Gender Differences in Impression Management in Organizations: A Qualitative Review

Abstract

In this article we review the literature on impression management to determine if there are substantial gender differences in the employment of impression management tactics in organizational contexts. Based on a social roles theory perspective (Eagly, 1987), we examined use of impression management tactics in organizational settings for gender differences in behavior. We expected that men and women would generally report using impression management tactics consistent with gender role expectations and that this might not be advantageous to women in the corporate world. Our review of the literature supported our expectations. We conclude with implications of these findings for an enriched understanding of organizational behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    To clarify, the vast majority of the research reported in this review was specifically conducted with corporate workers. However, a small minority of the research was conducted with college students. The results are consistent across context, and, because the focus of the review is on what happens in the workplace, we do not qualify some of our general statements about the work generalizing beyond the organization.

References

  1. Arkin, R. M., & Shepperd, J. A. (1989). Self-presentation styles in organizations. In R. A. Giacalone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression management in the organization (pp. 125–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arkin, R. M., & Shepperd, J. A. (1990). Strategic self-presentation: An overview. In M. J. Cody & M. L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The psychology of tactical communication (pp. 175–193). Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ashford, S. N., Rothbard, S., Piderit, S. K., & Dutton, J. (1998). Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 23–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. (1978). Interpersonal attraction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bohra, K. A., & Pandey, J. (1984). Ingratiation toward strangers, friends, and bosses. Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 217–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2003a). More than one way to make an impression: Exploring profiles of impression management. Journal of Management, 29, 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2003b). Counternormative impression management, likeability, and performance ratings: The use of intimidation in an organizational setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brush, C., & Hisrich, R. (1986). The woman entrepreneur: Starting, financing, and managing a successful new business. Boston: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carli, L. L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 941–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cialdini, R. B. (1989). Indirect tactics of image management: Beyond basking. In R. A. Giacalone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression management in the organization (pp. 45–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cialdini, R. B., Bator, R. J., & Guadagno, R. E. (1999). Normative influences in organizations. In L. Thompson, D. Messick, & J. Levine (Eds.), Shared cognitions in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 195–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R., Thorne, A., Walker, M., Freeman, S., & Sloane, L. T. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 463–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cialdini, R. B., Finch, J. F., & DeNicholas, M. E. (1990). Strategic self-presentation: The indirect route. In M. J. Cody & M. L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The psychology of tactical communication (pp. 194–206). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Colwill, N. L. (1993). Women in management: Power and powerlessness. In B. C. Long & S. E. Khan (Eds.), Women, work, and coping: A multidisciplinary approach to workplace stress (pp. 73–89). Montreal-Kingston, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deaux, K. (1985). Sex and gender. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 49–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Department of Labor Women’s Bureau. (2005). Women in the labor force in 2004. Retrieved 2005 from the U. S. Department of Labor via http://www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/Qf-laborforce-04.htm.

  21. DePaulo, P. J. (1992). Applications of nonverbal behavior research in marketing and management. In R. S. Feldman (Ed.), Applications of nonverbal behavioral theories and research (pp. 63–87). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dietrich, D. (1995). Gender differences in self-handicapping: Regardless of academic or social competence implications. Social Behavior and Personality, 23, 403–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dreher, G. F., Dougherty, T. W., & Whitely, W. (1989). Influence tactics and salary attainment: A gender-specific analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 535–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. DuBrin, A. J. (1989). Sex differences in endorsement of influence tactics and political behavior tendencies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. DuBrin, A. J. (1991). Sex and gender differences in tactics of influence. Psychological Reports, 68, 635–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. DuBrin, A. J. (1994). Sex differences in the use and effectiveness of tactics of impression management. Psychological Reports, 74(2), 531–544.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but ...: A meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569–591.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Federal Glass Ceiling Commission (1995). Good for business: Making full use of the nation’s human capital. Retrieved 1999 from the U. S. Department of Labor via http://www.dol.gov.

  32. Floge, L., & Merrill, D. M. (1986). Tokenism reconsidered: Male nurses and female physicians in a hospital setting. Social Forces, 64, 925–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Foschi, M., Lai, L., & Sigerson, K. (1994). Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 326–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fussell, P. (1983). Class. New York: Ballentine.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gardner, W. L., III, & Martinko, M. J. (1998). An organizational perspective of the effects of dysfunctional impression management. In A. O’Leary-Kelly & J. M. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behaviors in organizations (pp. 69–125). Stamford, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Giacalone, R. A., & Riordan, C. A. (1990). Effect of self-presentation on perceptions and recognition in an organization. Journal of Psychology, 124, 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gibson, B., & Sachau, D. (2000). Sandbagging as a self-presentation strategy: Claiming to be less than you are. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 56–70.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gordon, R. A. (1996). Impact of ingratiation on judgments and evaluations: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness (25th anniversary ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Paulist.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gutek, B. A., & Morasch, B. (1982). Sex-ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. Journal of Social Issues, 38(4), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Heatherington, L., Burns, A. B., & Gustafson, T. B. (1998). When another stumbles: Gender and self-presentation to vulnerable others. Sex Roles, 38, 889–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269–298.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Heilman, M. E., & Martell, R. F. (1986). Exposure to successful women: Antidote to sex discrimination in applicant screening decisions? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 376–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hendricks, M., & Brickman, P. (1974). Effects of status and knowledgability of audience on self-presentation. Sociometry, 37, 440–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Higgins, R. L., & Snyder, C. R. (1989). The business of excuses. In R. A. Giacalone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression management in the organization (pp. 73–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hirt, E. R., McCrea, S. M., & Kimble, C. E. (2000). Public self-focus and sex differences in behavioral self-handicapping: Does increasing self-threat still make it “just a man’s game?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1131–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hultin, M. (2003). Some take the glass escalator, some hit the glass ceiling? Work and Occupations, 30, 30–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jones, E. E., Gergen, K. J., & Jones, R. G. (1963). Tactics of ingratiation among leaders of subordinates in a status hierarchy. Psychological Monographs, 77, (3, Whole no. 566).

  51. Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. 231–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jones, E. E., & Wortman, C. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. New York: General Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kacmar, M. K., & Carlson, D. S. (1999). Effectiveness of impression management tactics across human resource situations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1293–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Karsten, M. F. (1994). Management and gender: Issues and attitudes. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. (1988). Upward-influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluations, salary, and stress. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 528–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Konovsky, M. A., & Jaster, F. (1989). “Blaming the victim” and other ways business men and women account for questionable behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Larwood, L. (1991). Start with a rational group of people...: Gender effects of impression management in organizations. In R. A. Giacalone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Applied impression management: How image-making affects managerial decisions (pp. 177–194). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Leary, M. R. (1995). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review of the two component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lee, S. J., Quigley, B. M., Nesler, M. S., Corbett, A. B., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1999). Development of a self-presentation tactics scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 701–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. MacDonald, E., & Schoenberger, C. R. (2006, September). The world’s most powerful women. Retrieved September 8, 2006 from http://www.forbes.com/lists/2006/11/06women_The-100-Most-Powerful-Women_land.html.

  62. Martin, J., & Meyerson, D. (1998). Women and power: Conformity, resistance, and disorganized coaction. In R. M. Kramer & M. A. Neale (Eds.), Power and influence in organizations (pp. 311–348). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Mast, M. S., & Hall, J. A. (2004). Who is the boss and who is not? Accuracy of judging status. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Mills, A. J. (2002). Studying the gendering of organizational culture over time: Concerns, issues and strategies. Gender, Work and Organization, 9, 286–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Neuberg, S. L., & Fiske, S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431–444.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Offermann, L. R., & Schrier, P. E. (1985). Social influence strategies: The impact of sex, role, and attitudes toward power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 286–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Price, R. V., & Bouffard, D. L. (1974). Behavioral appropriateness and situational constraint as dimensions of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 579–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rosenfeld, P., Edwards, J. E., & Thomas, M. D. (2005). Impression management. In N. Nicholson, P. G. Audia, & M. Pillutla (Eds.), Blackwell encyclopedia of management (2nd ed., pp. 163–165). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R. A., & Riordan, C. A. (1995). Impression management in organizations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ruble, D. N., & Higgins, E. T. (1976). Effects of group sex composition on self-presentation and sex-typing. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629–645.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relationships. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Schoenbach, P. (1986). A theory of conflict escalation in account episodes. [Report for the working unit.] Bochum, Germany: Ruhr-Universitat.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Schoenbach, P. (1990). Account episodes: The management or escalation of conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Schoenbach, P., & Kleibaumhueter, P. (1990). Severity of reproach and defensiveness of accounts. In M. J. Cody & M. L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The psychology of tactical communication (pp. 229–243). Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Schutte, N. S., Kenrick, D. T., & Sadalla, E. K. (1985). The search for predictable settings: Situational prototypes, constraint, and behavioral variation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Segal, A. T. (1992, June 8). Corporate women. Business Week, pp.74–83.

  80. Shepperd, J. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1989). Self-handicapping: The moderating roles of public self-consciousness and task importance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 252–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Smith, S. W., Cody, M. J., Lovette, S., & Candry, D. J. (1990). Self-monitoring, gender, and compliance-gaining goals. In M. J. Cody & M. L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The psychology of tactical communication (pp. 91–135). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Stokes, J., Riger, S., & Sullivan, M. (1995). Measuring perceptions of the working environment for women in corporate settings. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Strober, M. (1982). The MBA: Same passport to success for women and men? In P. Wallace (Ed.), Women in the workplace (pp. 25–55). Boston: Auburn House.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Stroh, L. K., Brett, J. M., & Reilly, A. H. (1992). All the right stuff: A comparison of female and male managers’ career progression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Strutton, D., Pelton, L. E., & Lumpkin, J. R. (1995). Sex differences in ingratiatory behavior: An investigation of influence tactics in the salesperson-customer dyad. Journal of Business Research, 34, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5: How womens and mens conversational styles affect who gets heard, who gets credit, and what gets done at work. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Tata, J. (2000). Implicit theories of account-giving: Influence of culture and gender. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 237–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Tedeschi, J. T. (1990). Self-presentation and social influence: An interactionist perspective. In M. J. Cody & M. L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The psychology of tactical communication (pp. 301–323). Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Tepper, B. J., Brown, S. J., & Hunt, M. D. (1993). Strength of subordinates’ upward influence tactics and gender congruency effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1903–1919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Thacker, R. A. (1995). Gender, influence tactics, and job characteristics preferences: New insights into salary determination. Sex Roles, 32, 617–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Tosi, H. L., & Einbender, S. W. (1985). The effects of the type and amount of information in sex discrimination research: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 712–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. U. S. Census Bureau. (2004). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2004. Retrieved 2005 from the U. S. Census Bureau via http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p60-229.pdf.

  93. Van Nostrand, C. H. (1993). Gender responsible leadership. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Wosinska, W., Dabul, A. J., Dion, R. W., & Cialdini, R. B. (1996). Self-presentational responses to success in the organization: The costs and benefits of modesty. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18(2), 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Wylie-Propersi, K. M. (2000). Choosing to leave corporations for self-employment: Midlife management women accepting the scepter of personal empowerment. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(2-A).

  96. Yoder, J. D., & Schleicher, T. L. (1996). Undergraduates regard deviation from occupational gender stereotypes as costly for women. Sex Roles, 34, 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Zivnuska, S., Kacmar, M. K., Witt, L. A., Carlson, D. S., & Bratton, V. K. (2001). Interactive effects of impression management and organizational politics on job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 627–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosanna E. Guadagno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guadagno, R.E., Cialdini, R.B. Gender Differences in Impression Management in Organizations: A Qualitative Review. Sex Roles 56, 483–494 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9187-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Impression management
  • Self-presentation
  • Social roles
  • Gender roles
  • Gender differences
  • Organizational behavior