Sex Roles

, Volume 63, Issue 7–8, pp 530–541 | Cite as

Male Narcissism and Attitudes Toward Heterosexual Women and Men, Lesbian Women, and Gay Men: Hostility toward Heterosexual Women Most of All

  • Scott W. KeillerEmail author
Original Article


The present study investigated links between heterosexual men’s narcissism and attitudes toward heterosexual and non-heterosexual women and men. Male narcissism was predicted to be associated with hostility toward heterosexual women more than toward other groups, indicating investment in patriarchal power more than in conservative gender ideology or nonspecific disdain toward all people. Hierarchical regression analyses of responses from 104 male undergraduates (95% Caucasian) from Ohio in the U.S. supported the hypothesis that men’s narcissism is related most robustly to hostility toward women, rather than to equivalent derogation of all groups. Moreover, men’s narcissism is not merely a maker of traditional gender ideology, but instead is associated with favorable attitudes toward lesbian women and is unrelated to attitudes toward gay men.


Narcissism Ambivalent sexism Benevolent sexism Attitudes toward women Attitudes toward men Attitudes toward homosexuality 



The author thanks David DeLong and two anonymous reviewers for providing helpful feedback on previous drafts of this paper; Lynzee Abel and Erica Salisbury for assistance with data collection; and Julie Cremeans-Smith, Lee Fox-Cardamone, Deborah A. Jones, Robin Lashley, and Brad Shepherd for permitting the recruitment of research participants from their classes.


  1. Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768–776.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 851–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text Revision). Washington, DC: Author.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 440–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barron, J. M., Struckman-Johnson, C., Quevillon, R., & Banka, S. R. (2008). Heterosexual men’s attitudes toward gay men: A hierarchical model including masculinity, openness, and theoretical explanations. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 9(3), 154–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., & Campbell, W. K. (2000). Self-esteem, narcissism, and aggression: Does violence result from low self-esteem or from threatened egotism? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourgeois, K. S., & Leary, R. (2001). Coping with rejection: Derogating those who choose us last. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradlee, P. M., & Emmons, R. A. (1992). Locating narcissism within the interpersonal circumplex and the Five-Factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 821–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, R. P. (2004). Vengeance is mine: Narcissism, vengeance, and the tendency to forgive. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 576–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219–229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bushman, B. J., Bonacci, A. M., van Dijk, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Narcissism, sexual refusal, and aggression: Testing a narcissistic reactance model of sexual coercion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1027–1040.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., Thomaes, S., Ryu, E., Begeer, S., & West, S. G. (2009). Looking again, and harder, for a link between low self-esteem and aggression. Journal of Personality, 77, 427–446.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, W. K. (1999). Narcissism and romantic attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1254–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell, W. K., Foster, C. A., & Finkel, E. J. (2002a). Does self-love lead to love for others?: A story of narcissistic game playing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, W. K., Rudich, E. A., & Sedikides, C. (2002b). Narcissism, self-esteem, and the positivity of self-views: Two portraits of self-love. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 358–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, W. K., Brunell, A. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2006). Narcissism, interpersonal self-regulation, and romantic relationships: An Agency Model approach. In K. D. Vohs & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 57–83). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  17. Davies, M. (2004). Correlates of negative attitudes toward gay men: Sexism, male role norms, and male sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 259–266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. del Rosario, P. M., & White, M. (2005). The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Test-retest stability and internal consistency. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1075–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Foster, J. D., & Campbell, K. (2007). Are there such things as “Narcissists” in social psychology? A taxometric analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1321–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Twenge, J. M. (2003). Individual differences in narcissism: Inflated self-views across the lifespan and around the world. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foster, J. D., Shrira, I., & Campbell, W. K. (2006). Theoretical models of narcissism, sexuality, and relationship commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gabriel, M. T., Critelli, J. W., & Ee, J. S. (1994). Narcissistic illusions in self-evaluations of intelligence and attractiveness. Journal of Personality, 62, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glick, P., & Fiske, T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glick, P., & Fiske, T. (1999). The Ambivalence toward Men Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glick, P., & Fiske, T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118.Google Scholar
  27. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., et al. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herek, G. M. (1998). The Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men (ATLG) scale. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 392–394). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Hurlbert, D. F., Apt, C., Gasar, S., Wilson, N. E., & Murphy, Y. (1994). Sexual narcissism: A validation study. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 20, 24–34.Google Scholar
  33. Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kite, M. E., & Whitley, E. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 336–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1998). Do heterosexual women and men differ in their attitudes toward homosexuality? A conceptual and methodological analysis. In G. Herek (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (pp. 39–61). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Kohut, H. (1972). Thoughts on narcissism and narcissistic rage. The Psychoanalytic study of the child, 27, 360–399.Google Scholar
  37. Kohut, H., & Wolf, E. S. (1978). The disorders of the self and their treatment: An outline. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59, 413–425.Google Scholar
  38. Louderback, L. A., & Whitley, E. (1997). Perceived erotic value of homosexuality and sex-role attitudes as mediators of sex differences in heterosexual college students’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Madon, S. (1997). What do people believe about gay males? A study of stereotype content and strength. Sex Roles, 37, 663–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parrott, D. J., Adams, H. E., & Zeichner, A. (2002). Homophobia: Personality and attitudinal correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1269–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  43. Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197–1208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sandler, J., Person, E. S., & Fonagy, P. (Eds.). (1991). Freud’s “On narcissism: An introduction”. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, K. (2003). “Isn’t it fun to get the respect that we’re going to deserve?” Narcissism, social rejection, and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 261–272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Twenge, J. M., Konrath, S., Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Further evidence of an increase in narcissism among college students. Journal of Personality, 76, 919–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Whitley, B. E. (2001). Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex Roles, 45, 691–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Whitley, B. E., Wiederman, M. W., & Wryobeck, J. M. (1999). Correlates of heterosexual men’s eroticization of lesbianism. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 11, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilkinson, W. W. (2006). Exploring heterosexual women’s anti-lesbian attitudes. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 139–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilkinson, W. W. (2008). Threatening the patriarchy: Testing an explanatory paradigm of anti-lesbian attitudes. Sex Roles, 59, 512–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zeichner, A., Frey, F. C., Parrott, D. J., & Butryn, M. F. (1999). Measurement of laboratory aggression: A new response-choice paradigm. Psychological Reports, 85, 1229–1237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations