Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 57, Issue 3–4, pp 223–234 | Cite as

Do Feminist Women Feel Better About their Lives? Examining Patterns of Feminist Identity Development and Women’s Subjective Well-being

  • Oksana Yakushko
Original Article

Abstract

Relations between women’s patterns of feminist identity development and their subjective well-being were explored through an online study with a sample of 691 women ages 18 to 83 from across the United States. The results of a hierarchical cluster analysis indicated that women fall into three groups based on their feminist identity development processes: Women with Traditional Values, Women with Moderate Values, and Women with Feminist Values. The results of the analysis of covariance showed that women who held feminist and moderate values scored significantly higher on a measure of overall well-being—particularly on subscales measuring purpose in life, autonomy, and personal growth—than women with traditional values.

Keywords

Feminism Well-being Identity Age Women Cluster analysis 

References

  1. Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bellafante, G. (1998 June 29). Feminism: It’s all about me! Time, 151.Google Scholar
  3. Borgen, F. H., & Barnett, D. C. (1987). Applying cluster analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 456–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cross, W. E., Jr. (1971). The Negro-to-Black conversion experience. Black World, 20, 13–27.Google Scholar
  6. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dionne, M., Davis, C., Fox, J., & Gurevich, M. (1995). Feminist ideology as a predictor of body dissatisfaction in women. Sex Roles, 33, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Downing, N. E., & Roush, K. L. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity for women. The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 695–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dusky, L. (2003). Ms. Poll: Feminist Tide Sweeps in as the 21st Century Begins. Ms. Magazine, 7–13, Spring.Google Scholar
  12. Fischer, A. R., & Good, G. E. (1994). Gender, self, and the others: Perceptions of the campus environment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischer, A. R., & Good, G. E. (2004). Women’s feminist consciousness, anger, and psychological distress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 437–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D. M., Mergl, M. M., Good, G. E., Hill, M. S., & Blum, S. A. (2000). Assessing women’s feminist identity development: Studies of convergent, discriminant, and structural validity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Granello, D. H., & Wheaton, J. E. (2004). Online data collection: Strategies for research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82, 387–393.Google Scholar
  18. Hair, J. F., & Black, W. C. (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 147–206). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  19. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Hansen, N. D. (2002). Reflections on feminist identity development. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haring, M. J., Stock, W. A., & Okun, M. A. (1984). A research synthesis of gender and social class as correlates of subjective well-being. Human Relations, 37, 645–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henderson-King, D. H., & Stewart, A. J. (1994). Women or feminist? Assessing women’s group consciousness. Sex Roles, 31, 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henderson-King, D. H., & Stewart, A. J. (1997). Feminist consciousness: Perspectives on women’s experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoff-Sommers, C. (1995). Who stole feminism? How women have betrayed women. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  25. hooks, B. (2000). Feminist theory: From margins to center. Boston: South End.Google Scholar
  26. Hunter, A. G., & Sellers, S. L. (1998). Feminist attitudes among African American women and men. Gender and Society, 12, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hyde, J. S. (2002). Feminist identity development: The current state of theory, research, and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology. Signs, 14, 42–72.Google Scholar
  29. Klonis, S., Endo, J., Crosby, F., & Worrell, J. (1997). Feminism as life raft. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lengua, L. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2000). Gender, gender roles and personality: Gender differences in the prediction of coping and psychological symptoms. Sex Roles, 43, 787–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liss, M., O’Connor, S., Morosky, E., & Crawford, M. (2001). What makes a feminist? Predictors and correlates of feminist social identity in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitchell, J., & Oakley, A. (Eds.), (1997). Who’s afraid of feminism?: Seeing through the backlash. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  34. Moradi, B., & Subich, L. M. (2002a). Comparing the psychometrics of three instruments. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moradi, B., & Subich, L. M. (2002b). Perceived sexist events and feminist identity development attitudes: Links to women’s psychological distress. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 44–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moradi, B., Subich, L. M., & Phillips, J. C. (2002). Revisiting feminist identity development theory, research, and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 6–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Myaskovsky, L., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). Predictors of feminist social identity among college women. Sex Roles, 37, 861–883.Google Scholar
  38. Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Newton, E. (2000). Margaret Mead made me gay: Personal essays, public ideas. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Ng, S. H., Dunne, M., & Cataldo, M. (1995). Feminist identities and preferred strategies for advancing women’s positive self-concept. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 561–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Rusting, C. L. (1999). Gender differences in well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 330–350). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Noor, N. M. (1996). Some demographic, personality, and role variables as correlates of women’s well-being. Sex Roles, 34, 603–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Offen, K. (1988). Defining feminism: A comparative historical approach. Signs, 14, 152.Google Scholar
  44. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reid, P. T. (1984). Feminism versus minority group identity: Not for Black woman only. Sex Roles, 10, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reingold, B., & Foust, H. (1998). Exploring the determinants of feminist consciousness in the United States. Women and politics, 19, 19–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rich, A. (1982). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian experience. Reprinted in H. Abelove, M. A. Barale & D. M. Halperin. (Eds.). (1993). The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 227–254). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Rickard, K. M. (1990). The effect of feminist identity level on gender prejudice toward artists’ illustration. Journal of Research on Personality, 24, 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robbins, S. B., & Kliewer, W. L. (2000). Advances in theory and research on subjective well-being. In S. D. Brown & Lent R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd ed., pp. 310–345). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  50. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1996). Psychological well-being: Meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 65, 14–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ryff, C. D., Lee, Y. H., Essex, M. J., & Schmutte, P. S. (1994). My children and me: Midlife evaluations of grown children and of self. Psychology and Aging, 9, 195–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saunders, K. J., & Kashubeck-West, S. (2006). The relations among feminist identity development, gender-role orientation, and psychological well-being in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simoni, J. M., Henley, N. M., & Christie, C. J. (1999). A Lesbian Feminist subscale for the Feminist Perspectives Scale. Sex Roles, 41, 833–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Snyder, R., & Hasbrouck, L. (1996). Feminist identity, gender traits, and symptoms of disturbed eating among college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 593–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Tiggemann, M., & Stevens, C. (1999). Weight concern across the life-span: Relationship to self-esteem and feminist identity. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 26, 103–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vandiver, B. J. (2002). What do we know and where do we go? The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vaughn, L. M., Lansky, L. M., & Rawlings, E. I. (1997). Women’s sexual arousal and affect: The effect of feminist identification and male dominant versus female dominant sexual scenarios. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 5, 169–183.Google Scholar
  62. Walters, M. (2005). Feminism: A very short introduction. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Walsh, W. B., & Heppner, M. J. (Eds.), (2006). Handbook of career counseling for women. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  64. Weitz, R. (1982). Feminist consciousness raising, self-concept, and depression. Sex Roles, 8, 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Williams, R., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but...”: Factors contributing to discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37, 885–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wolf, N. (1994). Fire with fire: The new feminine power and how to use it. San Francisco: Fawcett.Google Scholar
  67. Wood, W., Rhodes, N., & Whelan, M. (1989). Sex differences in positive well-being: A consideration of emotional style and marital status. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Nebraska—LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations