Advertisement

Sex Roles

, 54:353 | Cite as

“Kiss Your Period Good-Bye”: Menstrual Suppression in the Popular Press

  • Ingrid Johnston-RobledoEmail author
  • Jessica Barnack
  • Stephanie Wares
Original Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the content of popular press articles about menstrual suppression, a relatively new and controversial health care option. Twenty-two American and Canadian articles, published before the FDA approval of Seasonale, were coded for basic information about and indications for menstrual suppression, viewpoints included, and coverage of risks and benefits. Menstrual suppression was most often recommended for women with menstrual disorders but was also recommended to menstruating women in general as a matter of convenience. Advocates of menstrual suppression were quoted twice as often as opponents. Monthly menstruation was frequently described as messy, inconvenient, bothersome, unhealthy, and unnecessary. From this analysis, we concluded that popular press coverage of menstrual suppression is insufficient and biased. The articles reflect and reinforce the taboo status and medicalization of menstruation. This coverage may have primed potential consumers to anticipate the FDA approval of Seasonale eagerly, to evaluate it uncritically, and to pursue it as a birth control and menstrual health option. Implications for research, health care providers, and menstrual activists are discussed.

Keywords

Menstruation Menstrual suppression Popular press 

References

  1. Association of Reproductive Health Professionals. (2002). Women don't rely on periods as indicators of pregnancy, good health, or fertility. Women's Health Weekly, p. 16.Google Scholar
  2. Braunstein, J. B., Hausfield, J., Hausfield, J., & London, A. (2003). Econoomics of reducing menstruation with trimonthly-cycle oral contraceptive therapy: Comparison with standard-cycle regimens. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 102, 699–708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks-Gunn, J. (1985). The salience and timing of the menstrual flow. Psychosomatic Medicine, 47, 363–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks-Gunn, J., & Ruble, D. N. (1980). The menstrual attitude questionnaire. Psychosomatic Medicine, 42, 503–511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlson, E. S., Li, S., & Holm, K. (1997). An analysis of menopause in the popular press. Health Care for Women International, 18, 557–564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chrisler, J. C. (1988). Age, sex-role orientation, and attitudes toward menstruation. Psychological Reports, 63, 827–834.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chrisler, J. C., Johnston, I. K., Champagne, N. M., & Preston, K. E. (1994). Menstrual joy: The construct and its consequences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chrisler, J. C., & Johnston-Robledo, I. (2000). Motherhood and reproductive issues. In M. Biaggio & M. Hersen (Eds.), Issues in the psychology of women (pp. 199–226). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  9. Chrisler, J. C., & Levy, K. B. (1990). The media construct a menstrual monster: A content analysis of PMS articles in the popular press. Women & Health, 16(2), 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coutinho, E. M., & Segal, S. J. (1999). Is menstruation obsolete? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Coutts, L. B., & Berg, D. H. (1993). The portrayal of the menstruating woman in menstrual advertisements. Health Care for Women International, 14, 179–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. den Tonkelaar, I., & Oddens, B. J. (1999). Preferred frequency and characteristics of menstrual bleeding in relation to reproductive status, oral contraceptive use, and hormone replacement therapy use. Contraception, 59, 357–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erchull, M. J., Chrisler, J. C., Gorman, J. A., & Johnston-Robledo, I. (2002). Education and advertising: A content analysis of commercially produced booklets about menstruation. Journal of Early Adolescence, 22, 455–474.Google Scholar
  14. Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., White, K. B., & Holmgren, K. M. (2003). The role of hostile and benevolent sexism in women's and men's perceptions of menstruating women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gannon, L., & Sevens, J. (1998). Portraits of menopause in the media. Women & Health, 27(3), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geller, S. E., Harlow, S. D., & Bernstein, S. J. (1999). Differences in menstrual bleeding characteristics, functional status, and attitudes toward menstruation in three groups of women. Journal of Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 8, 533–540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Golub, S. (1992). Periods: From menarche to menopause. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Glasier, A. F., Smith, K. B., van der Spuy, Z. M., Ho, P. C., Cheng, L., Dada, K., et al. (2003). Amenorrhea associated with contraception: An international study on acceptability. Contraception, 67, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grumman, R. (2000). Kiss your period good-bye. Cosmopolitan, pp. 249–251.Google Scholar
  20. Hitchcock, C. L., & Prior, J. C. (2003). Experiments and opinions on menstrual suppression from the scientific literature. In N. Reame (Chair), The menstrual suppression controversy: medical, psychological and sociocultural perspectives. Symposium presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, S. K. (2001). No more periods? Ladies’ Home Journal, pp. 70–72.Google Scholar
  22. Johnston-Robledo, I., Ball, M., Lauta, K., & Zekoll, A. (2003). To bleed or not to bleed: Young women's attitudes toward menstrual suppression. Women & Health, 38, 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kissling, E. A. (1996). Bleeding out loud: Communication about menstruation. Feminism & Psychology, 6, 481–504.Google Scholar
  24. Kowalski, R. M., & Chapple, T. (2000). The social stigma of menstruation: Fact or fiction? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kwiecien, M., Edelman, A., Nichols, M. D., & Jensen, J. T. (2003). Bleeding patterns and patient acceptability of standard or continuous dosing regimens of a low-dose oral contraceptive: A randomized trial. Contraception, 67, 9–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyons, A. C. (2000). Examining media respresentations: Benefits for health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martinez, R., Johnston-Robledo, I., Ulsh, H. M., & Chrisler, J. C. (2000). Singing the blues: A content analysis of postpartum depression articles in the popular press. Women & Health, 31(2/3), 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McKeever, P. (1984). The perpetuation of menstrual shame: Implications and directions. Women & Health, 9, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, L., & Hughes, J. P. (2003). Continuous combination oral contraceptive pills to eliminate withdrawal bleeding: A randomized trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 101, 653–661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, L., & Notter, K. M. (2001). Menstrual reduction with extended use of combination oral contraceptive pills: Randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 98, 771–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morse, J. M., & Kieren, D. (1993). The Adolescent Menstrual Attitude Questionnaire, part II: Normative scores. Health Care for Women International, 14, 63–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Oxley, T. (1998). Menstrual management: An exploratory study. Feminism & Psychology, 8, 185–191.Google Scholar
  33. Roberts, T. A. (2004). Female trouble: The menstrual self-evaluation scale and women's self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roberts, T. A., Goldenberg, J. L., Power, C., & Pyszczynski, T. (2002). “Feminine protection”: The effects of menstruation on attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sucato, G. S., & Gold, M. A. (2002). Tips for clinicians: Extended cycling of oral contraceptive pills for adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Adolescent Gynecology, 15, 325–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sulak, P. J., Kuehl, T. J., Ortiz, M., & Shull, B. L. (2002). Acceptance of altering the standard 21-day/7-day oral contraceptive regimen to delay menses and reduce hormone withdrawal symptoms. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186, 1142–1149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weston, L. C., & Ruggiero, J. A. (1985). The popular approach to women's health issues: A content analysis of women's magazines in the 1970s. Women & Health, 10(4), 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingrid Johnston-Robledo
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jessica Barnack
    • 1
  • Stephanie Wares
    • 1
  1. 1.State University of New York, FredoniaNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologySUNY Fredonia, FredoniaNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations