How Nice of Us and How Dumb of Me: The Effect of Exposure to Benevolent Sexism on Women’s Task and Relational Self-Descriptions
This research demonstrates how women assimilate to benevolent sexism by emphasizing their relational qualities and de-emphasizing their task-related characteristics when exposed to benevolent sexism. Studies 1 (N = 62) and 2 (N = 100) show, with slightly different paradigms and measures, that compared to exposure to hostile sexism, exposure to benevolent sexism increases the extent to which female Dutch college students define themselves in relational terms and decreases the extent to which they emphasize their task-related characteristics. Study 3 (N = 79) demonstrates that benevolent sexism has more pernicious effects when it is expressed by someone with whom women expect to collaborate than when no collaboration is expected with the source of sexism. The implications of these results are discussed.
KeywordsBenevolent sexism Women’s self-descriptions Task-related and relational self-descriptions Stereotype confirmation
This research was financed by a grant from the Dutch Scientific Organization (NWO) awarded to the first author, who was at Leiden University when this research was conducted. Study 3 was part of the master thesis of the third author.
- Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Barreto, M., Ryan, M., & Schmitt, M. (2009). Introduction: Is the glass ceiling still relevant in the 21st century? In M. Barreto, M. Ryan & M. Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1993). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 1–35.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., Barber, B., & Jozefowicz, D. (1999). Linking gender to educational, occupational, and recreational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In W. B. Swann Jr., J. H. Langlois & L. Albino Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Eurobarometer (2008). Discrimination in the European Union (Country fiche: The Netherlands). Retrieved at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb_special_en.htm
- Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Merens, A., & Hermans, B. (2008). Emancipatiemonitor 2008. CBS/SCP.Google Scholar
- Powell, G. N. (1999). Reflections on the glass ceiling: Recent trends and future prospects. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of Gender and Work (pp. 325–346). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Snyder, M., & Hoover, A. (2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: the stereotype-based behaviours or the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658–672.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- World Economic Forum. The global gender gap report 2007. Retrieved at www.weforum.org