A small number of previous studies using convenience samples from outside Canada, and mostly for males, show positive relationships between physical height and holding a position of authority as a manager or supervisor. The present study employs Multiple Classification Analysis to assess the generality of these patterns to a representative sample of full-time Canadian workers (2,210 males and 1,815 females) using seven alternative measures of authority status. The results for male workers, after controls, generally show significant positive relationships between height and authority status. The controlled analyses for female workers, however, do not. Additional analyses for males show height to be a comparatively strong predictor relative to other social background predictors of authority status. Alternative interpretations of the patterns of findings are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Andrews, F., Morgan, J., Sonquist, J., & Klein, L. (1973). Multiple classification analysis (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational reform and the construction of economic life. New York: Basic Books.
Case, A. C., & Paxson, C. H. (2006). Stature and status: Height, ability, and labor market outcomes. NBER Working Paper 12466. Retrieved April 10, 2008, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12466
Connor Gorber, S., Tremblay, M., Moher, D., & Gorber, B. (2007). A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: A systematic review. Obesity Reviews, 8, 307–326.
Cuneo, C. J., & Curtis, J. (1975). Social ascription in the educational and occupational attainment of urban Canadians. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. La Revue Canadienne de Sociologie et d’Anthropologie, 12, 6–24.
Curtis, J., Grabb, E., & Guppy, N. (Eds.). (2004). Social inequality in Canada: Patterns, problems, and policies (4th ed.). Scarborough, ON: Prentice-Hall.
Dannenmaier, W. D., & Thumin, F. J. (1964). Authority status as a factor in perceptual distortion of size. The Journal of Social Psychology, 63, 361–365.
Deck, L. P. (1968). Buying brains by the inch. Journal of College and University Personnel Association, 19, 33–37.
Demirjian, A. (1980). Anthropometry report: Height, weight and body dimensions. Ottawa: Department of Health and Welfare, Nutrition Division.
Egolf, D. B., & Corder, L. E. (1991). Height differences of low and high job status, female and male corporate employees. Sex Roles, 24, 365–373.
Feldman, S. D. (1975). The presentation of shortness in everyday life—height and heightism in American society. In S. D. Feldman, & G. W. Theilbar (Eds.), Lifestyles: Diversity in American society (pp. 437–444, 2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Frieze, I. H., Olson, J. E., & Good, D. C. (1990). Perceived and actual discrimination in the salaries of male and female managers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 46–67.
Gillis, J. S. (1982). Too tall, too small. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Goffman, E. (1976). Gender and advertisements. New York: Harper and Row.
Green, D.A., & Kesselman, J. R. (Eds.). (2006). Dimensions of inequality in Canada. Vancouver, BC: UBC.
Guppy, N., & Arai, B. (1993). Who benefits from higher education? Differences by sex, social class and ethnic background. In J. Curtis, E. Grabb, & N. Guppy (Eds.), Social inequality in Canada: Patterns, problems, and policies (pp. 214–232, 3rd ed.). Scarborough, ON: Prentice Hall.
Higham, P. A., & Carment, D. W. (1992). The rise and fall of politicians: The judged heights of Broadbent, Mulroney and Turner before and after the 1988 Canadian federal election. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 24, 404–409.
Jones, F. E. (1985). Educational and occupational attainment: Individual achievement. In M. Boyd, J. Goyder, F. E. Jones, H. McRoberts, P. C. Pineo, & J. Porter (Eds.), Ascription and achievement: Studies in mobility and status attainment in Canada (pp. 101–163). Ottawa: Carleton University Press.
Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 428–441.
Keyes, R. (1980). The height of your life. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Lass, N. J., Andes, S. E., McWair, C. D., Cline, A. L., & Pecora, M. C. (1982). Correlational study of subjects’ self-reported and measured heights and weights. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 102.
Marmot, M. G. (1986). The social environment. In R. G. Wilkinson (Ed.), Class and health: Research and longitudinal data (pp. 21–33). London: Tavistock.
Martel, L. F., & Biller, H. B. (1987). Stature and stigma: The biopsychosocial development of short males. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Masur, A., Masur, J., & Keating, C. (1984). Military rank attainment of a West Point class: Effects of cadets’ physical features. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 125–150.
Melamed, T., & Bozionelos, N. (1992). Managerial promotion and height. Psychological Reports, 71, 587–593.
Millar, W. J. (1986). Distribution of body weight and height: Comparisons of estimates based on self-reported and observed measures. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 125, 122–126.
Nahkaie, R. M., & Curtis, J. (1998). Effects of class position of parents on educational attainment of daughters and sons. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. La Revue Canadienne de Sociologie et d’Anthropologie, 70, 483–515.
Norusis, M. J. (1993). SPSS for windows base system, user’s guide, release 6.0. Chicago: SPSS.
Palta, M., Prineas, R. J., Berman, R., & Hannan, P. (1982). Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight. American Journal of Epidemiology, 115, 223–230.
Persico, N., Postlewaite, A., & Silverman, D. (2004). The effect of adolescent experience on labor market outcomes: The case of height. The Journal of Political Economy, 112, 1019–1053.
Pineo, P. C., Porter, J., & McRoberts, H. A. (1977). The 1971 census and the socioeconomic classification of occupations. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. La Revue Canadienne de Sociologie et d’Anthropologie, 14, 91–102.
Roberts, J. V., & Herman, C. P. (1986). The psychology of height: An empirical review. In C. P. Herman, M. P. Zanna, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Physical appearance, stigma, and social behavior (pp. 113–140). Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
Robinson, R. V. (1984). Reproducing class relations in industrial capitalism. American Sociological Review, 49, 182–196.
Salska, I., Frederick, D. A., Pawlowski, B., Reilly, A. H., Laird, K. T., & Rudd, N. A. (2008). Conditional mate preferences: Factors influencing preferences for height. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 203–215.
Shepperd, J. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1989). Attractiveness and height: The role of stature in dating preference, frequency of dating, and perceptions of attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 617–627.
Sorokin, P. (1959). Social and cultural mobility. Glencoe, IL: Free.
Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232.
Statistics Canada (1995). The 1994 General Social Survey—Cycle 9, education, work and retirement: Public use microdata file documentation and user’s guide. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.
Stewart, A. L. (1982). The reliability and validity of self-reported weight and height. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 35, 292–309.
Tom, G., & Shevell, J. (1986). The height of success. Sociology and Social Research, 71, 15–18.
Wilkinson, R. (1996). Unhealthy societies: The afflictions of inequality. London: Routledge.
Wilson, P. R. (1968). Perceptual distortions of height as a function of ascribed academic status. The Journal of Social Psychology, 74, 97–102.
We acknowledge with thanks that our data source was made available by the Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, Statistics Canada, and that the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council provided funding for our work. Also, we owe thanks to Terry Stewart for his very helpful assistance with the analyses, and to Julie Dembski and Terry Stewart for their helpful comments on earlier drafts.
This article is dedicated to the extraordinary life and career of Professor James Curtis. His innovative promotion and advancement of Canadian sociology and psychology through teaching, research and heartfelt mentorship will always be remembered.
About this article
Cite this article
Gawley, T., Perks, T. & Curtis, J. Height, Gender, and Authority Status at Work: Analyses for a National Sample of Canadian Workers. Sex Roles 60, 208–222 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9520-5
- Authority status