Sex Roles

, Volume 59, Issue 5–6, pp 312–325 | Cite as

When Black + Lesbian + Woman ≠ Black Lesbian Woman: The Methodological Challenges of Qualitative and Quantitative Intersectionality Research

  • Lisa BowlegEmail author
Original Article


The notion that social identities and social inequality based on ethnicity, sexual orientation, and sex/gender are intersectional rather than additive poses a variety of thorny methodological challenges. Using research with Black lesbians (Bowleg, manuscripts in preparation; Bowleg et al., Journal of Lesbian Studies, 2008; Bowleg et al., Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology 10:229–240, 2004; Bowleg et al., Journal of Lesbian Studies, 7:87–108, 2003) as a foundation, I examine how these challenges shape measurement, analysis, and interpretation. I argue that a key dilemma for intersectionality researchers is that the additive (e.g., Black + Lesbian + Woman) versus intersectional (e.g., Black Lesbian Woman) assumption inherent in measurement and qualitative and quantitative data analyses contradicts the central tenet of intersectionality: social identities and inequality are interdependent for groups such as Black lesbians, not mutually exclusive. In light of this, interpretation becomes one of the most substantial tools in the intersectionality researcher’s methodological toolbox.


Intersectionality research methods Black lesbians 



To my friend, colleague, and statistical guru Torsten B. Neilands, Ph.D., Assistant Professor and Director of the Methods Core at the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, I offer my immense gratitude for his thoughtful comments about the implications of intersectionality for quantitative research. My sincere thanks also extend to Judith Agyeman, my wonderful graduate research assistant at the School of Public Health who assisted with fact checking and literature reviews for this article. Last, but by no means least, I express my gratitude to the participants of the BLSR and TT study, without whom none of this research would be possible.


