Sex Roles

, Volume 53, Issue 1–2, pp 67–77 | Cite as

The Effects of Subtle Sexual Harassment on Women’s Performance in a Job Interview

Abstract

Although we now know about the long-term consequences of moderate to severe sexual harassment, little is known about the immediate effects of more subtle harassment. The present study was designed to examine real-time consequences of subtle sexual harassment in a job interview using objective indicators of job performance. Fifty women were recruited for a job interview. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two interview conditions during which they were asked either three sexual or non-sexual questions interspersed with standard interview questions. In the former, women applicants spoke less fluently, gave lower quality answers, and asked fewer job relevant questions than did those in the non-sexual interview. It thus appears that even relatively mild harassment disrupts immediate performance.

Key Words

sexual harassment performance interview 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arvey, R. D. (1979). Unfair discrimination in the employment interview: Legal and psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 736–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barling, J., Rogers, A. G., & Kelloway, E. K. (2001). Behind closed doors: In-home workers’ experience of sexual harassment and workplace violence. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 255–269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.Google Scholar
  6. Collinson, D. L., & Collinson, M. (1989). Sexuality in the workplace: The domination of men’s sexuality. In J. Hearn & D. L. Sheppard (Eds.), The sexuality of organizations (pp. 91–109). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Conte, A. (1997). Legal theories of sexual harassment. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 50–83). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  8. Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371–386.Google Scholar
  10. Crull, P. (1982). Stress effects of sexual harassment on the job: Implications for counseling. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 539–544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dansky, B. S., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (1997). Effects of sexual harassment. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 152–174). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Du Bois, J. W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1980). Title 29—Labor, Chap XIV, Part 1604, Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Sex under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as Amended Adoption of Interim Interpretive Guideline. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  14. Faley, R. H., Knapp, D. E., Kustis, G. A., & Dubois, C. L. Z. (1999). Estimating the organizational costs of sexual harassment: The case of the U.S. army. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 461–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fear, R. A., & Chiron, R. J. (1990). The evaluation interview (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 425–445.Google Scholar
  18. Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Magley, V. J. (1997). But was it really sexual harassment?: Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 5–28). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  19. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.Google Scholar
  20. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Glomb, T. M., Munson, L. J., Hulin, C. L., Bergman, M. E., & Drasgow, F. (1999). Structural equation models of sexual harassment: Longitudinal explorations and cross-sectional generalizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 14–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gosselin, H. L. (1986). Sexual harassment on the job: Psychological, social, and economic repercussions. Canadian Mental Health, 32, 21–24.Google Scholar
  23. Gruber, J. E. (1992). A typology of personal and environmental sexual harassment: Research and policy implications for the 1990s. Sex Roles, 26, 447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gruber, J. E., & Bjorn, L. (1982). Blue-collar blues: The sexual harassment of women autoworkers. Work and Occupations, 9, 271–298.Google Scholar
  25. Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace: Impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Hanisch, K. A., & Hulin, C. L. (1991). General attitudes and organizational withdrawal: An evaluation of a causal model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39, 110–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensen, I., & Gutek, B. (1982). Attributions and assignment of responsibility for sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 38 (4), 121–136.Google Scholar
  28. Livingston, J. A. (1982). Responses to sexual harassment on the job: Legal, organizational, and individual actions. Journal of Social Issues, 38 (4), 5–22.Google Scholar
  29. Magley, V. J., Hulin, C. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & DeNardo, M. (1999). Outcomes of self-labeling sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 390–402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Magley, V. J., Waldo, C. R., Drasgow, F., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). The impact of sexual harassment on military personnel: Is it the same for men and women? Military Psychology, 11, 283–302.Google Scholar
  31. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson. (1986). 477 U.S. 57, 40 FEP Case 1822.Google Scholar
  32. Olian, J. D., Schwab, D. P., & Haberfeld, Y. (1988). The impact of applicant gender compared to qualifications on hiring recommendations: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 41, 180–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Piotrkowski, C. S. (1998). Gender harassment, job satisfaction, and distress among employed white and minority women. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 33–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards. (1991). 760 F. Supp. 1486 (M.D. Fla.).Google Scholar
  35. Satterfield, A. T., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1997). Shaken confidence: The effects of an authority figure’s flirtatiousness on women’s and men’s self-rated creativity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 395–416.Google Scholar
  36. Schneider, K. T., Swan, S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 401–415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Schneider, K. T., Tomaka, J., & Palacios, R. (2001). Women’s cognitive, affective, and physiological reactions to a male coworker’s sexist behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1995–2018.Google Scholar
  38. Schultz, V. (1998). Reconceptualizing sexual harassment. The Yale Law Journal, 107, 1683–1805.Google Scholar
  39. Sczesny, S., & Stahlberg, D. (2000). Sexual harassment over the telephone: Occupational risk to call centres. Work and Stress, 14, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scott v. Sears, Roebuck, & Co. (1986). 605 F Supp. 1047.Google Scholar
  41. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Stockdale, M. S. (1998). The direct and moderating influences of sexual harassment pervasiveness, coping strategies, and gender on work-related outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 521–535.Google Scholar
  43. Till, F. J. (1980). Sexual harassment: A report on the sexual harassment of students. Washington, DC: National Advisory Council on Women’s Educational Program.Google Scholar
  44. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB). (1981). Sexual harassment of federal workers: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  45. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB). (1987). Sexual harassment of federal workers: An update. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  46. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of a brief measure of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1071.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWashington and Lee UniversityLexington
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyYale UniversityNew Haven
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyWashington and Lee University Lexington

Personalised recommendations