Advertisement

Sex Roles

, 61:634 | Cite as

¿Qué? Quoi? Do Languages with Grammatical Gender Promote Sexist Attitudes?

  • Benjamin D. Wasserman
  • Allyson J. Weseley
Original Article

Abstract

Languages such as French and Spanish assign a gendered article to nouns. Three experiments examined whether reading a language with grammatical gender would increase sexist attitudes. Suburban, New York high school students (N = 74, 85, 66) were randomly assigned to complete a survey of sexist attitudes in either English or a language with grammatical gender (French or Spanish). Students in the English condition expressed less sexist attitudes than students in the French or Spanish conditions, and the language used affected females more than males. When the experiment was replicated on bilingual students, similar results were found. Males also expressed more sexist attitudes than females. This study suggests that languages with grammatical gender promote sexist attitudes and have particular impact on females.

Keywords

Sexist attitudes Grammatical gender Language Gender differences 

References

  1. Baxter, J., & Kane, E. W. (1995). Dependence and independence: a cross-national analysis of gender inequality and gender attitudes. Gender and Society, 9, 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. Binghamton: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, B., Schellenberg, E. G., & Senn, C. Y. (1997). Evaluating measures of contemporary sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1, 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Capozza, D., Bonaldo, E., & Dimaggio, A. (1982). Problems of identity and social conflict: Research on ethnic groups in Italy. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 299–344). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, K. B., & Clark, M. P. (1947). Racial identification and preference in Negro children. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 169–178). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  7. Corbett, G. G., & Davies, I. R. L. (1997). A cross-cultural study of colour grouping: evidence for weak linguistic relativity. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 493–517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Decure, N. (1994). The difficulties of teaching a ‘man-made language’. Women and Language, 17, 36.Google Scholar
  9. Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisenberg, D. (1985). Grammatical sexism in Spanish. Journal of Hispanic Philology, 9, 189–196.Google Scholar
  11. Everett, D. L. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology, 46, 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferligoj, A., Frieze, I. H., & Marinaga, Y. (1993). Career plans and gender-role attitudes of college students in the United States, Japan, and Slovenia. Sex Roles, 29, 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibbons, J. L., Shkodriani, G. M., & Stiles, D. A. (1991). Adolescents’ attitudes toward family and gender roles: an international comparison. Sex Roles, 25, 625–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hahn, E. D., & Spence, J. T. (1997). The attitudes toward women scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton, M. C. (1988). Using masculine generics: does generic he increase male bias in the user’s imagery? Sex Roles, 19, 785–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobson, M. B., & Insko, W. R., Jr. (1985). Use of nonsexist pronouns as a function of one’s feminist orientation. Sex Roles, 13, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jost, J. T. (1995). Negative illusions: conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness. Political Psychology, 16, 397–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jost, J. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed-entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.Google Scholar
  20. Labrosse, C. (1999). The common-gender in French: a promising way to eliminate sexism. Women and Language, 22, 56.Google Scholar
  21. Lenneberg, E. H. (1953). Cognition in ethnolinguistics. Language, 29, 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: the role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group memberships. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 293–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A. (1998). Contemporary arguments against nonsexist language: Blaubergs (1980) revisited. Sex Roles, 39, 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
  25. Rowling, J. K. (2005a). Harry potter and the half-blood prince. New York: Scholastic.Google Scholar
  26. Rowling, J. K. (2005b). Harry potter et le prince de sang-mêlé (trans: Ménard J.F.). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  27. Rowling, J. K. (2006). Harry potter y el misterio del principe (trans: Rovira Ortega G.). Barcelona: Salamandra.Google Scholar
  28. Rudman, L. A., & Kilianski, S. E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: plus ca change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Treas, J., & Widmer, E. D. (2000). Married women’s employment over the life course: attitudes in a cross-national perspective. Social Force, 78, 1409–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Whorf, B. (1956). Language, thought, reality. Cambridge: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  32. Zimmer, T. A. (1975). Sexism in higher education: a cross-national analysis. Pacific Psychological Review, 18, 55–67.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Behavioral ScienceRoslyn High SchoolRoslyn HeightsUSA
  2. 2.Roslyn High SchoolRoslyn HeightsUSA

Personalised recommendations