How Important Is the Digital Divide? The Relation of Computer and Videogame Usage to Gender Differences in Mental Rotation Ability
Researchers interested in the associations of gender with spatial experience and spatial ability have not yet focused on several activities that have become common in the modern digital age. In this study, using a new questionnaire called the Survey of Spatial Representation and Activities (SSRA), we examined spatial experiences with computers and videogames in a sample of nearly 1,300 undergraduate students. Large gender differences, which favored men, were found in computer experience. Although men and women also differed on SAT scores, gender differences in computer experience were still apparent with SAT factored out. Furthermore, men and women with high and low levels of computer experience, who were selected for more intensive study, were found to differ significantly on the Mental Rotations Test (MRT). Path analyses showed that computer experience substantially mediates the gender difference in spatial ability observed on the MRT. These results collectively suggest that the “Digital Divide” is an important phenomenon and that encouraging women and girls to gain spatial experiences, such as computer usage, might help to bridge the gap in spatial ability between the sexes.
Keywordsgender differences spatial ability mental rotation computer experience
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cooper, J. (2003). Gender and computers: Understanding the digital divide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- De Lisi, R., & Cammarano, D. (1996). Computer experience and gender differences in undergraduate mental rotation performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 351–361.Google Scholar
- Dominick, J. (1984). Videogames, television violence, and aggression in teenagers. Communication, 34, 136–147.Google Scholar
- Gagnon, D. (1985). Videogames and spatial skills: An exploratory study. Educational Communication and Technology, 33, 263–275.Google Scholar
- Global Internet Trends. (2001, First Quarter). 420 million people with internet access. Retrieved August, 2003, from http://www.matrade.gov.my/ecommerce/news-archive/stat-4htm.
- Goodman, L. (1960). On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55, 708–713.Google Scholar
- Klatzky, R., Golledge, R., Loomis, J., Cicinelli, J., & Pellegrino, J. (1995). Performance of blind and sighted persons on spatial tasks. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 89, 70–82.Google Scholar
- Larson, P., Rizzo, A., Buckwalter, J., Van Rooyen, A., Kratz, K., Neumann, U., et al. (1999). Gender issues in the use of virtual environments. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 2, 113–123.Google Scholar
- MacKinnon, D., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41–62.Google Scholar
- Masters, M. (1998). The gender difference on the Mental Rotation Test is not due to performance factors. Memory and Cognition, 26, 444–448.Google Scholar
- McClurg, P., & Chaille, C. (1987). Computer games: Environments for developing spatial cognition? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 95–111.Google Scholar
- Morlock, L., & Yamanaka, E. (1985). Measuring women's attitudes, goals, and literacy toward computers and advanced technology. Educational Technology, 25, 12–14.Google Scholar
- Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2001, February). The changing online population: It's more and more like the general population. Retrieved August, 2003, from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/.
- Provenzo, E. (1991). Video kids: Making sense of Nintendo. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Rizzo, A., Buckwalter, J., Neumann, U., Chua, C., Van Rooyen, A., Larson, P., et al. (1999). Virtual environments for targeting cognitive processes: An overview of projects at the University of Southern California. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 2, 89–100.Google Scholar
- Rushbrook, S. (1986). The “message” of video games: Social implications. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(6-B), 534B.Google Scholar
- Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. (1996). Effect of videogame practice on spatial skills in girls and boys. In P. Greenfield & R. Cocking (Eds.), Interacting with video (pp. 95–114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Tracy, D. (1990). Toy-playing behavior, sex-role orientation, spatial ability, and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 637–649.Google Scholar