Sex Roles

, Volume 53, Issue 9–10, pp 619–633 | Cite as

Characteristics of Boys' and Girls' Toys

Abstract

In Study 1, 292 undergraduates rated 126 toys as to whether they were suitable for boys, girls, or both. From these ratings, we established five categories of toys: strongly masculine, moderately masculine, neutral, moderately feminine, and strongly feminine. Using these categories, we constructed four toysets; each consisted of 15 toys, three from each category. In Study 2, 706 undergraduates individually rated the toys from one of the toysets on 26 scales that measured the toys' characteristics. We found that girls' toys were associated with physical attractiveness, nurturance, and domestic skill, whereas boys' toys were rated as violent, competitive, exciting, and somewhat dangerous. The toys rated as most likely to be educational and to develop children's physical, cognitive, artistic, and other skills were typically rated as neutral or moderately masculine. We conclude that strongly gender-typed toys appear to be less supportive of optimal development than neutral or moderately gender-typed toys.

Key Words

toys gender masculine feminine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, G. M. (2003). An evolutionary perspective of sex-typed toy preferences: Pink, blue, and the brain. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 7–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, G. M., & Hines, M. (2002). Sex differences in response to children's toys in nonhuman primates (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 467–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almqvist, B. (1989). Age and gender differences in children's Christmas requests. Play and Culture, 2, 2–19.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12, 353–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family. American Psychologist, 56, 781–796.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blakemore, J. E. O., LaRue, A. A., & Olejnik, A. B. (1979). Sex-appropriate toy preference and the ability to conceptualize toys as sex-role related. Developmental Psychology, 15, 339–340.Google Scholar
  7. Block, J. H. (1983). Differential premises arising from differential socialization of the sexes: Some conjectures. Child Development, 54, 1335–1354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradbard, M. R. (1985). Sex differences in adults' gifts and children's toy requests at Christmas. Psychological Reports, 56, 969–970.Google Scholar
  9. Bradbard, M. R., & Parkman, S. A. (1984). Gender differences in preschool children's toy requests. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 145, 283–284.Google Scholar
  10. Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2001). Effects of televised violence on aggression. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 223–254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, A., Shirley, L., Heywood, C., & Crook, C. (2000). Infants' visual preference for sex-congruent babies, children, toys and activities: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 479–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carter, D. B., & Levy, G. D. (1988). Cognitive aspects of early sex-role development: The influence of gender schemas on preschoolers' memories and preferences for sex-typed toys and activities. Child Development, 59, 782–792.Google Scholar
  13. Cassell, J., & Jenkins, H. (1998). From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cherney, I. D., Kelly-Vance, L., Glover, K. G., Ruane, A., & Ryalls, B. O. (2003). The effects of stereotyped toys and gender on play assessment in children aged 18–47 months. Educational Psychology, 23, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Lisi, R., & Wolford, J. L. (2002). Improving children's mental rotation accuracy with computer game playing. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163, 272–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Downs, A. C. (1983). Letters to Santa Claus: Elementary school-age children's sex-typed toy preferences in a natural setting. Sex Roles, 9, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Etaugh, C., & Liss, M. B. (1992). Home, school, and playroom: Training grounds for adult gender roles. Sex Roles, 26, 129–147.Google Scholar
  18. Fisher-Thompson, D. (1993). Adult toy purchases for children: Factors affecting sex-typed toy selection. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 14, 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher-Thompson, D., Sausa, A. D., & Wright, T. F. (1995). Toy selection for children: Personality and toy request influences. Sex Roles, 33, 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldstein, J. (1995). Aggressive toy play. In A. D. Pellegrini (Ed.), The future of play theory: A multidisciplinary inquiry into the contributions of Brian Sutton-Smith (pp. 127–147). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  21. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenfield, P. M., deWinstanley, P., Kilpatrick, H., & Kaye, D. (1996). Action video games and informal education: Effects on strategies for dividing visual attention. In P. M. Greenfield & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), Interacting with video. Advances in applied developmental psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 187–205). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  23. Hellendoorn, J., & Harinck, F. J. H. (1997). War toy play and aggression in Dutch kindergarten children. Social Development, 6, 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klugman, K. (1999). A bad hair day for G. I. Joe. In B. L. Clark & M. R. Higonnet (Eds.), Girls, boys, books, toys (pp. 169–182). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kutner, N. G., & Levinson, R. M. (1978). The toy salesperson: A voice for change in sex-role stereotypes? Sex Roles, 4, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marcon, R. A., & Freeman, G. (1996). Linking gender-related toy preferences to social structure: Changes in children's letters to Santa since 1978. Journal of Psychological Practice, 2, 1–10.Google Scholar
  27. Markee, N. L., Pedersen, E. L., Murray, C. I., & Stacey, P. B. (1994). What role do fashion dolls play in socialization of children? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 187–190.Google Scholar
  28. Martin, C. L. (1989). Children's use of gender-related information in making social judgments. Developmental Psychology, 25, 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin, C. L., Eisenbud, L., & Rose, H. (1995). Children's gender-based reasoning about toys. Child Development, 66, 1453–1471.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, C. L. (1987). Qualitative differences among gender-stereotyped toys: Implications for cognitive and social development in girls and boys. Sex Roles, 16, 473–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reynolds, K. (1994). Toys for boys and girls. Science Scope, 17, 64.Google Scholar
  32. Rheingold, H. L., & Cook, K. V. (1975). The contents of boys' and girls' rooms as an index of parents' behavior. Child Development, 46, 459–463.Google Scholar
  33. Richardson, J. G., & Simpson, C. H. (1982). Children, gender, and social structure: An analysis of the contents of letters to Santa Claus. Child Development, 53, 429–436.Google Scholar
  34. Robinson, C. C., & Morris, J. T. (1986). The gender-stereotyped nature of Christmas toys received by 36-, 48-, and 60-month-old children: A comparison between nonrequested vs. requested toys. Sex Roles, 15, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robinson, C. C., Watson, J. A., & Morris, J. T. (1984). An examination of fundamental sex-role behavioral change: Mothers' toy purchasing behavior. Parenting Studies, 1, 61–66.Google Scholar
  36. Serbin, L. A., Poulin-Dubois, D., Colburne, K. A., Sen, M. G., & Eichstedt, J. A. (2001). Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender-stereotyped toys in the second year. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 7–15.Google Scholar
  37. Servin, A., Bohlin, G., & Berlin, L. (1999). Sex differences in 1-, 3-, and 5-year-olds' toy-choice in a structured play-session. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 43–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ungar, S. B. (1982). The sex-typing of adult and child behavior in toy sales. Sex Roles, 8, 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Watson, M. W., & Peng, Y. (1992). The relation between toy gun play and children's aggressive behavior. Early Education and Development, 3, 370–389.Google Scholar
  40. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith E. Owen Blakemore
    • 1
    • 2
  • Renee E. Centers
    • 1
  1. 1.Indiana University–Purdue University Fort WayneFort Wayne
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyIndiana University–Purdue University Fort WayneFort WayneIndiana

Personalised recommendations