Skip to main content

Why Do Women Do the Lion’s Share of Housework? A Decade of Research

Abstract

The body of recent American research indicates that women continue to perform the vast majority of household labor. Understanding the conditions under which couples can achieve an egalitarian division of household labor constitutes one of the first steps in attaining gender equity in the private and public spheres. This article discusses the state of research on the division of household labor published between 2000 and 2009. After a discussion of conceptualization and methodological issues, we review empirical findings that support or challenge the micro- and macro-level perspectives (focusing on individual characteristics and national contexts, respectively) that have been proposed to explain the gendered allocation of labor. We then review studies focusing on the interplay between these two prominent perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Arrighi, B. A., & Maume, D. J. (2000). Workplace subordination and men’s avoidance of housework. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 464–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artis, J. E., & Pavalko, E. K. (2003). Explaining the decline in women’s household labor: Individual change and cohort differences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 746–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badr, H., & Acitelli, L. K. (2008). Attachment insecurity and perceptions of housework: Associations with marital well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 313–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, S. J., Blanton, P. W., & Gillard, J. L. (2005). Husbands and wives in dual-earner marriages: Decision-making, gender role attitudes, division of household labor, and equity. Marriage and Family Review, 37, 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batalova, J. A., & Cohen, P. N. (2002). Premarital cohabitation and housework: Couples in cross-national perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 743–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E., Noack, T., & Hovde Lyngstad, T. (2009). Shared housework in Norway and Sweden: Advancing the gender revolution. Journal of European Social Policy, 18, 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M., & Raley, S. B. (2005). Time allocation in families. In S. M. Bianchi, L. M. Casper, & B. R. King (Eds.), Work, family, health, and well-being (pp. 21–42). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittman, M., England, P., Sayer, L., Folbre, N., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolzendahl, C. I., & Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974-1998. Social Forces, 83, 759–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2004). The transformation of US gender role attitudes: Cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33, 106–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cha, Y., & Thébaud, S. (2009). Labor markets, breadwinning, and beliefs: How economic context shapes men’s gender ideology. Gender & Society, 23, 215–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciabattari, T. (2004). Cohabitation and housework: The effects of marital intentions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 118–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claffey, S. T., & Mickelson, K. D. (2009). Division of household labor and distress: The role of perceived fairness for employed mothers. Sex Roles, 60, 819–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S., & Adams, M. (2001). Men’s family work: Child-centered fathering and the sharing of domestic labor. In R. Hetz & N. L. Marshall (Eds.), Working families: The transformation of the American home (pp. 72–99). Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, R., Brockmann, M., & Lyonette, C. (2005). Attitudes, women’s employment and the domestic division of labour: A cross national analysis in two waves. Work, employment, and Society, 19, 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. (2001). Parental influences on the gendered division of housework. American Sociological Review, 66, 184–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. (2007). Influences of women’s employment on the gendered division of household labor over the life course: Evidence from a 31-year panel study. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 422–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S., & Greenstein, T. N. (2004). Cross-national variations in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1260–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S., Greenstein, T. N., & Gerteisen Marks, J. P. (2007). Effects of union type on division of household labor: Do cohabiting men really perform more housework? Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1246–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deven, F., & Moss, P. (2002). Leave arrangements for parents: Overview and future outlook. Community, Work & Family, 5, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R. J. (2005). Why emotion work matters: Sex, gender, and the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evertsson, M., & Nermo, M. (2007). Changing resources and the division of housework: A longitudinal study of Swedish couples. European Sociological Review, 23, 455–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, P.-L., & Marini, M. M. (2000). Influences on gender-role attitudes during the transition to adulthood. Social Science Research, 29, 258–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuwa, M., & Cohen, P. N. (2007). Housework and social policy. Social Science Research, 36, 512–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist, C. (2005). The welfare state and the home: Regime differences in domestic division of labour. European Sociological Review, 21, 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J. (2000). Changing times: Work and leisure in postindustrial society. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J., & Sullivan, O. (2003). Time use, gender, and public policy regimes. Social Politics, 10, 205–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornick, J., & Meyers, M. (2003). Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 322–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, T. N. (2009). National context, family satisfaction, and fairness in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1039–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. (2006). Her money, her time: Women’s earnings and their housework hours. Social Science Research, 35, 975–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. (2007). Autonomy, dependence, or display? The relationship between married women’s earnings and housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, J. L. (2004). Reconsidering the division of household labor: Incorporating volunteer work and informal support. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, J. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965-2003. American Sociological Review, 71, 639–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, T., & Rosenbluth, F. (2006). The political economy of gender: Explaining cross-national variation in the gender division of labor and the gender voting gap. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J., & Gerson, K. (2004). The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamo, Y. (2000). “He Said, She Said”: Assessing discrepancies in husbands’ and wives’ reports on the division of household labor. Social Science Research, 29, 459–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitterød, R. H., & Pettersen, S. V. (2006). Making up for mothers’ employed working hours? Housework and childcare among Norwegian fathers. Work, Employment, and Society, 20, 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., & Bradbury, T. N. (2007). Working relationships: Communicative patterns and strategies among couples in everyday life. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4, 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, K., & Wærness, K. (2008). National context and spouses’ housework in 34 countries. European Sociological Review, 24, 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroska, A. (2004). Divisions of domestic work: Revising and expanding the theoretical explanations. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 900–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. S. (2007). The allocation of household labor by partners in gay and lesbian couples. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 132–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S., & Smithson, J. (2006). Gender, parenthood and the changing European workplace: Young adults negotiating the work-family boundary (Project HPSE-CT-2002-00125). European Commission.

