Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Using Egalitarian Items to Measure Men’s and Women’s Family Roles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to show that measuring gender ideology by egalitarian items might be problematic, as gender egalitarianism is not simply the reverse of gender traditionalism and includes very different stances. Egalitarian items are likely to lead to an insufficient discrimination between traditional and non-traditional respondents. While the former often ignore the egalitarian stance, the latter hold different egalitarian positions which prevents agreement with any specific item. Empirical evidence is reported from quantitative and qualitative data: an international survey based on random samples (n = 5.692) and a cognitive study, which was conducted in Germany by both internet (n = 889) and telephone (n = 285). Here, the selection of a response category was analyzed by using probing questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beere, C. A. (1990). Gender roles. A handbook of tests and measures. New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beere, C. A., King, D. W., Beere, D. B., & King, L. A. (1984). The sex-role egalitarianism scale: a measure of attitudes toward equality between the sexes. Sex Roles, 10, 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosnjak, M. (2001). Participation in non-restricted web surveys: A typology and explanatory model for item non-response. In U. -D. Reips, & M. Bosnjak (Eds.) Dimensions of internet science (pp. 193–207). Lengerich: Pabst Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, M. (1998). Gender roles. In J. W. van Deth (Ed.) Comparative politics: The problem of equivalence (pp. 111–134). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogan, D., & Kutner, N. G. (1976). Measuring sex-role orientation: a normative approach. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A., & Furstenberg, F. F. (1988). The changing European family: Lessons for the American reader. Journal of Family Issues, 9, 291–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A., & Jowell, R. (1990). Measuring national differences: an introduction to the International Social Survey Program (ISSP). In R. Jowell, S. Witherspoon, & L. Brook (Eds.) British social attitudes: Special international report (pp. 1–13). Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A., Smith, T. W., & Marsden, P. V. (2005). General social surveys, 1972–2004: cumulative codebook. Chicago: NORC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, E. R., & Wellens, T. R. (1997). Perspectives on pretesting: “cognition” in the cognitive interview? Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 55, 18–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J. L., Hamby, B. A., & Dennis, W. D. (1997). Researching gender-role ideologies internationally and cross-culturally. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, M., & Höllinger, F. (1994). Female employment and the change of gender roles: The conflictual relationship between participation and attitudes in international comparison. International Sociology, 9, 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hieden-Sommer, H. (1994). Soziologische Forschung und politische Interessen: Vorurteile und Frauen benachteiligende Begriffe in empirischen Studien zur Arbeitsteilung in den Familien [Sociological research and political interests: prejudices and notions discriminating women in empirical studies on the division of labor in families]. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19, 58–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höllinger, F. (1991). Frauenerwerbstätigkeit und Wandel der Geschlechtsrollen im internationalen Vergleich [Female labor force participation and change of gender roles in international comparison]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 43, 753–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1986). Validity of the sex-role egalitarianism scale: discriminating egalitarianism from feminism. Sex Roles, 15, 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1997). Sex-role egalitarianism scale. Development, psychometric properties, and recommendations for future research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, K. S., & Long, E. (1988). Attitudes toward sex-roles: traditional or egalitarian? Sex Roles, 19, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupri, E. (1983). The changing position of women in family and society: a cross-national comparison. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacInnes, J. (1998). Analysing patriarchy capitalism and women’s employment in Europe. Innovation, 11, 227–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O., & Bumpass, L. L. (1975). U.S. women’s sex-role ideology, 1970. American Journal of Sociology, 80, 1212–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O., Czajka, J. L., & Arber, S. (1976). Change in U.S. women’s sex-role attitudes, 1964–1974. American Sociological Review, 41, 573–596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O., & Lu, Y. -H. (1988). Attitudes toward women’s familial roles: Changes in the United States, 1977–1985. Gender & Society, 2, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1997). The measurement of gender-role attitudes. A review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilcher, J. (1998). Gender matters? Three cohorts of women talking about role reversal. Sociological Research Online, 3(1). Retrieved 2/20/2007, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/3/1/10.html.

  • Scott, J., Alwin, D. F., & Braun, M. (1996). Generational changes in gender-role attitudes: Britain in a cross-national perspective. Sociology, 30, 471–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1972). The attitudes toward women scale: an objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity & femininity. Their psychological dimensions, correlates, & antecedents. Austin & London: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., & Freedman, D. (1979). Changes in the sex role attitudes of women, 1962–1977: Evidence from a panel study. American Sociological Review, 44, 831–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G. B., & Schechter, S. (1997). Evaluation of cognitive interviewing techniques: do the results generalize to the field? Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 55, 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung (1990). ISSP 1988: family and sex roles. Codebook ZA study 1700. Köln: Zentralarchiv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung (1997). ISSP 1994: family and changing gender roles II. Codebook ZA study 2620 (2nd ed.). Köln: Zentralarchiv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung (2004). ISSP 2002: family and changing fender roles III. Codebook ZA study 3880. Köln: Zentralarchiv.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank the editor of this journal, Irene H. Frieze, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. I also gratefully acknowledge support of this research by the Fritz Thyssen Foundation, Cologne.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GESIS-ZUMA, P.O. Box 12 21 55, 68072, Mannheim, Germany

    Michael Braun

Authors
  1. Michael Braun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Braun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braun, M. Using Egalitarian Items to Measure Men’s and Women’s Family Roles. Sex Roles 59, 644–656 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9468-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9468-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation