Sex Roles

, 60:142 | Cite as

Men’s Empathic Bias, Empathic Inaccuracy, and Sexual Harassment

  • William E. Schweinle
  • Carol Cofer
  • Sandra Schatz
Original Article

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between men’s sexual harassment of women and men accuracy and bias when inferring women’s critical or rejecting thoughts and feelings. Eighty married men from the Arlington, Texas, USA community participated. Results indicated that men’s sexual harassment behavior is negatively related to men’s accuracy in determining when women have critical or rejecting thoughts or feelings. Further, men’s sexual harassment behavior is positively related to men’s bias to overattribute criticism and rejection. This pattern of findings suggests that male sexual harassers tend to over-infer women’s criticism and rejection and make these inferences at the wrong times. These findings also support recent speculation that men’s sexual harassment of women is related to aggression rather than seduction.

Keywords

Sexual harassment Aggression Empathic accuracy Overattribution bias Signal detection 

References

  1. Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: do males misperceive females’ friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avakame, E. (1998). Intergenerational transmission of violence and psychological aggression against wives. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 30, 193–202.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, D., Terpstra, D., & Cutler, B. (1990). Perceptions of sexual harassment: a re-examination of gender differences. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 124, 409–416.Google Scholar
  4. Begany, J., & Milburn, M. (2002). Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 3, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunswig, K., & O’Donohue, W. (2002). Relapse Prevention for Sexual Harassers. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  6. Charney, D., & Russell, R. (1994). An overview of sexual harassment. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 10–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dobrich, W., & Dranoff, S. (2000). The first line of defense, a guide to protecting yourself against sexual harassment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Dodge, K., & Crick, N. (1990). Social information-processing bases of aggressive behavior in children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dodge, K., Pettit, G., McClaskey, C., & Brown, M. (1986). Social competence in children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 51(2), 1–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 121, 275–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Downey, G., Feldman, S., & Ayduk, O. (2000). Rejection sensitivity and male violence in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 7, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dutton, D. (1998). The abusive personality. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  13. Dutton, D., & Hemphill, K. (1992). Patterns of socially desirable responding among perpetrators and victims of wife assault. Violence and Victims, 7, 29–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehrensaft, M., & Vivian, D. (1999). Is partner aggression related to appraisals of coercive control by a partner? Journal of Family Violence, 14, 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitzgerald, L., Shullman, S., Bailey, N., & Richards, M. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleiss, J. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd Ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Gable, S., Reis, H., & Downey, G. (2003). A quasi-signal detection analysis of daily interactions between close relationship partners. Psychological Science, 14, 100–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton, J., Aalgna, S., King, L., & Lloyd, C. (1987). The emotional consequences of gender-based abuse in the workplace: new counseling programs for sex discrimination. Women & Therapy, 6, 155–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hand, J., & Sanchez, L. (2000). Badgering or bantering? Gender differences in experience of, and reactions to, sexual harassment among U.S. high school students. Gender & Society, 14, 718–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanley, M., & O’Neill, P. (1997). Violence and commitment: a study of dating couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 685–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Smutzler, N. (1996). Comparing the emotional reactions and behavioral intentions of violent and nonviolent husbands to aggressive, distressed, and other wife behaviors. Violence and Victims, 11, 319–339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ickes, W. (Ed.). (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  23. Ickes, W., Stinson, L., Bissonnette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: empathic accuracy in mixed sex diads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 730–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, J., Benson, C., Teasdale, A., Simmons, S., & Reed, W. (1997). Perceptual ambiguity, gender, and target intoxication: assessing the effects of factors that moderate perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1209–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jouriles, E., & O’Leary, K. (1985). Interspousal reliability of reports of marital violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 419–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lisak, D., & Roth, S. (1988). Motivational factors in nonincarcerated sexually aggressive men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 795–802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Long, B. (1998). Sexual harassment: a case of workplace aggression. Psychiatric Annals, 28, 260–264.Google Scholar
  29. Loy, P., & Stewart, L. (1984). The extent and effects of the sexual harassment of working women. Sociological Focus, 17, 31–43.Google Scholar
  30. MacMillan, N., & Creelman, C. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  31. MacMillan, R., Nierobisz, A., & Welsh, S. (2000). Experiencing the streets: harassment and perceptions of safety among women. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 306–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marangoni, C., Garcia, S., Ickes, W., & Teng, G. (1995). Empathic accuracy in a clinically relevant setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 854–869.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McFall, R. (1982). A review and reformulation of the concept of social skills. Behavioral Assessment, 4, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moore, T., Eisler, R., & Franchina, J. (2000). Causal attributions and affective responses to provocative female partner behavior by abusive and nonabusive males. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Leary-Kelly, A., Paetzold, R., & Griffin, R. (2000). Sexual harassment as aggressive behavior: an actor-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25, 372–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paludi, M., & Barickman, R. (1991). Academic and workplace sexual harassment. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  37. Pryor, J. (1987). Sexual harassment proclivities in men. Sex Roles, 17, 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pryor, J., & Stoller, L. (1994). Sexual cognition processes in men high in the likelihood to sexually harass. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ragins, B., & Scandura, T. (1995). Antecedents of work related correlates of reported sexual harassment: an empirical investigation of competing hypotheses. Sex Roles, 32, 429–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rederstorff, J., Buchanan, N., & Settles, I. (2007). The moderating roles of race and gender-role attitudes in the relationship between sexual harassment and psychological well-being. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rotundo, M., Nguyen, D., & Sackett, P. (2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 914–922.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ryan, K. (1998). The relationship between courtship violence and sexual aggression in college students. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saal, F., Johnson, C., & Weber, N. (1989). Friendly or sexy? It may depend on whom you ask. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saunders, D. (1991). Procedures for adjusting self-reports of violence for social desirability bias. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 336–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schweinle, W., & Ickes, W. (2007). The role of men’s critical/rejecting overattribution bias, affect and attentional disengagement in marital aggression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 173–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schweinle, W., Ickes, W., & Bernstein, I. H. (2002). Empathic inaccuracy in husband to wife aggression: the overattribution bias. Personal Relationships, 9, 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics (CT) scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Szinovacz, M. (1983). Using couple data as a methodological tool: the case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Terpstra, D., & Baker, D. (1989). The identification and classification of reactions to sexual harassment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tolman, R. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Turkat, I., Keane, S., & Thompson-Pope, S. (1990). Social processing errors among paranoid personalities. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 12, 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Woody, R., & Perry, N. (1993). Sexual harassment victims: psycholegal and family therapy considerations. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 136–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • William E. Schweinle
    • 1
  • Carol Cofer
    • 2
  • Sandra Schatz
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Health SciencesUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA
  2. 2.School of Social WorkTexas State UniversitySan MarcosUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA

Personalised recommendations