496.
Libbey, H. P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. The Journal of School Health, 74, 274–283.
Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and National Merit Test Performance: “Feminine” boys and “masculine” girls tend to do better. In L. Ellis & L. Ebertz (Eds.), Males, females, and behavior: Toward biological understanding (pp. 177–193). Westport: Praeger.
Lippa, R., & Connelly, S. (1990). Gender diagnosticity: A new bayesian approach to gender-related individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1051–1065.
Lombardo, W. K., Cretser, G. A., & Roesch, S. C. (2001). For crying out loud: The differences persist into the 90 s. Sex Roles, 45, 529–547.
Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). A broadly based analysis of mathematical giftedness. Intelligence, 14, 327–355.
Maccoby, E. E. (1966). The differences in intellectual functioning. Standord, CA: Stanford University Press.
Maccoby, E. E. (1992). The role of parents in the socialization of children: An historical overview. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1006–1017.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Martin, C. L. (1990). Attitudes and expectations about children with nontraditional and traditional gender roles. Sex Roles, 22, 151–165.
McCormack, M. (2010). Changing masculinities in youth cultures. Qualitative Sociology, 33, 111–115.
McKelvie, M., & Gold, S. R. (1994). Hyperfemininity: Further definition of the construct. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 219–228.
Merten, D. E. (1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociology of Education, 70, 175–191.
Mischel, W. (1966). A social-learning view of sex differences in behavior. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 56–81). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Morgan, B. L. (1998). A three generational study of tomboy behavior. Sex Roles, 39, 787–800.
Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68, 103–127.
Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 150–163.
Murnen, S. K., & Byrne, D. (1991). Hyperfemininity: Measurement and initial validation of the construct. Journal of Sex Research, 28, 479–489.
Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag. Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkley: University of California Press.
Payne, E. C. (2007). Heterosexism, perfection, and popularity: Young lesbians’ experiences of the high school social scene. Educational Studies: Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 41, 60–60.
Pedhazur, E. J., & Tetenbaum, T. J. (1979). Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016.
Quatman, T., Sokolik, E., & Smith, K. (2000). Adolescent perception of peer success: A gendered perspective over time. Sex Roles, 43, 61–84.
Risman, B. J., & Seale, E. (2009). Betwixt and between: Gender contradictions among middle schoolers. In B. J. Risman (Ed.), Families as they really are (pp. 340–361). New York: Norton.
Royston, P. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal, 4, 227–241.
Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277–295.
Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 207–228.
Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.
Smith, G. W. (1998). The ideology of “fag”: The school experience of gay students. Sociological Quarterly, 39, 309–335.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
StataCorp. (2005). Stata survey data reference manual, release 9. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Stockard, J. (1999). Gender socialization. In J. S. Chafetz (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 215–227). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Swearer, S. M., Turner, R. K., Givens, J. E., & Pollack, W. S. (2008). “You’re so gay!”: Do different forms of bullying matter for adolescent males? School Psychology Review, 37, 160–173.
Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347–366.
Thorne, B. (1993). Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Udry, J. R., & Chantala, K. (2004). Masculinity-femininity guides sexual union formation in adolescents. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 44–55.
Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105, 294–318.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.
Willis, P. E. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
Young, R., & Sweeting, H. (2004). Adolescent bullying, relationships, psychological well-being, and gender-atypical behavior: A gender diagnosticity approach. Sex Roles, 50, 525–537.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Irene Padavic, Robert Hood, and anonymous Sex Roles reviewers for their thoughtful comments on drafts as well as Richard Udry, Kim Chantala, and Harrington Cleveland and for their permission to use their gender type measure. This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth). No direct support was received from grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A
Appendix A
Items for Gender Type Measure
1. | In the past, 12 months, how often have you cried frequently? (F) |
2. | In the past, 12 months, how often have you been moody? (F) |
3. | In the past, 12 months, how often have you had a poor appetite? (F) |
4. | Generally, for the parts of this interview that you have answered by yourself using the computer, how honestly have you answered the questions? (F) |
5. | During the past seven days, how often were you bothered by things that usually don’t bother you? (F) |
6. | You are physically fit. (M) |
7. | In the past, 12 months, how often did you get into a serious physical fight? (M) |
8. | During the past week, how many times did you do exercise, such as jogging, walking, karate, jumping rope, gymnastics or dancing? (M) |
9. | During the past week, how many times did you go roller-blading, roller-skating, skate-boarding, or bicycling? (M) |
10. | You are emotional. (F) |
11. | You like yourself just the way you are. (M) |
12. | You live your life without much thought for the future. (M) |
13. | You are sensitive to other people’s feelings. (F) |
14. | You like to take risks. (M) |
15. | Difficult problems make you very upset. (M) |
The scale created by Udry and Chantala (2004) was modified for the present analysis. (M) indicates that the item positively predicts being a boy and negatively predicts being a girl. (F) indicates that the item positive predicts being a girl and negatively predicts being a boy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ueno, K., McWilliams, S. Gender-Typed Behaviors and School Adjustment. Sex Roles 63, 580–591 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9839-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9839-6