Sex Roles

, Volume 54, Issue 11–12, pp 845–857 | Cite as

Adolescents’ Expectations About Mothers’ Employment: Life Course Patterns and Parental Influence

Original Article


Because of social constraint and personal preference, cutting back and dropping out of the workforce remain common responses to the problem of balancing work and motherhood. To understand whether this phenomenon will continue, adolescents from middle-class, dual-earner families (N = 194) were asked how much they expected that they (for girls) or their future partners (for boys) would work while raising children. Nearly all expected new mothers to quit their jobs or reduce their hours temporarily, which signifies either acceptance of, or ignorance of, the penalties of career interruption among girls with high occupational aspirations. Adolescents’ expectations were associated with their mothers’ employment histories and support for gender egalitarianism, as well as the level of challenge in the home environment.


Adolescents Expectations Life course Mothers Work–family conflict 


  1. Acock, A. C., & Bengtson, V. L. (1978). On the relative influence of mothers and fathers: A covariance analysis of political and religious socialization. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baber, K. M., & Monaghan, P. (1988). College women’s career and motherhood expectations: New options, old dilemmas. Sex Roles, 19, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker, K. (1993). Changing assumptions and contingent solutions: The costs and benefits of women working full- and part-time. Sex Roles, 28, 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brewster, K. L., & Padavic, I. (2000). Change in gender ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cunningham, M. (2001). The influence of parental attitudes and behaviors on children’s attitudes toward gender and household labor in early adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davey, F. H. (1998). Young women’s expected and preferred patterns of employment and child care. Sex Roles, 38, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennehy, K., & Mortimer, J. T. (1993). Work and family orientations of contemporary adolescent boys and girls. In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 87–107). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Deutsch, F. M. (1999). Halving it all: How equally shared parenting works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Drobnic, S., & Wittig, I. (1997). Part-time work in the United States of America. In H. P. Blossfeld & C. Hakim (Eds.), Between equalization and marginalization: Women working part-time in Europe and the United States of America (pp. 289–314). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. East, P. L. (1998). Racial and ethnic differences in girls’ sexual, marital and birth expectations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerson, K. (1985). Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Glass, J., Bengtson, V. L., & Dunham, C. C. (1986). Attitude similarity in three-generation families: Socialization, status inheritance, or reciprocal influence? American Sociological Review, 51, 685–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2003). Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Hagenaars, J. A. (1990). Categorical longitudinal data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Hakim, C. (2000). Work–lifestyle choices in the 21st century: Preference theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, K. M., Duncan, G. J., & Boisjoly, J. (2002). Evaluating the role of “nothing to lose” attitudes on risky behavior in adolescence. Social Forces, 80, 1005–1039.Google Scholar
  18. Hertz, R. (1986). More equal than others: Women and men in dual-career marriages. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  20. Hoffnung, M. (2004). Wanting it all: Career, marriage, and motherhood during college-educated women’s 20s. Sex Roles, 50, 711–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoogstra, L. (2005). The design of the 500 Family Study. In B. Schneider & L. J. Waite (Eds.), Being together, working apart: Dual-career families and the work-life balance (pp. 18–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kaufman, G., & Uhlenberg, P. (2000). The influence of parenthood on the work effort of married men and women. Social Forces, 78, 931–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Machung, A. (1989). Talking career, thinking job: Gender differences in career and family expectations of Berkeley seniors. Feminist Studies, 15, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maier, K. S. (2005). Transmitting educational values: Parent occupation and adolescent development. In B. Schneider & L. J. Waite (Eds.), Being together, working apart: Dual-career families and the work–life balance (pp. 396–418). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Maines, D. R., & Hardesty, M. J. (1987). Temporality and gender: Young adults’ career and family plans. Social Forces, 66, 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCutcheon, A. L. (1987). Latent class analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Moen, P., Erickson, M. A., & Dempster-McClain, D. (1997). Their mother’s daughters? The intergenerational transmission of gender attitudes in a world of changing roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moen, P., & Yu, Y. (2000). Effective work/life strategies: Working couples, work conditions, gender, and life quality. Social Problems, 47, 291–326.Google Scholar
  29. Nock, S. L. (1998). Marriage in men’s lives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. O’Connell, L., Betz, M., & Kurth, S. (1989). Plans for balancing work and family life: Do women pursuing nontraditional and traditional occupations differ? Sex Roles, 20, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Perry-Jenkins, M., Repetti, R. L., & Crouter, A. C. (2000). Work and family in the 1990s. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Understanding families into the new millennium: A decade in review (pp. 200–217). Lawrence, KS: National Council on Family Relations.Google Scholar
  32. Rathunde, K. (1996). Family context and talented adolescents’ optimal experience in school-related activities. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 603–626.Google Scholar
  33. Rathunde, K., Carroll, M. E., & Huang, M. P. (2000). Families and the forming of children’s occupational future. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & B. Schneider (Eds.), Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work (pp. 113–140). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Schneider, B., & Stevenson, D. (1999). The ambitious generation: America’s teenagers motivated but directionless. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schroeder, K. A., Blood, L. L., & Maluso, D. (1992). An intergenerational analysis of expectations for women’s career and family roles. Sex Roles, 26, 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sewell, W. H., & Hauser, R. M. (1980). The Wisconsin longitudinal study of social and psychological factors in aspirations and achievements. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 1, 59–99.Google Scholar
  37. Starrels, M. E. (1992). Attitude similarity between mothers and children regarding maternal employment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stephan, C. W., & Corder, J. (1985). The effects of dual-career families on adolescents’ sex-role attitudes, work and family plans, and choices of important others. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 921–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Steunkel, C. P. (2005). A strategy for working families: high-level commodification of household services. In B. Schneider & L. J. Waite (Eds.), Being together, working apart: Dual-career families and the work–life balance (pp. 252–272). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Thornton, A. (1989). Changing attitudes toward family issues in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 873–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thornton, A., Alwin, D. F., & Camburn, D. (1983). Causes and consequences of sex-role attitude change. American Sociological Review, 48, 211–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Townsend, N. W. (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work, and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2005). Latent GOLD 4.0 user’s guide. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations.Google Scholar
  44. Yamaguchi, K. (2000). Multinomial logit latent class regression models: An analysis of the predictors of gender-role attitudes among Japanese women. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1702–1740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyFordham UniversityBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations