Sex Roles

, Volume 53, Issue 7–8, pp 487–493 | Cite as

Fraternity Membership, the Display of Degrading Sexual Images of Women, and Rape Myth Acceptance

  • E. Timothy Bleecker
  • Sarah K. MurnenEmail author


The present study was conducted to learn more about the association between fraternity membership and attitudes and behaviors associated with sexual aggression against women. A male experimenter took digital pictures of all of the images of women displayed in the rooms of 30 fraternity men and 30 non-fraternity men on a residential, small, liberal arts college campus. The men also filled out a rape myth acceptance scale. A total of 91 images were found in the form of posters, “pin-ups,” advertisements, or computer screen savers. It was found that fraternity men had significantly more images of women displayed in their rooms and that the images were rated significantly more degrading than those in the rooms of non-fraternity men. Fraternity men were found to have significantly higher scores on a rape supportive attitude scale (RSA). RSA scores were positively related to the amount of degradation in the images found in men's rooms. The possible purposes and consequences of the display of degrading sexual images are discussed.


fraternities sexual degrading 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbey, A., McAuslan, P., Ross, L. T., & Zawacki, T. (1999). Alcohol expectancies regarding sex, aggression, and sexual vulnerability: Reliability and validity assessment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13, 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akers, R. (1991). Social contexts and social learning in sexual coercion and aggression: Assessing the contributions of fraternity membership. Family Relations, 40, 58–64.Google Scholar
  3. Boeringer, S. B. (1996). Influences of fraternity membership, athletics, and male living arrangements on sexual aggression. Violence Against Women, 2, 134–147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boeringer, S. B. (1999). Associations of rape-supportive attitudes with fraternal and athletic participation. Violence Against Women, 5, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boeringer, S. B., Shehan, C. L., & Akers, R. L. (1991). Social contexts and social learning in sexual coercion and aggression: Assessing the contribution of fraternity membership. Family Relations, 40, 58–64.Google Scholar
  6. Boswell, A., & Spade, S. Z. (1996). Fraternities and collegiate rape culture: Why are some fraternities more dangerous places for women? Gender and Society, 10, 133–145.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, T. J., Sumner, K. E., & Nocera, R. (2002). Understanding sexual aggression against women: An examination of the role of men's athletic participation and related variables. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 937–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  9. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 217–230.Google Scholar
  10. Cowan, G., & Dunn, K. F. (1994). What themes in pornography lead to perceptions of the degradation of women? Journal of Sex Research, 31, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craig, M. E. (1990). Coercive sexuality in dating relationships: A situational model. Clinical psychology review, 10, 395–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crosset, T. W., Ptacek, J., McDonald, M. A., & Benedict, J. R. (1996). Male student-athletes and violence against women: Exploring the link between sexual violence and institutional practices. Sex Roles, 24, 31–41.Google Scholar
  13. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998). Male peer support and woman abuse in postsecondary school courtship: Suggestions for new directions in sociological research. In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 83–96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Dworkin, A., & MacKinnon, C. A. (1988). Pornography and civil rights: A new day for women's equality. Minneapolis, MN: Organizing Against Pornography.Google Scholar
  15. Ehrhart, J. K., & Sandler, B. R. (1986). Party rape. Response to the Victimization of Women and Children, 9, 2–5.Google Scholar
  16. French, M. (1992). The war against women. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  17. Frinter, M. P., & Rubinson, L. (1993). Acquaintance rape: The influence of alcohol, fraternity membership, and sports team membership. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 19, 272–284.Google Scholar
  18. Garrett-Gooding, J., & Senter, R. (1987). Attitudes and acts of sexual aggression on a university campus. Sociological Inquiry, 59, 348–371.Google Scholar
  19. Godenzi, A., Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (2001). Toward a gendered social bond/male peer support theory of university woman abuse. Critical Criminology, 10, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Golde, J. A., Strassberg, D. S., Turner, C. M., & Lowe, K. (2000). Attitudinal effects of degrading themes and sexual explicitness in video materials. Sexual Abuse, 12, 223–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall, G. C. N., & Hirschman, R. (1991). Toward a theory of sexual aggression: A quadripartite model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 662–669.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalof, L., & Cargill, T. (1991). Fraternity and sorority membership and gender dominance attitudes. Sex Roles, 23, 417–423.Google Scholar
  23. Kanin, E. J. (1984). Date rape: Unofficial criminals and victims. Victimology, 9, 95–108.Google Scholar
  24. Kanin, E. J. (1985). Date rapists, differential sexual socialization, and relative deprivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 219–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Koss, M. P., & Gaines, J. A. (1993). The prediction of sexual aggression by alcohol use, athletic participation, and fraternity affiliation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 94–108.Google Scholar
  26. Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). The sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422–423.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lottes, I. (1998). Rape supportive attitude scale. In C. D. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 504–505). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Lottes, I., & Kuriloff, P. (1994). Sexual socialization differences by gender, Greek membership, ethnicity, and religious background. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 203–219.Google Scholar
  29. Mahoney, E. R., Shively, M. D., & Traw, M. (1986). Sexual coercion and assault: Male socialization and female risk. Sexual coercion and assault, 1, 2–8.Google Scholar
  30. Malamuth, N. M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 138–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin, P. Y., & Hummer, R. A. (1989). Fraternities and rape on campus. Gender and Society, 3, 457–473.Google Scholar
  32. Murnen, S. K. (2000). Gender and the use of sexually degrading language. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 319–327.Google Scholar
  33. Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O'Sullivan, C. (1991). Acquaintance gang rape on campus. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 140–156). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Polaschek, D. L. L., & Ward, T. (2002). The implicit theories of potential rapists: What our questionnaires tell us. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rudman, W., & Hagawara, A. (1992). Sexual exploitation in advertising and wellness products. Women and Health, 18, 77–89.Google Scholar
  37. Sanday, P. R. (1990). Fraternity gang rape: Sex, brotherhood, and privilege on campus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Schaeffer, A. M., & Nelson, E. S. (1993). Rape-supportive attitudes: Effects of on-campus residence and education. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 175–179.Google Scholar
  39. Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Schwartz, M. D., & NoGrady, C. A. (1996). Fraternity membership, rape myths, and sexual aggression on a college campus. Violence Against Women, 2, 148–157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sheffield, C. J. (1987). Sexual terrorism: The social control of women. In B. B. Hess & M. M. Ferree (Eds.), Analyzing gender: A handbook of social science research (pp. 171–189). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, D., & Stewart, S. (2003). Sexual aggression and sports participation. Journal of Sport Behavior, 26, 384–396.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kenyon CollegeGambier
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyKenyon CollegeGambier

Personalised recommendations