Abstract
What roles do ethnicity, gender, and attitudes play in determining whether a person will be perceived as a unique individual versus a homogenized group member? Attitudes toward women’s roles have been found to predict Whites’ relative individuation of women and men; however, African Americans were found to individuate women and men equally, regardless of attitude (Stewart et al. 2000). Using a name–trait matching paradigm, the present research found that when targets were identified as African American, African American participants’ (18 male and 35 female college students) attitudes toward women’s roles predicted their individuation of men and women. These results suggest that an ethnic out-group homogeneity effect, rather than gender-egalitarian attitudes, contributed to the previous finding of equivalent individuation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartsch, R. A., Judd, C. M., Louw, D. A., Park, B., & Ryan, C. S. (1997). Cross-national outgroup homogeneity: United States and South African stereotypes. South African Journal of Psychology, 27, 166–170.
Bielby, D. D., & Bielby, W. T. (1984). Work commitment, sex-role attitudes, and women’s employment. American Sociological Review, 49, 234–247.
Blee, K. M., & Tickamyer, A. R. (1995). Racial differences in men’s attitudes about women’s gender roles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 1173–1182.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
de la Haye, A. (2001). False consensus and the Outgroup Homogeneity Effect: Interference in measurement or intrinsically dependent processes? European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 217–230.
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotypes. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628.
Gawronski, B., Ehrenberg, K., Banse, R., Zukova, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). It’s in the mind of the beholder: The impact of stereotypic associations on category-based and individuating impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 16–30.
Guinote, A. (2004). Group size, outcome dependency, and power: Effects on perceived and objective group variability. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 221–236). New York: Psychology.
Haslam, S. A., & Oakes, P. J. (1995). How context-independent is the outgroup homogeneity effect? A response to Bartsch and Judd. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 469–475.
Kane, E. W. (1992). Race, gender, and attitudes toward gender stratification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 311–320.
Kane, E. W. (2000). Racial and ethnic variations in gender-related attitudes. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 419–439.
Kasof, J. (1993). Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 140–163.
Klauer, K. C., & Wegener, I. (1998). Unraveling social categorization in the “Who said what?” paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1155–1178.
Kluegal J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. New York: Aldine.
Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Eagly, A. H., & Stewart, T. L., (1995). Homogeneity of gender groups in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 193–217.
Neve, R. J. M. (1995). Changes in attitudes toward women’s emancipation in the Netherlands over two decades: Unraveling a trend. Social Science Research, 24, 167–187.
Ostrom, T. M., & Sedikides, C. (1992). Outgroup homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 536–552.
Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051–1068.
Ransford, H. E., & Miller, J. (1983). Race, sex, and feminist outlooks. American Sociological Review, 48, 46–59.
Simon, B., & Mummendey, A. (1990). Perceptions of relative group size and group homogeneity: We are the majority and they are all the same. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 351–356.
Spence, J. T., & Hahn, E. D. (1997). The attitudes toward women scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 17–34.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Stewart, T. L., & Denney, H. T. (2005). Perceived typicality of assorted traits for African American and White men and women. Unpublished data.
Stewart, T. L., Harris, K. R., van Knippenberg, A., Hermsen, B. J., Joly, J., & Lippmann, M. W. (2006). The effect of attitude toward women on the relative individuation of women and men is mediated by perceived gender subgroups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 759–775.
Stewart, T. L., van Knippenberg, A., Joly, J., Lippmann, M. W., Hermsen, B. J., & Harris, K. R. (2004). The influence of attitudes toward women on the relative individuation of women and men in the Netherlands. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 240–245.
Stewart, T. L., & Vassar, P. M. (2000). The effect of occupational status cues on memory for male and female targets. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 161–169.
Stewart, T. L., Vassar, P. M., Sanchez, D. T., & David, S. E. (2000). Attitude toward women’s societal roles moderates the effect of gender cues on target individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 143–157.
Swim, J., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D. G. (1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 409–429.
Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. L., & Ruderman, A. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778–793.
Wilke, J. (1993). Changes in U.W. men’s attitudes toward the family provider role, 1972–1989. Gender and Society, 7, 261–279.
Zarate, M. A., & Smith, E. R. (1990). Person categorization and stereotyping. Social Cognition, 8, 161–185.
Acknowledgement
We thank Fabian Novello, Brian Tanner, Veronica Smith, and Jamie DeCoster for helpful comments on a previous draft of this manuscript. Byron Robinson is thanked for statistical consultation. We would also like to express our appreciation to Blake Weems, Stacey Necaise Hansen, Kevin Harris, Vicki Robinson, Michelle Young, Nia Phillips, Danielle Lindley, Jessica Featherston, and Michael Triplett for their many contributions to this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stewart, T.L., Jaspers, K.E., Estes, S.B. et al. Interethnic Differences (or Similarities?) in the Relative Individuation of Women and Men. Sex Roles 57, 21–29 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9224-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9224-2