Sex Roles

, Volume 63, Issue 3–4, pp 178–183 | Cite as

Gender Differences in Experimental Disclosure: Evidence, Theoretical Explanations, and Avenues for Future Research

Feminist Forum

Abstract

Interest in emotional expression is long-standing. Given well-established gender differences in expressivity, it is surprising that researchers have not consistently examined gender as a potential moderator of outcome in the context of experimental disclosure studies. This article comments on Range and Jenkins’ (2010) research recommendations in light of the suggestion that males evidence greater benefit of disclosure than females and three gender theories: gender schema theory, social role theory, and gender socialization theory. Further avenues for research are also presented, including the examination of gender differences in subjective, expressive and physiologic indicators of emotion during disclosure. Such data could elucidate mechanisms by which persons of different genders or persons with different schemata/ social roles/ socialization histories differ on pre/ post disclosure outcomes.

Keywords

Gender Emotional expression Experimental disclosure 

References

  1. Austenfeld, J. L., & Stanton, A. L. (2008). Writing about emotions versus goals: Effects on hostility and medical care utilization moderated by emotional approach coping processes. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 35–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burn, S. M. (1996). The social psychology of gender. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Burton, C. M., & King, L. A. (2008). Effects of (very) brief writing on health: The two-minute miracle. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 9–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coyne, J. C., & Smith, D. A. (1991). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: A contextual perspective on wives’ distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 404–412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Darwin, C. (1872/2006). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
  9. Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Frattaroli, J. (2006). Experimental disclosure and its moderators: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 823–865.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kendzierski, D. (1988). Self-schemata and exercise. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kintsch, W. (1970). Memory and cognition. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 686–703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Langer, S., Hillyer, N., & Syrjala, K. (2005). Gender differences in protective buffering among cancer caregivers. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, A70.Google Scholar
  17. Langer, S. L., Rudd, M. E., & Syrjala, K. L. (2007). Protective buffering and emotional desynchrony among spousal caregivers of cancer patients. Health Psychology, 26, 635–643.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Langer, S. L., Brown, J. D., & Syrjala, K. L. (2009). Intra- and inter-personal consequences of protective buffering among cancer patients and spouses. Cancer, 115, 4311–4325.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mogk, C., Otte, S., Reinhold-Hurley, B., & Kroner-Herwig, B. (2006). Health effects of expressive writing on stressful traumatic experiences—a meta-analysis. Psycho-Social Medicine, 3.Google Scholar
  21. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  22. Pennebaker, J. W., & Beall, S. K. (1986). Confronting a traumatic event: Toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 274–281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pennebaker, J. W., & Francis, M. E. (1996). Cognitive, emotional, and language processes in disclosure. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 601–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pennebaker, J. W., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Glaser, R. (1988). Disclosure of traumas and immune function: Health implications for psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 239–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pennebaker, J. W., Barger, S. D., & Tiebout, J. (1989). Disclosure of traumas and health among Holocaust survivors. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51, 577–589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pennebaker, J. W., Colder, M., & Sharp, L. K. (1990). Accelerating the coping process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 528–537.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. J. (2007). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC2007. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Petrie, K. J., Fontanilla, I., Thomas, M. G., Booth, R. J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2004). Effect of written emotional expression on immune function in patients with immunodeficiency virus infection: A randomized trial. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 272–275.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Range, L. M., & Jenkins, S. R. (2010). Who benefits from Pennebaker’s expressive writing paradigm? Research recommendations from three gender theories. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
  30. Reynolds, M., Brewin, C. R., & Saxton, M. (2000). Emotional disclosure in school children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 151–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Roger, D., & Najarian, B. (1989). The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring emotion control. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 845–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99–135). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Smyth, J. M. (1998). Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 174–184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Smyth, J. M., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Exploring the boundary conditions of expressive writing: In search of the right recipe. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 1–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Smyth, J. M., Stone, A. A., Hurewitz, A., & Kaell, A. (1999). Effects of writing about stressful experiences on symptom reduction in patients with asthma or rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 1304–1309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Spera, S. P., Buhrfeind, E. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1994). Expressive writing and coping with job loss. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 722–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stanton, A. L., Kirk, S. B., Cameron, C. L., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2000). Coping through emotional approach: Scale construction and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1150–1169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Sworowski, L. A., Collins, C. A., Branstetter, A. D., Rodriguez-Hanley, A., et al. (2002). Randomized, controlled trial of written emotional expression and benefit finding in breast cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20, 4160–4168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Stockard, J. (1999). Gender socialization. In J. S. Chaftez (Ed.), The handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 215–227). New York: Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411–429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Trost, S. E. (2005). Protective buffering among couples coping with heart disease: Behavior, intentions, and psychological distress. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 65(9-B), 4855.Google Scholar
  43. Ullrich, P. M., & Lutgendorf, S. K. (2008). Journaling about stressful events: Effects of cognitive processing and emotional expression. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 244–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Uvnas-Moberg, K. (1998). Oxytocin may mediate the benefits of positive social interaction and emotions. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 819–835.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Work, University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations