Sex Roles

, 54:275

Alternating Between Masculine and Feminine Pronouns: Does Essay Topic Affect Readers' Perceptions?

Article

Abstract

Authors are routinely advised to avoid using masculine pronouns to refer to both men and women. Some style guides recommend alternating between masculine and feminine pronouns instead. Unfortunately, previous research with gender-neutral text indicates that readers perceive alternating pronouns to be biased in favor of women. We tested readers' perceptions of alternating pronouns in an essay on a traditionally feminine topic, on a traditionally masculine topic, and on a gender-neutral topic. There were four versions of each essay. One version alternated between masculine and feminine pronouns, a second version used paired masculine and feminine pronouns throughout the passage (e.g., ‘he or she’), and the remaining two versions used exclusively masculine pronouns or feminine pronouns. Readers overestimated the frequency of feminine pronouns in alternating text except when they occurred in an essay on a traditionally feminine topic. Readers also thought alternating pronouns were gender-biased and low in overall quality.

Keywords

sexist language alternating pronouns generic masculine pronouns 

REFERENCES

  1. Addison Wesley Longman. (1998). Author's guide. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  2. American Medical Association. (1998). AMA manual of style: A guide for authors and editors (9th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. (1973). Does sex-biased job advertising “aid and abet” sex discrimination? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 6–18.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, A. N. (2003). Changes in attitudes toward women's roles: Predicting gender role traditionalism among college students. Sex Roles, 48, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, H., & Clark, E. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  7. Conkright, L., Flannagan, D., & Dykes, J. (2000). Effects of pronouns type and gender role consistency on children's recall and interpretation of stories. Sex Roles, 43, 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper, R. (1984). The avoidance of androcentric generics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 50, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dumond, V. (1990). The elements of nonsexist usage: A guide to inclusive spoken and written English. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Fisk, W. R. (1985). Responses to “neutral” pronoun presentations and the development of sex-biased responding. Developmental Psychology, 21, 481–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank, F. W., & Treichler, P. A. (1989). Guidelines for nonsexist usage. In F. W. Frank & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Language, gender, and professional writing: Theoretical approaches and guidelines for nonsexist usage (pp. 137–280). New York: Commission on the Status of Women in the Profession, Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
  12. Gastil, J. (1990). Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics. Sex Roles, 23, 629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibaldi, J., & Lindenberger, H. (Eds.). (1998). MLA style manual (2nd ed.). New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
  14. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135.Google Scholar
  15. Hamilton, M. C. (1988). Using masculine generics: Does generic “he” increase male bias in the user's imagery? Sex Roles, 19, 785–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hyde, J. S. (1984). Children's understanding of sexist language. Developmental Psychology, 20, 697–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kidd, V. (1971). A study of the images produced through the use of a male pronoun as the generic. Movements: Contemporary Rhetoric and Communication, 1, 25–30.Google Scholar
  18. Lambdin, J. R., Greer, K. M., Jibotian, K. S., Wood, K. R., & Hamilton, M. C. (2003). The animal + male hypothesis: Children's and adult's beliefs about the sex of non-sex-specific stuffed animals. Sex Roles, 48, 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lyons, J. (1968). Theoretical linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. MacKay, D. G. (1980). Psychology, prescriptive grammar, and the pronoun problem. American Psychologist, 35, 444–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacKay, D. G. (1983). Prescriptive grammar and the pronoun problem. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender, and society (pp. 38–53). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  22. MacKay, D. G., & Fulkerson, D. (1979). On the comprehension and production of pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 661–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Madson, L., & Hessling, R. M. (1999). Does alternating between masculine and feminine pronouns eliminate perceived gender bias in text? Sex Roles, 41, 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Madson, L., & Hessling, R. M. (2001). Readers' perceptions of four alternatives to generic pronouns. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 156–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McConnell, A. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1996). Women as men and people: Effects of gender-marked language. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1004–1013.Google Scholar
  26. McConnell, A. R., & Gavanski, I. (1994, May). Women as men and people: Occupation title suffixes as primes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  27. McConnell-Ginet, S. (1989). The sexual (re)production of meaning: A discourse-based theory. In F. W. Frank & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Language, gender, and professional writing: Theoretical approaches and guidelines for nonsexist usage (pp. 35–50). New York: Commission on the Status of Women in the Profession, Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
  28. Merritt, R. D., & Kok, C. J. (1995). Attribution of gender to a gender-unspecified individual: An evaluation of the people + male hypothesis. Sex Roles, 33, 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meyers, M. (1990). Current generic pronoun usage. American Speech, 65, 228–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, C., & Swift, K. (1988). The handbook of nonsexist writing. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  31. Moulton, J., Robinson, G. M., & Elias, C. (1978). Sex bias in language use. American Psychologist, 33, 1032–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Murdock, N. L., & Forsyth, D. R. (1985). Is gender-biased language sexist? A perceptual approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 39–49.Google Scholar
  33. Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A. (2002). The gender gap in student attitudes toward sexist/nonsexist language: Implications for sport management education. Journal of Sport Management, 16, 190–208.Google Scholar
  34. Schneider, J. W., & Hacker, S. L. (1973). Sex role imagery and use of the generic “man” in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. American Sociologist, 8, 12–18.Google Scholar
  35. Schwartz, M., & the Task Force on Bias-Free Language of the Association of American University Presses. (1995). Guidelines for bias-free writing. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sklar, E. (1988). The tribunal of use: Agreement in indefinite constructions. College Composition and Communication, 39, 410–422.Google Scholar
  37. Spencer, N. J. (1978). Can “she” and “he” coexist? American Psychologist, 33, 782–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stericker, A. (1981). Does this “he or she” business really make a difference? The effect of masculine pronouns as generics on job attitudes. Sex Roles, 7, 637–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Swim, J. K., Mallettt, R., & Stangor, C. (2004). Understanding subtle sexism: Detection and use of sexist language. Sex Roles, 51, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Switzer, J. Y. (1990). The impact of generic word choices: An empirical investigation of age- and sex-related differences. Sex Roles, 22, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. University of Chicago Press Staff. (2003). Chicago manual of style (15th ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Valian, V. (1977). Linguistics and feminism. In M. Vetterline-Braggin, F. Elliston, J. English, & M. Vetterling (Eds.), Feminism and philosophy (pp. 154–166). Totowa, NJ: Littlefield Adams.Google Scholar
  44. Wilson, E., & Ng, S. H. (1988). Sex bias in visual images evoked by generics: A New Zealand study. Sex Roles, 18, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New Mexico State UniversityLas Cruces
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Box 30001/MSC 3452New Mexico State UniversityLas Cruces

Personalised recommendations