Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 53, Issue 5–6, pp 385–399 | Cite as

Rape Perceptions, Gender Role Attitudes, and Victim-Perpetrator Acquaintance

  • Sarah Ben-David
  • Ofra Schneider
Article

Abstract

The connection between rape perceptions, gender role attitudes, and victim-perpetrator acquaintance was examined. One hundred fifty Israeli students rated their perceptions of the victim, the perpetrator, the situation, and the appropriate punishment, after reading scenarios in which rape was committed by a neighbor, an ex-boyfriend, and a current life partner. Significant negative correlations were found between gender-role attitudes and four measures of rape perceptions. “Traditionals” minimized the severity of all rapes more than “Egalitarians” did. As the acquaintance level increased, there was a greater tendency to minimize the severity of the rape, in the perceptions of the victim, the situation, and the punishment; the situation was characterized less as rape, and was perceived as less violating of the victim's rights and less psychologically damaging. Women tended to have more egalitarian attitudes than men did, and women were less likely to minimize the severity of the rape in the measures of perceptions of the situation and the appropriate punishment.

Keywords

gender role attitudes victim–perpetrator acquaintance rape perceptions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acock, A. C., & Ireland, N. K. (1983). Attribution of blame in rape cases: The impact of norm violation, gender, and sex-role attitude. Sex Roles, 9, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allegier, E. R., & McCormick, N. B. (1983). Changing boundaries: Gender role and sex behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  3. Association of Rape Crisis Centers in Israel. (2002). A report on sexual violence in Isreal in 2002. Jerusalem, Israel: A.R.C.C.I.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, N. J., & Feild, H. S. (1977). Sex differences in university students' attitudes toward rape. College Student Personnel, 18, 93–96.Google Scholar
  5. Beere, C. A., King, D. W., Beere, D. B., & King, L. A. (1984). Sex-Role Egalitarianism Scale: A measure of attitudes toward equality between the sexes. Sex Roles, 10, 563–576.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, S. T., Kuriloff, P. J., & Lottes, I. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification, and students' perception of rape victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1719–1734.Google Scholar
  7. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bogoch, B. R., & Don-Yechiya, R. (2000). The gender of justice: Bias against women in Israeli courts. Jerusalem, Israel: The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies.Google Scholar
  9. Bridges, J. S. (1991). Perceptions of date rape and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs. Sex Roles, 24, 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bridges, J. S., & McGrail, C. A. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for date and stranger rape. Sex Roles, 21, 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Man, women, and rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  12. Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Caron, S. L., & Carter, D. B. (1997). The relationships among sex role orientation, egalitarianism, attitudes toward sexuality, and attitudes toward violence against women. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 568–587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costin, F., & Schwarz, N. (1987). Beliefs about rape and women's social roles: A four-nation study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 46–56.Google Scholar
  16. Cowan, G., (2000). Beliefs about the causes of four types of rape. Sex-Roles, 42, 807–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ewoldt, C. A., Monson, C. M., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2000). Attributions about rape in a continuum of dissolving marital {relationship.} Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1175–1183.Google Scholar
  18. Feild, H. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 156–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feldman-Summers, S., & Lindner, K. (1976). Perceptions of victims and defendants in criminal assault cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 3, 135–150.Google Scholar
  20. Ferguson, P. A., Duthie, D. A., & Graf, R. G. (1987). Attribution of responsibility to rapist and victim: The influence of victim's attractiveness and rape-related information. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 243–250.Google Scholar
  21. Freetly, A. J. H., & Kane, E. W. (1995). Men's and women's perceptions of non-consensual sexual intercourse. Sex Roles, 33, 785–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Groth, A. N., Burgess, A. W., & Holmstrom, L. L. (1977). Rape: Power, anger, and sexuality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 1239–1243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones, C., & Anderson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415–419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, B. E., Kuck, D. L., & Schander, P. R. (1997). Rape myth acceptance and sociodemographic characteristics: A multidimensional analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 693–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kanekar, S., & Nazareth, A. M. (1988). Attributed rape victim's fault as a function of her attractiveness, physical hurt and emotional disturbance. Social Behavior, 3, 37–40.Google Scholar
  26. King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1985). Sex-Role egalitarianism: Biological and personality correlates. Psychological Reports, 57, 787–792.Google Scholar
  27. King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1990). Abbreviated measures of sex role egalitarian attitudes. Sex Roles, 23, 659–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1997). Sex-Role Egalitarianism Scale: Development, psychometric properties and recommendations for future research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 71–87.Google Scholar
  29. Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., Seibel, C. A., & Cox, S. L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim's experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1–24.Google Scholar
  30. Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  31. L'Armand, K., & Pepitone, A. (1982). Judgment of rape: A study of victim–rapist relationship and victim sexual history. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 134–139.Google Scholar
  32. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.Google Scholar
  33. Mason, K. O., & Lu, Y. (1988). Attitudes toward women's familial roles: Changes in the United States 1997–1985. Gender and Society, 2, 39–57.Google Scholar
  34. McHugh, M. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1997). The measurements of gender role attitudes: A review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 1–16.Google Scholar
  35. Merrell, J. L. (1997). The effects of gender role attitudes, participant gender, and situational factors on attitudes toward marital rape and sexual obligation. Dissertation Abstract International, 59(3B), 1373.Google Scholar
  36. Monson, C. M., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., & Biderup, T. (2000). Does “no” really mean “no” after you say “yes”?: Attributions about date and marital rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1156–1174.Google Scholar
  37. Rice, T. W., & Coates, D. L. (1995). Gender role attitudes in the southern United States. Gender and Society, 9, 738–750.Google Scholar
  38. Russell, D. E. H., (1984). Sexual exploitations: Rape, child sexual abuse, and workplace harassment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Sanchez, D. M. (1997). The relationship between attitudes towards women, rape myth acceptance and perceptions of marital versus stranger rape. Dissertation Abstract International, 58(3B), 1545.Google Scholar
  40. Schwarz, N., & Brand, J. F. (1983). Effects of salience of rape on sex role attitudes, trust, and self-esteem in non-raped women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 71–76.Google Scholar
  41. Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. (1983). Just because she doesn't want to doesn't mean it's rape: An experimentally based casual model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 220–232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. (1992). Sexual precedence reduces the perceived legitimacy of sexual refusal: An examination of attributions concerning date rape and consensual sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 756–764.Google Scholar
  43. Simonson, K., & Subich, L. M. (1999). Rape perceptions as a function of gender-role traditionality and victim–perpetrator association. Sex Roles, 40, 617–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Suzuki, A. (1991). Egalitarian sex role attitudes: Scale development and comparison of American and Japanese Women. Sex Roles, 24, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tetreault, P. A., & Barnett, M. A. (1987). Reactions to stranger and acquaintance rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 353–358.Google Scholar
  46. Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Masser, B. (2004). Evaluating stranger rape and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 295–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ward, C. A. (1995) Attitudes towards rape: Feminist and social psychological perspectives. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Wolf, Y., Ron, N., & Wolters, J. (1996). Modularity in normal judgement by police officers. Policing and Society, 6, 37–52.Google Scholar
  49. Yescavage, K. (1999). Teaching women a lesson: Sexually aggressive and sexually nonaggressive men's perceptions of acquaintance and date rape. Violence Against Women, 5, 796–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CriminologyBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations