Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Psychological Consequences of Failing to Attribute Negative Outcomes to Discrimination

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research examines the psychological consequences of not making attributions to discrimination in response to negative feedback. In two studies, 100 and 80, respectively, female undergraduates at large US research universities were exposed to conditions that simulated three distinct reasons for not making an attribution to discrimination which parallel three theoretical information processing stages. The psychological consequences examined included changes in activation of and explicit thoughts about sexism, affective state, excuses for poor performances, and negative attitudes toward the perpetrator. Results illustrated that there are psychological consequences of failing to make an attribution to discrimination, and that the three ways to fail to make an attribution to discrimination are distinct in that each resulted in unique consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 167–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bylsma, W. H., & Major, B. (1994). Social comparisons and contentment: Exploring the psychological costs of the gender wage gap. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. P., & Clark, M. P. (1939). Segregation as a factor in the racial identification of Negro pre-school children: A preliminary report. The Journal of Experimental Education, 8, 161–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. L., & Swim, J. K. (1995). The differential impact of gender ratios on women and men: Tokenism, self-confidence, and expectations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 876–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, L. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman, M. L., & Baron, R. S. (1996). Influence of prototypes on perceptions of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 727–739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, C., & Miller, C. (2001). Stop complaining!: The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, C. R., Vick, S. B., & Major, B. (2006). Prejudice expectations moderate preconscious attention to cues that are threatening to social identity. Psychological Science, 17, 332–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, A. J., Cronen, S., Chasteen, A. L., & Lickel, B. (1996). Private vs public expressions of racial prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 437–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 83–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 26 (pp. 293–348). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., & McCoy, S. K. (2003). It’s not my fault: When and why attributions to prejudice protect self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 772–781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 34 (pp. 251–330). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallett, R. K., & Swim, J. K. (2005). Bring it on: Proactive coping with discrimination. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 411–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti, M. W., Bobier, D. M., & Baron, R. S. (2000). Right before our eyes: The failure to recognize non-prototypical forms of prejudice. Group Process and Intergroup Relations, 3, 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinel, E. C. (1999). Sigma consciousness: The psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 114–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S., & Tesser, A. (1972). Fear of negative evaluation and the reluctance to transmit bad news. Journal of Communication, 22, 124–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Kobrynowicz, D., & Owen, S. (2002). Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sechrist, G. B., Swim, J. K., & Mark, M. (2003). Mood as information in making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 524–531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sechrist, G. B., Swim, J. K., & Stangor, C. (2004). When do the stigmatized make attributions to discrimination occurring to the self and others? The roles of self presentation and need for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 111–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., Salvatore, J., & Hill, D. M. (2006). Silence is not golden: The intrapersonal consequences of not confronting prejudice. In S. Levin, & C. van Laar (Eds.) Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 65–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stangor, C., Sechrist, G. B., & Swim, J. K. (1999). Sensitivity to sexism and perceptions of sexist events. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 58, 251–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stangor, C., Swim, J. K., Sechrist, G. B., DeCoster, J., Van Allen, K. L., & Ottenbreit, A. (2003). Ask, answer, and announce: Three stages in perceiving and responding to discrimination. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.) European review of social psychology (vol. 14, pp. 277–311). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stangor, C., Swim, J. K., Van Allen, K., & Sechrist, G. (2002). Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me—What did you just say?!: Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily dairy studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Scott, E. D., Sechrist, G. B., Campbell, B., & Stangor, C. (2003). The role of intent and harm in perceptions of prejudice and discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 944–959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Stangor, C., Sechrist, G. B., & DeCoster, J. (2002). Asking, answering, and announcing: The role of perceptions, private judgments, and social context on private and public reports of discrimination and prejudice. Paper presented at the symposium on “Psychological antecedents and consequences of perceiving prejudice,” at the annual meeting of the Society of Experimental Social Psychology in Columbus, Ohio.

  • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gretchen B. Sechrist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sechrist, G.B., Swim, J.K. Psychological Consequences of Failing to Attribute Negative Outcomes to Discrimination. Sex Roles 59, 21–38 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9429-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9429-z

Keywords

Navigation