  1. Baptiste, I. (2001). Qualitative data analysis: Common phases, strategic differences [Electronic Version]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(3). Retrieved 2 Sep 2007.
  2. Beale, F. (1970). Double jeopardy: To be black and female. In T. Cade (Ed.) The Black woman (pp. 90–100). New York: Signet.Google Scholar
  3. Betancourt, H., & Lopez, S. R. (1993). The study of culture, ethnicity, and race in American psychology. American Psychologist, 48, 629–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binion, V. J. (1990). Psychological androgyny: A Black female perspective. Sex Roles, 22, 487–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowleg, L., Brooks, K., & Ritz, S. F. (2008). “Bringing home more than a paycheck”: An exploratory analysis of Black lesbians’ experiences of stress and coping in the workplace. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 12(1), 69–84.Google Scholar
  6. Bowleg, L., Craig, M. L., & Burkholder, G. (2004). Rising and surviving: A conceptual model of active coping among Black lesbians. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 10, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowleg, L., Huang, J., Brooks, K., Black, A., & Burkholder, G. (2003). Triple jeopardy and beyond: Multiple minority stress and resilience among Black lesbians. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 7, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradburn, N. M., Sudman, S., & Wansink, B. (2004). Asking questions: The definitive guide to questionnaire design—for market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Brooks, V. R. (1981). Minority stress and lesbian women. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  10. Cochran, S. D., & Mays, V. M. (1988). Disclosure of sexual preference to physicians by Black lesbian and bisexual women. Western Journal of Medicine, 149, 616–619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cochran, S. D., & Mays, V. M. (1994). Depressive distress among homosexually active African American men and women. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 524–529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Collins, P. H. (1995). Symposium: On West and Fenstermaker’s “Doing difference”. Gender & Society, 9, 491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins, P. H. (1998). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia, 13, 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139, 139–167.Google Scholar
  16. Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crosby, F., Cordova, D. I., & Jaskar, K. (1993). On the failure to see oneself as disadvantaged: Cognitive and emotional components. In M. Hogg, & D. Abrams (Eds.) Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 87–104). Hertfordshire, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  19. Cuadraz, G. H., & Uttal, L. (1999). Intersectionality and in-depth interviews: Methodological strategies for analyzing race, class, and gender. Race, Gender & Class, 6, 156–186.Google Scholar
  20. Dang, A., & Frazer, S. (2004). Black same-sex households in the United States: A report from the 2000 Census. Retrieved 9 Dec 2005.
  21. Davis, A. Y. (1983). Women, race and class (1st Ed.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  22. Dean, L., Meyer, I. H., Robinson, K., Sell, R. L., Sember, R., Silenzio, V. M. B., et al. (2000). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health: Findings and concerns. Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, 4, 102–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deaux, K. (1993). Reconstructing social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DiPlacido, J. (1998). Minority stress among lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals: A consequence of heterosexism, homophobia, and stigmatization. In G. M. Herek (Ed.) Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (pp. 138–159). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (2nd Ed. pp. 107–131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Fingerhut, A. W., Peplau, L. A., & Ghavami, N. (2005). A dual-identity framework for understanding lesbian experience. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greene, B. (1995). Lesbian women of color: Triple jeopardy. In L. Comas-Diaz, & B. Greene (Eds.) Women of color: Integrating ethnic and gender identities in psychotherapy (pp. 389–427). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  28. Greene, B. (Ed.). (1997). Ethnic and cultural diversity among lesbians and gay men. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Hall, R. L., & Greene, B. (2002). Not any one thing: The complex legacy of social class on African American lesbian relationships. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M., & Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: A methodological perspective. American Psychologist, 60, 27–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hooks, B. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston, MA: South End.Google Scholar
  32. Hull, G. T., Bell Scott, P., & Smith, B. (Eds.). (1982). But some of us are brave: All the women are White, all the Blacks are men: Black Women’s Studies. Old Westbury, NY: Feminist.Google Scholar
  33. Jones, C., & Shorter-Gooden, K. (2003). Shifting: The double lives of Black women in America. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  34. Krieger, N. (1999). Embodying inequality: A review of concepts, measures, and methods for studying health consequences of discrimination. International Journal of Health Services, 29, 295–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krieger, N., Rowley, D. L., Herman, A. A., Avery, B., & Phillips, M. T. (1993). Racism, sexism, and social class: Implications for studies of health, disease, and well-being. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 9, 82–122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Landrine, H., Klonoff, E. A., Alcaraz, R., Scott, J., & Wilkins, P. (1995). Multiple variables in discrimination. In B. Lott, & D. Maluso (Eds.) The social psychology of interpersonal discrimination (pp. 183–224). NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  37. Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing.Google Scholar
  38. Marecek, J. (2003). Dancing through minefields: Toward a qualitative stance in psychology. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.) Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 49–69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mays, V. M., & Cochran, S. D. (1988). The Black women’s relationship project: A national survey of Black lesbians. In M. Shernoff, & W. Scott (Eds.) The sourcebook on lesbian/gay health care (2nd Ed. pp. 54–62). Washington, DC: The National Lesbian/Gay Health Foundation.Google Scholar
  40. Mays, V. M., Yancey, A. K., Cochran, S. D., Weber, M., & Fielding, J. E. (2002). Heterogeneity of health disparities among African American, Hispanic, and Asian American women: Unrecognized influences of sexual orientation. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 632–639.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McGrath, J. E., & Johnson, B. A. (2003). Methodology makes meaning: How both qualitative and quantitative paradigms shape evidence and its interpretation. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.) Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 31–48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. (2005). States, cities and counties with civil rights ordinances, policies or proclamations prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation (Current through July 2005). Retrieved 9 Dec 2005
  45. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative interviewing. In Qualitative research and evaluation methods 3rd ed (pp. 339–427). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Peplau, L. A., Cochran, S. D., & Mays, V. M. (1997). A national survey of the intimate relationships of African American lesbians and gay men: A look at commitment, satisfaction, sexual behavior, and HIV disease. In B. Greene (Ed.) Ethnic and cultural diversity among lesbians and gay men (pp. 11–38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Ransford, H. E. (1980). The prediction of social behavior and attitudes. In V. Jeffries, & H. Ransford (Eds.) Social stratification: A multiple hierarchy approach (pp. 265–295). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  48. Reid, P. T., & Comas-Diaz, L. (1990). Gender and ethnicity: Perspectives on dual status. Sex Roles, 22, 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schulman, K. A., Berlin, J. A., Harless, W., Kerner, J. F., Sistrunk, S., Gersh, B. J., et al. (1999). The effect of race and sex on physicians’ recommendations for cardiac catheterization. New England Journal of Medicine, 340, 618–626.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sell, R. L., & Becker, J. B. (2001). Sexual orientation data collection and progress toward Healthy People 2010. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 876–882.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smedley, B. D., Stith, A. Y., & Nelson, A. R. (Eds.). (2003). Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies.Google Scholar
  52. Spelman, E. V. (1998). Gender and race: The ampersand problem in feminist thought. In S. Ruth (Ed.) Issues in feminism: An introduction to Women’s studies 4th ed (pp. 22–34). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  53. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Sue, D. W., Bingham, R. P., Porche Burke, L., & Vasquez, M. (1999). The diversification of psychology: A multicultural revolution. American Psychologist, 54, 1061–1069.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Introduction to mixed method and mixed model studies in the social and behavioral sciences: Paradigm wars and mixed methodologies. In Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 3–19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Truth, S. (1851). Ain’t I a woman? [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 15 Jan 2007.
  57. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy People 2010 (No. 017-001-00547-9). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  58. Weber, L. (1998). A conceptual framework for understanding race, class, gender, and sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weber, L., & Parra-Medina, D. (2003). Intersectionality and women’s health: Charting a path to eliminating health disparities. Advances in Gender Research, 7, 181–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Community Health and Prevention Program, School of Public HealthDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations