What Is Sexual Empowerment? A Multidimensional and Process-Oriented Approach to Adolescent Girls’ Sexual Empowerment
- 3.3k Downloads
Theorists disagree about how to define the concept of empowerment. This disagreement extends to discussions of adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment. Feminists struggle with whether sexual empowerment should be conceptualized as a subjective internal feeling of power and agency or an objective measure of power and control. Defining sexual empowerment as a subjective state may mistakenly equate feelings of agency with cultural and institutional power. Yet, a subjective definition of sexual empowerment is advantageous in that it validates girls’ own experiences and perceptions. This commentary argues that sexual empowerment might best be conceptualized as a continuous and multidimensional construct. This would allow for the recognition of sexual empowerment as a developmental process, and it would allow for the acknowledgement of ambivalent empowerment.
KeywordsAdolescence Sexuality Empowerment Desire Pleasure
Zoë Peterson, Ph.D., Department of Psychology and Institute for Women and Gender Studies, University of Missouri-St. Louis.
- American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualizationrep.pdf.
- Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 29–53.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction. New York: Vintage books.Google Scholar
- Lamb, S. (2010). Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: A critique. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
- Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York: Free.Google Scholar
- Peterson, Z. D. (2008, November). Sex and power: Characteristics and consequences of sex with individuals in positions of authority. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, San Juan, Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
- Rappaport, J. (1984). Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue. Prevention in Human Services, 3, 1–7.Google Scholar
- Rubin, G. S. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. S. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267–319). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Tiefer, L. (1995). Sex is not a natural act and other essays. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
- Tolman, D. L. (2000). Object lessons: Romance, violation, and female adolescent sexual desire. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 25, 70–79.Google Scholar
- Worrell, J., & Remer, P. (1992). Feminist perspectives in therapy: An empowerment model for women. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar