Skip to main content

Young Women's Dating Behavior: Why/Why Not Date a Nice Guy?

Sex Roles volume 53, pages 347–359 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate why some women report a desire to date nice guys but prefer dating jerks. Specifically, young women's dating choices based on their reasons for dating in general and the attractive/unattractive traits that they perceive that a man possesses were explored. Popular texts offer evidence that young women may/may not select nice guys as dating partners because nice guys may/may not be able to provide them with what they want from their dating experiences. Scholarly texts offer evidence that the answer may lie in how the young woman perceives the nice guy—does he possess attractive or unattractive personality traits? The results of the present study suggest that reasons for dating (i.e., not wanting physical contact, wanting stimulating conversation, and wanting an exclusive relationship) and perceived personality traits (i.e., sweet/nice and physically attractive) influence a young woman's desire to date a nice guy, and that perceived personality traits are better predictors of her choice of a man to date than are reasons for dating.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Alder, R. B., & Rodman, G. (2003). Understanding human communication (8th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, L. A., & Bullis, C. (1986). Turning points in developing romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 12, 469–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beland, N. (March 2003). The ultimate guide to the girl next door. Men's Health, 18, 132–140. Retrieved November 7, 2003, from EBSCOHost databases.

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, C., & Kinder, M. (1985). Smart women, foolish choices: Finding the right men, avoiding the wrong ones. New York: Signet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, S. (1995). What types of men are most attractive and most repulsive to women. Sex Roles, 32, 375–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doosje, B., Rojahn, K., & Fischer, A. (1999). Partner preferences as a function of gender, age, political orientation, and level of education. Sex Roles, 40, 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felmlee, D. H. (2001). From appealing to appalling: Disenchantment with a romantic partner. Sociological Perspectives, 44, 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (1997). Mars and Venus on a date: A guide for navigating the 5 stages of dating to create a loving and lasting relationship. New York: HarperPaperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy in a Trenchcoat. (2002). The myth of “the nice guy. Overthelimit.com. Retrieved November 7, 2003, from http://www.overthelimit.com/article/367/_the_myth_of_”the_nice_guy”.html

  • Herold, E. S., & Milhausen, R. R. (1999). Dating preferences of university women: An analysis of the nice guy stereotype. Journal of Sex and Marriage Therapy, 25, 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Graziano, W. G., & West, S. G. (1995). Dominance, prosocial orientation, and female preferences: Do nice guys really finish last? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 427–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. (1984). Interpersonal communication and human relationships. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuriansky, J. (1996). The complete idiot's guide to dating. New York: Alpha Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (2000). Dating scripts revisited. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 488–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing their tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947–955.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., & Gould, J. (2001). Date like a man: What men know about dating and are afraid you'll find out. New York: Quill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nice guys vs. jerks. (2003). Retrieved November 7, 2003, from http://www.sosuave.com/women1.htm

  • Regan, P. C. (1998a). Minimum mate selection standards as a function of perceived mate value, relationship context, and gender. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 10, 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, P. C. (1998b). What if you can't get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of mate value and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1294–1303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., Couden, A., & Baker, M. (2001). The effects of sex and temporal context on feelings of romantic desire: An experimental evaluation of sexual strategies theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 833–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J., & Nagy, G. F. (1979). Probability of acceptance in dating choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 522–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speed, A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1997). Romantic popularity and mate preferences: A peer nomination study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 928–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, S., Stinnett, H., & Rosenfeld, L. B. (2000). Sex differences in desired characteristics of short-term and long-term relationship partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 843–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbaniak, G. C., & Kilmann, P. R. (2003). Physical attractiveness and the “nice guy paradox:” Do nice guys really finish last? Sex Roles, 49, 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. (1999). The wet spot: Why don't women date nice guys? Retrieved November 7, 2003, from http://www.pottymouth.org/wetspot/wetspot014.html

  • Wills, R. (2000). Nice guys and players: Becoming the man women want. Arlington, VA: E.R.L. Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication Studies, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, 601 South College Road, Wilmington, North Carolina, 28403-5933

    Anita K. McDaniel

Authors
  1. Anita K. McDaniel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita K. McDaniel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDaniel, A.K. Young Women's Dating Behavior: Why/Why Not Date a Nice Guy?. Sex Roles 53, 347–359 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-6758-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-6758-z

Keywords

  • nice guy
  • women
  • dating behavior
  • reasons
  • traits