Abstract
Authors are routinely advised to avoid using masculine pronouns to refer to both men and women. Some style guides recommend alternating between masculine and feminine pronouns instead. Unfortunately, previous research with gender-neutral text indicates that readers perceive alternating pronouns to be biased in favor of women. We tested readers' perceptions of alternating pronouns in an essay on a traditionally feminine topic, on a traditionally masculine topic, and on a gender-neutral topic. There were four versions of each essay. One version alternated between masculine and feminine pronouns, a second version used paired masculine and feminine pronouns throughout the passage (e.g., ‘he or she’), and the remaining two versions used exclusively masculine pronouns or feminine pronouns. Readers overestimated the frequency of feminine pronouns in alternating text except when they occurred in an essay on a traditionally feminine topic. Readers also thought alternating pronouns were gender-biased and low in overall quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Addison Wesley Longman. (1998). Author's guide. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
American Medical Association. (1998). AMA manual of style: A guide for authors and editors (9th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. (1973). Does sex-biased job advertising “aid and abet” sex discrimination? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 6–18.
Bryant, A. N. (2003). Changes in attitudes toward women's roles: Predicting gender role traditionalism among college students. Sex Roles, 48, 131–142.
Clark, H., & Clark, E. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Conkright, L., Flannagan, D., & Dykes, J. (2000). Effects of pronouns type and gender role consistency on children's recall and interpretation of stories. Sex Roles, 43, 481–497.
Cooper, R. (1984). The avoidance of androcentric generics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 50, 5–20.
Dumond, V. (1990). The elements of nonsexist usage: A guide to inclusive spoken and written English. New York: Prentice Hall.
Fisk, W. R. (1985). Responses to “neutral” pronoun presentations and the development of sex-biased responding. Developmental Psychology, 21, 481–485.
Frank, F. W., & Treichler, P. A. (1989). Guidelines for nonsexist usage. In F. W. Frank & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Language, gender, and professional writing: Theoretical approaches and guidelines for nonsexist usage (pp. 137–280). New York: Commission on the Status of Women in the Profession, Modern Language Association of America.
Gastil, J. (1990). Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics. Sex Roles, 23, 629–643.
Gibaldi, J., & Lindenberger, H. (Eds.). (1998). MLA style manual (2nd ed.). New York: Modern Language Association.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135.
Hamilton, M. C. (1988). Using masculine generics: Does generic “he” increase male bias in the user's imagery? Sex Roles, 19, 785–799.
Hyde, J. S. (1984). Children's understanding of sexist language. Developmental Psychology, 20, 697–706.
Kidd, V. (1971). A study of the images produced through the use of a male pronoun as the generic. Movements: Contemporary Rhetoric and Communication, 1, 25–30.
Lambdin, J. R., Greer, K. M., Jibotian, K. S., Wood, K. R., & Hamilton, M. C. (2003). The animal + male hypothesis: Children's and adult's beliefs about the sex of non-sex-specific stuffed animals. Sex Roles, 48, 471–482.
Lyons, J. (1968). Theoretical linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
MacKay, D. G. (1980). Psychology, prescriptive grammar, and the pronoun problem. American Psychologist, 35, 444–449.
MacKay, D. G. (1983). Prescriptive grammar and the pronoun problem. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender, and society (pp. 38–53). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
MacKay, D. G., & Fulkerson, D. (1979). On the comprehension and production of pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 661–673.
Madson, L., & Hessling, R. M. (1999). Does alternating between masculine and feminine pronouns eliminate perceived gender bias in text? Sex Roles, 41, 559–575.
Madson, L., & Hessling, R. M. (2001). Readers' perceptions of four alternatives to generic pronouns. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 156–158.
McConnell, A. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1996). Women as men and people: Effects of gender-marked language. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1004–1013.
McConnell, A. R., & Gavanski, I. (1994, May). Women as men and people: Occupation title suffixes as primes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
McConnell-Ginet, S. (1989). The sexual (re)production of meaning: A discourse-based theory. In F. W. Frank & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Language, gender, and professional writing: Theoretical approaches and guidelines for nonsexist usage (pp. 35–50). New York: Commission on the Status of Women in the Profession, Modern Language Association of America.
Merritt, R. D., & Kok, C. J. (1995). Attribution of gender to a gender-unspecified individual: An evaluation of the people + male hypothesis. Sex Roles, 33, 145–157.
Meyers, M. (1990). Current generic pronoun usage. American Speech, 65, 228–237.
Miller, C., & Swift, K. (1988). The handbook of nonsexist writing. New York: Harper & Row.
Moulton, J., Robinson, G. M., & Elias, C. (1978). Sex bias in language use. American Psychologist, 33, 1032–1036.
Murdock, N. L., & Forsyth, D. R. (1985). Is gender-biased language sexist? A perceptual approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 39–49.
Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A. (2002). The gender gap in student attitudes toward sexist/nonsexist language: Implications for sport management education. Journal of Sport Management, 16, 190–208.
Schneider, J. W., & Hacker, S. L. (1973). Sex role imagery and use of the generic “man” in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. American Sociologist, 8, 12–18.
Schwartz, M., & the Task Force on Bias-Free Language of the Association of American University Presses. (1995). Guidelines for bias-free writing. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Sklar, E. (1988). The tribunal of use: Agreement in indefinite constructions. College Composition and Communication, 39, 410–422.
Spencer, N. J. (1978). Can “she” and “he” coexist? American Psychologist, 33, 782–783.
Stericker, A. (1981). Does this “he or she” business really make a difference? The effect of masculine pronouns as generics on job attitudes. Sex Roles, 7, 637–641.
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.
Swim, J. K., Mallettt, R., & Stangor, C. (2004). Understanding subtle sexism: Detection and use of sexist language. Sex Roles, 51, 117–128.
Switzer, J. Y. (1990). The impact of generic word choices: An empirical investigation of age- and sex-related differences. Sex Roles, 22, 69–82.
University of Chicago Press Staff. (2003). Chicago manual of style (15th ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Valian, V. (1977). Linguistics and feminism. In M. Vetterline-Braggin, F. Elliston, J. English, & M. Vetterling (Eds.), Feminism and philosophy (pp. 154–166). Totowa, NJ: Littlefield Adams.
Wilson, E., & Ng, S. H. (1988). Sex bias in visual images evoked by generics: A New Zealand study. Sex Roles, 18, 159–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Madson, L., Shoda, J. Alternating Between Masculine and Feminine Pronouns: Does Essay Topic Affect Readers' Perceptions?. Sex Roles 54, 275–285 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9344-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9344-0