Skip to main content

“Kiss Your Period Good-Bye”: Menstrual Suppression in the Popular Press

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the content of popular press articles about menstrual suppression, a relatively new and controversial health care option. Twenty-two American and Canadian articles, published before the FDA approval of Seasonale, were coded for basic information about and indications for menstrual suppression, viewpoints included, and coverage of risks and benefits. Menstrual suppression was most often recommended for women with menstrual disorders but was also recommended to menstruating women in general as a matter of convenience. Advocates of menstrual suppression were quoted twice as often as opponents. Monthly menstruation was frequently described as messy, inconvenient, bothersome, unhealthy, and unnecessary. From this analysis, we concluded that popular press coverage of menstrual suppression is insufficient and biased. The articles reflect and reinforce the taboo status and medicalization of menstruation. This coverage may have primed potential consumers to anticipate the FDA approval of Seasonale eagerly, to evaluate it uncritically, and to pursue it as a birth control and menstrual health option. Implications for research, health care providers, and menstrual activists are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Association of Reproductive Health Professionals. (2002). Women don't rely on periods as indicators of pregnancy, good health, or fertility. Women's Health Weekly, p. 16.

  2. Braunstein, J. B., Hausfield, J., Hausfield, J., & London, A. (2003). Econoomics of reducing menstruation with trimonthly-cycle oral contraceptive therapy: Comparison with standard-cycle regimens. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 102, 699–708.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks-Gunn, J. (1985). The salience and timing of the menstrual flow. Psychosomatic Medicine, 47, 363–371.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks-Gunn, J., & Ruble, D. N. (1980). The menstrual attitude questionnaire. Psychosomatic Medicine, 42, 503–511.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carlson, E. S., Li, S., & Holm, K. (1997). An analysis of menopause in the popular press. Health Care for Women International, 18, 557–564.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chrisler, J. C. (1988). Age, sex-role orientation, and attitudes toward menstruation. Psychological Reports, 63, 827–834.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chrisler, J. C., Johnston, I. K., Champagne, N. M., & Preston, K. E. (1994). Menstrual joy: The construct and its consequences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chrisler, J. C., & Johnston-Robledo, I. (2000). Motherhood and reproductive issues. In M. Biaggio & M. Hersen (Eds.), Issues in the psychology of women (pp. 199–226). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chrisler, J. C., & Levy, K. B. (1990). The media construct a menstrual monster: A content analysis of PMS articles in the popular press. Women & Health, 16(2), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coutinho, E. M., & Segal, S. J. (1999). Is menstruation obsolete? New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coutts, L. B., & Berg, D. H. (1993). The portrayal of the menstruating woman in menstrual advertisements. Health Care for Women International, 14, 179–191.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. den Tonkelaar, I., & Oddens, B. J. (1999). Preferred frequency and characteristics of menstrual bleeding in relation to reproductive status, oral contraceptive use, and hormone replacement therapy use. Contraception, 59, 357–362.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Erchull, M. J., Chrisler, J. C., Gorman, J. A., & Johnston-Robledo, I. (2002). Education and advertising: A content analysis of commercially produced booklets about menstruation. Journal of Early Adolescence, 22, 455–474.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., White, K. B., & Holmgren, K. M. (2003). The role of hostile and benevolent sexism in women's and men's perceptions of menstruating women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gannon, L., & Sevens, J. (1998). Portraits of menopause in the media. Women & Health, 27(3), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Geller, S. E., Harlow, S. D., & Bernstein, S. J. (1999). Differences in menstrual bleeding characteristics, functional status, and attitudes toward menstruation in three groups of women. Journal of Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 8, 533–540.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Golub, S. (1992). Periods: From menarche to menopause. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Glasier, A. F., Smith, K. B., van der Spuy, Z. M., Ho, P. C., Cheng, L., Dada, K., et al. (2003). Amenorrhea associated with contraception: An international study on acceptability. Contraception, 67, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grumman, R. (2000). Kiss your period good-bye. Cosmopolitan, pp. 249–251.

  20. Hitchcock, C. L., & Prior, J. C. (2003). Experiments and opinions on menstrual suppression from the scientific literature. In N. Reame (Chair), The menstrual suppression controversy: medical, psychological and sociocultural perspectives. Symposium presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research, Pittsburgh, PA.

  21. Johnson, S. K. (2001). No more periods? Ladies’ Home Journal, pp. 70–72.

  22. Johnston-Robledo, I., Ball, M., Lauta, K., & Zekoll, A. (2003). To bleed or not to bleed: Young women's attitudes toward menstrual suppression. Women & Health, 38, 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kissling, E. A. (1996). Bleeding out loud: Communication about menstruation. Feminism & Psychology, 6, 481–504.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kowalski, R. M., & Chapple, T. (2000). The social stigma of menstruation: Fact or fiction? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kwiecien, M., Edelman, A., Nichols, M. D., & Jensen, J. T. (2003). Bleeding patterns and patient acceptability of standard or continuous dosing regimens of a low-dose oral contraceptive: A randomized trial. Contraception, 67, 9–13.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lyons, A. C. (2000). Examining media respresentations: Benefits for health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Martinez, R., Johnston-Robledo, I., Ulsh, H. M., & Chrisler, J. C. (2000). Singing the blues: A content analysis of postpartum depression articles in the popular press. Women & Health, 31(2/3), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McKeever, P. (1984). The perpetuation of menstrual shame: Implications and directions. Women & Health, 9, 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller, L., & Hughes, J. P. (2003). Continuous combination oral contraceptive pills to eliminate withdrawal bleeding: A randomized trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 101, 653–661.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller, L., & Notter, K. M. (2001). Menstrual reduction with extended use of combination oral contraceptive pills: Randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 98, 771–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Morse, J. M., & Kieren, D. (1993). The Adolescent Menstrual Attitude Questionnaire, part II: Normative scores. Health Care for Women International, 14, 63–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oxley, T. (1998). Menstrual management: An exploratory study. Feminism & Psychology, 8, 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roberts, T. A. (2004). Female trouble: The menstrual self-evaluation scale and women's self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Roberts, T. A., Goldenberg, J. L., Power, C., & Pyszczynski, T. (2002). “Feminine protection”: The effects of menstruation on attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sucato, G. S., & Gold, M. A. (2002). Tips for clinicians: Extended cycling of oral contraceptive pills for adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Adolescent Gynecology, 15, 325–327.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sulak, P. J., Kuehl, T. J., Ortiz, M., & Shull, B. L. (2002). Acceptance of altering the standard 21-day/7-day oral contraceptive regimen to delay menses and reduce hormone withdrawal symptoms. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186, 1142–1149.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Weston, L. C., & Ruggiero, J. A. (1985). The popular approach to women's health issues: A content analysis of women's magazines in the 1970s. Women & Health, 10(4), 47–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingrid Johnston-Robledo.

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the June 2003 meeting of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research, Pittsburgh, PA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnston-Robledo, I., Barnack, J. & Wares, S. “Kiss Your Period Good-Bye”: Menstrual Suppression in the Popular Press. Sex Roles 54, 353 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9007-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Menstruation
  • Menstrual suppression
  • Popular press