The hypothesis that possessing multiple subordinate-group identities renders a person “invisible” relative to those with a single subordinate-group identity is developed. We propose that androcentric, ethnocentric, and heterocentric ideologies will cause people who have multiple subordinate-group identities to be defined as non-prototypical members of their respective identity groups. Because people with multiple subordinate-group identities (e.g., ethnic minority woman) do not fit the prototypes of their respective identity groups (e.g., ethnic minorities, women), they will experience what we have termed “intersectional invisibility.” In this article, our model of intersectional invisibility is developed and evidence from historical narratives, cultural representations, interest-group politics, and anti-discrimination legal frameworks is used to illustrate its utility. Implications for social psychological theory and research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Almquist, E. M. (1975). Untangling the effects of race and sex: The disadvantaged status of Black women. Social Science Quarterly, 56, 129–142.
Ayres, I., & Siegelman, P. (1995). Race and gender discrimination in negotiation for the purchase of a new car. American Economic Review, 85, 304–321.
Bayard Rustin (1910–1987). These are his birth and death years. the citation is from Carbado, which is at the end of the sentence. no change necessary here.
Beale, F. (1979). Double jeopardy: To be black and female. In T. Cade (Ed.), The Black Woman (pp. 90–100). New York: New American Library.
Bem, S. L. (1994). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Berdahl, J. L., & Moore, C. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 426–436.
Bérubé, A. (2001). How gay stays white and what kind of white it stays. In B. B. Rasmussen, E. Klinenberg, I. J. Nexica, & M. Wray (Eds.), The making and unmaking of whiteness (pp. 234–265). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Blair, I. V., Judd, C. M., Sadler, M. S., & Jenkins, C. (2002). The role of Afrocentric features in person perception: Judging by features and categories. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83, 5–25.
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2000). “This is a White Country”: The racial ideology of the Western nations of the world-system. Sociological Quarterly, 70, 188–214.
Bowleg, L., Huang, J., Brooks, K., Black, A., & Burkholder, G. (2003). Triple jeopardy and beyond: Multiple minority stress and resilience among Black lesbians. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 7, 87–108.
Browne, I., & Misra, J. (2003). The intersection of gender and race in the labor market. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 487–513.
Carbado, D. W. (2000a). Black rights, gay rights, civil rights. UCLA Law Review, 47, 1467–1519.
Carbado, D. W. (2000b). Race and sex in antidiscrimination law. In L. W. Levy, & K. L. Karst (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the American constitution (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Carbado, D. W. (2002). Race to the bottom. UCLA Law Review, 49, 1283–1313.
Carbado, D. W., & Weise, W. (2004). The Civil Rights identity of Bayard Rustin. Texas Law Review, 82, 1133–1195.
Chung, Y. B., & Katayama, M. (1998). Ethnic and sexual identity development of Asian- American lesbian and gay adolescents. Professional School Counseling, 1, 21–25.
Cohen, C. (1999). The boundaries of blackness: AIDS and the breakdown of black politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Collins, P. H. (1999). Moving beyond gender: Intersectionality and scientific knowledge. In M. F. Ferree (Ed.), Revisioning gender (pp. 261–284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cortina, L. (2001). Assessing sexual harassment among Latinas. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7, 164–181.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In K. Bartlett, & R. Kennedy (Eds.), Feminist legal theory: Readings in law and gender (pp. 57–80). San Francisco: Westview Press.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1992). Whose story is it anyway? Feminist and antiracist appropriations of Anita Hill. In T. Morrison (Ed.), Race-ing justice, en-gendering power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas and the construction of social reality (pp. 402–440). New York: Pantheon.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1995). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. In K. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, & K. Thomas (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 357–383). New York: New Press.
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648.
Davis, A. Y. (1981). Women, race, and class. New York: Random House.
DeGraffenreid v. Gen. Motors Assembly Div. (1976). 558 F.2d 480, 484.
D’Emilio, J. (2004). Lost prophet: The life and times of Bayard Rustin. New York: Free Press.
Denizet-Lewis, B. (2003). Double lives on the down low. New York Times Magazine (pp. 28–33), August 3.
Devos, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). American = white? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447–466.
Diamond, L. M. (2003a). Was it a phase? Young women’s relinquishment of lesbian/bisexual identities over a 5-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 352–364.
Diamond, L. M. (2003b). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110, 173–192.
Eagly, A. H., & Kite, M. E. (1987). Are stereotypes of nationalities applied to both women and men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 451–462.
Eberhardt, J. L., Davies, P. G., Purdie-Vaughns, V. J., & Johnson, S. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17, 383–386.
Eberhardt, J. L., Goff, P. A., Purdie, V. J., & Davies, P. G. (2004). Seeing black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 876–963.
Eibach, R. P., & Ehrlinger, J. (2006). Keep your eyes on the prize: Reference points and group differences in assessing progress towards equality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 66–77.
Eibach, R. P., & Keegan, T. (2006). Free at last? Social dominance, loss aversion, and white and black Americans’ differing assessments of progress towards racial equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 453–467.
Epstein, C. F. (1973). Black and female: The double whammy. Psychology Today, 89, 57–61.
Gonzales, P. M., Blanton, H., & Williams, K. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 659–670.
Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5, 63–79.
Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., Turner, J. C., & Onorato, R. S. (1995). Contextual changes in the prototypicality of extreme and moderate outgroup members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 509–530.
Hegarty, P., & Pratto, F. (2004). The differences that norms make: Empiricism, social constructionism and the interpretation of group differences. Sex Roles, 50, 445–453.
Hegarty, P., Pratto, F., & Lemieux, A. (2004). Heterocentric norms and heterosexist ambivalences: Drinking in intergroup discomfort. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 119–130.
Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200.
Hooks, b. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston: Sound End Press.
Jeffries, V., & Ransford, H. E. (1980). Social stratification: A multiple hierarchy approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
King, D. H. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a black feminist ideology. Signs, 14, 42–72.
King, M. (1975). Oppression and power: The unique status of Blackwomen in the American political system. Social Science Quarterly, 56, 117–128.
Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. R. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 22, 336–353.
Landrine, H., Klonoff, E. A., Alcaraz, R., Scott, J., & Wilkins, P. (1995). Multiple variables in discrimination. In B. Lott & D. Maluso (Eds.), The social psychology of interpersonal discrimination (pp. 183–224). New York: Guilford Press.
Levin, S., Sinclair, S., Veniegas, R. C., & Taylor, P. L. (2002). Perceived discrimination in the context of multiple group memberships. Psychological Science, 13, 557–560.
Lien, P. (1994). Ethnicity and political participation: A comparison between Asian and Mexican Americans. Political Behavior, 16(2), 237–264.
Maddox, K. B. (2004). Perspectives on racial phenotypicality bias. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 383–401.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.
McLeod, J. D., & Owens, T. J. (2004). Psychological well-being in the early life course: Variations by socioeconomic status, gender, and race/ethnicity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 275–278.
Miller, D. T., Taylor, B., & Buck, M. L. (1991). Gender gaps: Who needs to be explained? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 5–12.
Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, A. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158–174.
Patterson, O. (1995). The crisis of gender relations among African-Americans. In A. Hill & E. C. Coleman (Eds.), Race, gender, and power in America: The legacy of the Hill-Thomas Hearings (pp. 56–104). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ransford, H. E., & Miller, J. (1983). Race, sex, and feminist outlooks. American Sociological Review, 48, 46–59.
Reid, P. T. (1984). Feminism versus minority group identity: Not for Black women only. Sex Roles, 10, 247–255.
Reid, P. T., & Comas-Diaz, L. (1990). Gender and ethnicity: Perspectives on dual status. Sex Roles, 22, 397–408.
Salgado de Synder, N. V., Cervantes, R. C., & Padilla, A. M. (1990). Gender and ethnic differences in psychosocial stress and generalized distress among Hispanics. Sex Roles, 22, 441–453.
Settles, I. H. (2006). Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles, 54, 589–601.
Sidanius, J., & Kurzban, R. (2003). Evolutionary approaches to political psychology. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 146–181). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sidanius, J., & Veniegas, R. C. (2000). Gender and race discrimination: The interactive nature of disadvantage. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 47–69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Simmons, R. G., Black, A., & Zhou, Y. (1991). African-American versus White children and the transition into junior high school. American Journal of Education, 99, 481–520.
Sims-Wood, J. (1988). The black female: Mammy, Jemima, Sapphire, and other images. In J. Smith (Ed.), Images of blacks in American culture (pp. 235–256). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Smith, A., & Stewart, A. J. (1983). Approaches to studying racism and sexism in black women’s lives. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 1–15.
Strolovitch, D. Z. (2007). Affirmative advocacy: Race, class, and gender in interest group politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sue, S. (1999). Science, ethnicity, and bias: Where have we gone wrong? American Psychologist, 54, 1070–7077.
Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways: A study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, more, and morals. Boston, MA: Ginn & Co.
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Witt, S. H. (1981). Past perspectives and present problems. In Ohoyo Resource Center Staff (Ed.), Words of today’s American Indian women: Ohoyo Makachi (pp. 11–20). Wichita Falls, TX: Ohoya, Inc.
Woodzicka, J. A., & LaFrance, M. (2001). Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 15–30.
We extend thanks to Jack Dovidio, Steven Mock, Ruth Ditlmann, and Anna Christina Lopez for their valuable comments on drafts of this article.
About this article
Cite this article
Purdie-Vaughns, V., Eibach, R.P. Intersectional Invisibility: The Distinctive Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple Subordinate-Group Identities. Sex Roles 59, 377–391 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
- Sexual orientation
- Multiple identities
- Double jeopardy
- Social dominance theory