Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 61, Issue 7–8, pp 461–475 | Cite as

College Students’ Descriptions of Everyday Gender Prejudice

  • Britney G. BrinkmanEmail author
  • Kathryn M. Rickard
Original Article

Abstract

This study examined 104 undergraduate college students (mean age = 19) from the Western United States regarding gender differences in their experiences of gender prejudice. Women (N = 81) and men (N = 22) responded to an online diary for 14 days, resulting in 1008 descriptions of events. Women reported significantly higher levels of negative affect than men during the experiences. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze event descriptions and three main themes emerged including target of the event, perpetrator and setting. Significant differences were found for target and perpetrator based upon the gender of the participant. There were also significant differences in the distribution of the type of event (gender role stereotypes, sexual objectification or demeaning events) based on the setting and target.

Keywords

Targets of gender prejudice College students Perpetrators of gender prejudice Types of gender prejudice Setting of gender prejudice 

References

  1. Alexander, S. M. (2003). Stylish hard bodies: branded masculinity in men’s health magazine. Sociological Perspectives, 46, 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubrey, J. S. (2007). The impact of sexually objectifying media exposure on negative body emotions and sexual self-perceptions: Investigating the mediating role of body self-consciousness. Mass Communication & Society, 10, 1–23.Google Scholar
  3. Barickman, R., Paludi, M., & Rabinowitz, V. C. (1992). Sexual harassment of students: Victims of the college experience. In E. Viano (Ed.), Critical issues in victimology: International perspectives (pp. 153–165). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, R. S., Burgess, M. L., & Kao, C. F. (1991). Detecting and labeling prejudice: Do female perpetrators go undetected? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bretl, D.J., & Cantor, J. (1988). The portrayal of men and women in U.S. television commercials: A recent content analysis and trends over 15 years. Sex Roles, 18, 595–609.Google Scholar
  6. Brinkman, B. G., & Rickard, K. M. (2009). Factors related to college women's responses to gender prejudice. responses considered and reasons given for not responding: Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  7. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex role stereotypes: A current appraisal. The Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.Google Scholar
  8. Calogero, R. (2004). A test of objectification theory: The effect of male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr, P. L., Ash, A. S., Friedman, R. H., Szalacha, L., Barnett, R. C., Palepu, A., et al. (2000). Faculty perceptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment in academic medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine, 132, 889–896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleary, J. S., Schmieler, C. R., Parascenzo, I. C., & Ambrosio, N. (1994). Sexual harassment of college students: Implications for campus health promotion. Journal of American College Health, 43, 3–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chekroun, P., & Brauer, M. (2002). The bystander effect and social control behavior: The effect of the presence of others on people’s reactions to norm violations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 853–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cortina, L., Swan, R. J., Fitzgerald, L., & Waldo, C. (1998). Sexual harassment and assault: Chilling the climate for women in academia. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cournoyer, R. J., & Mahalik, J. R. (1995). Cross-sectional study of gender role conflict examining college-aged and middle-aged men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. The American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dansky, B., & Kilpatrick, D. (1997). Effects of sexual harassment. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research and treatment (pp. 152–174). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  16. Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Souza, E., & Solberg, J. (2004). Women's and men's reactions to man-to-man sexual harassment: Does the sexual orientation of the victim matter? Sex Roles, 50, 623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dietz-Uhler, B., & Murrell, A. (1992). College students’ perceptions of sexual harassment: Are gender differences decreasing? Journal of College Student Development, 33, 540–546.Google Scholar
  19. Eckes, T., & Trautner, H. M. (eds). (2000). The developmental social psychology of gender. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Fineran, S. (2002). Adolescents at work: Gender issues and sexual harassment. Violence Against Women, 8, 953–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fiske, S. T., & Stevens, L. E. (1993). What's so special about sex? Gender stereotypes and discrimination. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society. Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp. 173–196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Fitzgerald, L., & Swan, S. (1995). Why didn't she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women's responses to sexual harassment. The Journal of Social Issues, 51, 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Folkman, S., Lazarus, R., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  26. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Groesz, L. M., Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2002). The effect of experimental presentation of think media images on body satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gruber, J. E. (1998). The impact of male work environments and organizational policies on women’s experiences of sexual harassment. Gender & Society, 12, 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harper, S. R., Harris, F., & Mmeje, K. C. (2005). A theoretical model to explain the overrepresentation of college men among campus judicial offenders: Implications for campus administrators. NASPA Journal, 42, 565–588.Google Scholar
  30. Harrison, K., & Fredrickson, B.L. (2003). Women’s sports media, self-objectification and mental health in black and white adolescent females. The Journal of Communication, (June), 216–232. Google Scholar
  31. Hebl, M. R., King, E. B., & Lin, J. (2004). The swimsuit becomes us all: Ethnicity, gender and vulnerability to self-objectification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1322–1331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hyers, L. L. (2007). Resisting prejudice every day: Exploring women’s assertive responses to anti-black racism, anti-semitism, heterosexism, and sexism. Sex Roles, 56, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Irving, L. M., & Berel, S. R. (2001). Comparison of media-literacy programs to strengthen college women's resistance to media images. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2004). A stress and coping perspective on confronting sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kalof, L., Eby, K. K., Matheson, J. L., & Kroska, R. J. (2001). The influence of race and gender on student self-reports of sexual harassment by college professors. Gender & Society, 15, 282–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Krieger, N., Waterman, C. H., Bates, L. M., Stoddard, A., Quinne, M. M., Sorensen, G., et al. (2006). Social hazards on the job: Workplace abuse, sexual harassment, and racial discrimination- A study of black, latino, and white low-income women and men workers in the United States. International Journal of Health Services, 36, 51–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krueger, J., & Rothbart, M. (1988). Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 187–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Larson, M. S. (2003). Gender, race, and aggression in television commercials that feature children. Sex Roles, 48, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Latane´, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 215–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Latane´, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  41. Lauren, M. M., & Dozier, D. M. (2002). Maintaining the double standard: Portrayals of age and gender in popular films. Sex Roles, 52, 437–446.Google Scholar
  42. Lee, V. E., Croninger, R. G., Linn, R., & Chen, X. (1996). The culture of sexual harassment in secondary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 383–417.Google Scholar
  43. Lott, B. (1995). Distancing from women: interpersonal sexist discrimination. In B. Lott & D. Maluso (Eds.), Combating sexual harassment in higher education (pp. 229–244). Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar
  44. Magely, V. J., Hulin, C. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & DeNardo, M. (1999). Outcomes of self-labeling sexual harassment. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 390–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mazer, D. B., & Percival, E. F. (1989). Students' experiences of sexual harassment at a small university. Sex Roles, 20, 1573–2762.Google Scholar
  46. McKinley, N. M. (1998). Gender differences in undergraduates’ body esteem: The mediating effect of objectified body consciousness and actual/ideal weight discrepancy. Sex Roles, 39, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morry, M. M., & Staska, S. L. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33, 269–279.Google Scholar
  48. Noll, S., & Fredrickson, B. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Neil, J. M. (1981). Male sex role conflicts, sexism, and masculinity: Psychological implications for men, women, and the counseling psychologist. The Counseling Psychologist, 9, 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Neil, J. M., Good, G., & Holmes, S. (1995). Fifteen years of theory and research on men’s gender role conflict: new paradigms for empirical research. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 164–206). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  51. Paludi, M., & Barickman, R. (1991). Academic and workplace sexual harassment: A resource manual. New York, NY: SUNY.Google Scholar
  52. Pope, H. G., Olivardia, R., Gruber, A., & Borowiecki, J. (1999). Evolving ideals of male body image as seen through action toys. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 26, 65–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Popovich, P. M., Licata, B. J., Nokovich, D., Martelli, T., & Zoloty, S. (1986). Assessing the incidence and perception of sexual harassment behaviors among American undergraduates. The Journal of Psychology, 120, 387–396.Google Scholar
  54. Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rajecki, D. W., Dame, J. A., Creek, K. J., Barrickman, P. J., & Reid, C. A. (1993). Gender casting in television toy advertisements: Distributions, message content analysis, and evaluations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2, 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reilly, M. E., Lott, B., & Gallogly, S. M. (1986). Sexual harassment of university students. Sex Roles, 15, 333–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roberts, T.-A., & Gettman, J. (2004). Mere exposure: Gender differences in the negative effects of priming on a state of self-objectification. Sex Roles, 51, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rodin, M. J., Price, J. M., Bryson, J. B., & Sanchez, F. J. (1990). Asymmetry in prejudice attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Runtz, M. G., & O’Donnell, C. W. (2003). Students’ perceptions of sexual harassment: Is it harassment only if the offender is a man and the victim is a woman? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 963–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Kobrynowicz, D., & Owen, S. (2002). Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shepela, S. T., & Levesque, L. L. (1998). Poisoned waters: Sexual harassment and the college climate. Sex Roles, 38, 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Signorielli, N., & Bacue, A. (1999). Recognition and respect: A content analysis of primetime television characters across three decades. Sex Roles, 40, 527–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Slater, A., & Tiggeman, M. (2002). A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 46, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes and sexist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stangor, C., Swim, J. K., Sechrist, G. B., Decoster, J., VanAllen, K. L., & Ottenbreit, A. (2003). Ask, answer, and announce: Three stages in perceiving and responding to discrimination. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 277–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Swim, J. K., Cohen, L. L., & Hyers, L. L. (1998). Experiencing everyday prejudice and discrimination. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: the target’s perspective (pp. 37–60). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  67. Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. L. (2001). Everyday sexism: evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. The Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., & Porter, L. E. (1994). Dimensions of perceived discrimination: The personal/group discrimination discrepancy. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario Symposium, 7 (pp. 233–255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  69. van Roosmalen, E., & McDaniel, S. A. (1998). Sexual harassment in academia: A hazard to women’s health. Women & Health, 28, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vorauer, J. D., & Kumhyr, S. M. (2001). Is this about you or me? Self-versus other-directed judgments and feelings in response to intergroup interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 706–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.UrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations