Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective

Abstract

Intersectionality, the mutually constitutive relations among social identities, is a central tenet of feminist thinking and has transformed how gender is conceptualized in research. In this special issue, we focus on the intersectionality perspective in empirical research on gender. Our goal is to offer a “best practices” resource that provides models for when and how intersectionality can inform theory and be incorporated into empirical research on psychological questions at individual, interpersonal, and social structural levels. I briefly summarize the development of the intersectionality perspective, and then review how the realization of its promise has been diverted by preoccupation with intersectionality as a methodological challenge. I conclude with a discussion of why intersectionality is an urgent issue for researchers invested in promoting positive social change.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20, 441–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1983). Contextualising feminism: gender, ethnic and class divisions. Feminist Review, 15, 62–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baca Zinn, M., & Thornton Dill, B. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22, 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bacchi, C. L. (1990). Same difference: Feminism and sexual difference. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barker, D. K. (2005). Beyond women and economics: rereading “Women’s Work.”. Signs, 30, 2189–2209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhatia, S. (2007). American karma. NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bograd, M. (1999). Strengthening domestic violence theories: intersections of race, class, sexual orientation, and gender. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25, 275–289.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black Lesbian Woman ≠ Black Lesbian Woman: the methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, this issue.

  10. Burman, E. (2005). Engendering culture in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 15, 527–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Camic, P. M., Rhodes, J. E., & Yardley, L. (Eds.) (2003). Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cole, E. (2008). Coalitions as a model for intersectionality: From practice to theory. Sex Roles, this issue.

  14. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Crenshaw, K. W. (1994/2005). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In M. A. Fineman, & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 93–118). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Diamond L. & Butterworth, M. (2008). Questioning gender and sexual identity: Dynamic links over time. Sex Roles, this issue.

  18. Dill, B. T. (1983). Race, class and gender: prospects for an inclusive sisterhood. Feminist Studies, 9, 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dottolo, A. L. & Stewart, A. L. (2008). “Don’t ever forget now, you’re a Black man in America”: Intersections of race, class and gender in encounters with the police. Sex Roles, this issue.

  20. Eagly, A. H. (1998). On comparing women and men. In D. L. Anselmi, & A. L. Law (Eds.), Questions of gender. NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gamson, J., & Moon, D. (2004). The sociology of sexualities: queer and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goff, P. A., Thomas, M. A., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). “Ain’t I a woman?”: Towards an intersectional approach to person perception and group-based harms. Sex Roles, this issue.

  23. Greenwood, R. M., & Christian, A. (2008). What happens when we unpack the invisible knapsack? Intersectional political consciousness and inter-group appraisals. Sex Roles, this issue.

  24. Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1988). The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. The American Psychologist, 43, 455–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M., & Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it. The American Psychologist, 60, 27–36.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hull, G. T., Scott, P. B., Smith, B. (Eds.) (1982). All the women are white, all the blacks are men, but some of us are brave: black women’s studies. Old Westbury, NY: Feminist.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hurtado, A. & Sinha, M. (2008). More than men: Latino feminist masculinities and intersectionality. Sex Roles, this issue.

  28. Kennedy, H. (2005). Subjective intersections in the face of the machine: gender, race, class and PCs in the home. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12, 471–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Knapp, G. (2005). Race, class, gender: reclaiming baggage in fast travelling theories. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12, 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mahalingam, R. (2006). Cultural psychology of immigrants: An introduction. In R. Mahalingam (Ed.), Cultural psychology of immigrants (pp. 1–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mahalingam, R., Balan, S., & Haritatos, J. (2008). Engendering immigrant psychology: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, this issue.

  33. Marchel, C., & Owens, S. (2007). Qualitative research in psychology: could William James get a job? History of Psychology, 10, 301–324.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mattis J., Grayman, N., Cowie, S., Winston, C., Watson, C., & Jackson, D. (2008). Intersectional identities and the politics of altruistic care in a low-income, urban community. Sex Roles, this issue.

  35. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (1981). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. Watertown, MA: Persephone.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Morawski, J. (1994). Practicing feminisms, reconstructing psychology: notes on a liminal science. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mullings, L. (1997). On our own terms: race, class, and gender in the lives of African American women. NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mullings, L., & Schulz, A. J. (2006). Intersectionality and health. In A. J. Schulz (Ed.), Gender, race, class, and health: intersectional approaches (pp. 3–17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nakano Glenn, E. (1999). The social construction and institutionalization of gender and race: An integrative framework. In M. M. Feree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 3–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Purdie-Vaughns, V. & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The ideological sources and social consequences of the non-prototypicality of intersectional subordinates. Sex Roles, this issue.

  42. Reid, P. T. (1993). Poor women in psychological research: shut up and shut out. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Reid, P. T. (2000). Multicultural psychology: bringing together gender and ethnicity. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Richards, G. (2002). The psychology of psychology: a historically grounded sketch. Theory & Psychology, 12, 7–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Riger, S. (2000). Transforming psychology: gender in theory and practice. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18, 429–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Settles, I. H. (2006). Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles, 54, 589–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shields, S. A. (1998). Illusions of progress and “insurgent science.”. Feminism & Psychology, 8, 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shields, S. A. (2002). Speaking from the heart: gender and the social meaning of emotion. NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Shields, S. A., & Bhatia, S. (in press). Darwin on race, gender, and culture. American Psychologist.

  51. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Spelman, E. (1988). Inessential woman. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Stewart, A. J., & Dottolo, A. L. (2006). Feminist psychology. Signs, 31, 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Stoppard, J. M., & McMullen, L. M. (Eds.) (2003). Situating sadness: women and depression in social context. NY: NYU.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Townsend, T. G. (2008). Protecting our daughters: Intersection of race, class and gender in African American mothers’ socialization of their daughters’ heterosexuality. Sex Roles, this issue.

  56. Unger, R. K. (1983). Through the looking glass: no wonderland yet! (The reciprocal relationship between methodology and models of reality). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Walker, A. (2003). Methods, theory and the practice of feminist research: a response to Janet Chafetz. Journal of Family Studies, 25, 990–994.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Warner, L. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, this issue.

  59. Weber, L. (2004). A conceptual framework for understanding race, class, gender, and sexuality. In S. N. Hesse-Biber, & M. L. Yaiser (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on social research (pp. 121–139). NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Weisstein, N. (1968). Psychology constructs the female. Retrieved January, 2008, from http://www.cwluherstory.org/psychology-constructs-the-female.html.

  61. Weisstein, N. (1993). Power, resistance, and science: a call for a revitalized feminist psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 3, 239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. White, A. M. (2008). Ain’t I a feminist?: African American men speak out on fatherhood, friendship, forgiveness, and freedom. Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Sex Roles editor, Irene Frieze, for her enthusiasm and support for this special issue. I thank Matthew Zawadzki and Leah Warner for their insightful comments on a draft of this introduction.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie A. Shields.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shields, S.A. Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective. Sex Roles 59, 301–311 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Feminist psychology
  • Social identity
  • Intersectionality theory
  • Hybridity
  • Feminist theory