  • Lincoln, A. E. (2008). Gender, productivity, and the marital wage premium. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 806–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lothaller, H., Mikula, G., & Schoebi, D. (2009). What contributes to the (im)balanced division of family work between the sexes? Swiss Journal of Psychology, 68, 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, D. A., & Germano, L. M. (2006). The changing nature of work and its impact on the work-home interface. In F. Jones, R. J. Burke, & M. Westman (Eds.), Work-life balance: A psychological perspective (pp. 13–38). New York: Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannino, C. A., & Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Changing the division of household labor: A negotiated process between partners. Sex Roles, 56, 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnotte, K. L., Stevens, D. P., Minnotte, M. C., & Kiger, G. (2007). Emotion-work performance among dual-earner couples: Testing four theoretical perspectives. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 773–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooman, M. C., Estes, S. B., & Glass, J. L. (2007). Do workplace flexibility policies influence time spent in domestic labor? Journal of Family Issues, 28, 263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkman, A. M. (2004). Bargaining over housework: The frustrating situation of secondary wage earners. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63, 765–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, K. M., & Coltrane, S. (2009). Divisions of labor in Mexican origin and Anglo families: Structure and culture. Sex Roles, 60, 482–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poeschl, G. (2008). Social norms and the feeling of justice about unequal family practices. Social Justice Research, 21, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, B. K., & Hunter, E. (2008). Is Mom still doing it all? Work in popular advertising. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 465–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, L. C., Cohen, P. N., & Casper, L. M. (2004). Women, men and work. In R. Farley & J. Haaga (Eds.), The American people (pp. 76–106). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program. (2004). Human development report. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windebank, J. (2001). Dual-earner couples in Britain and France: Gender divisions of domestic labour and parenting work in different welfare states. Work, Employment & Society, 15, 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yodanis, C. (2005). Divorce culture and marital gender equality: A cross-national study. Gender and Society, 19, 644–659.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mylène Lachance-Grzela.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lachance-Grzela, M., Bouchard, G. Why Do Women Do the Lion’s Share of Housework? A Decade of Research. Sex Roles 63, 767–780 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9797-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9797-z

Keywords

  • Couples
  • Division of household labor
  • Gender
  • Housework