Sex Roles

, Volume 52, Issue 11–12, pp 771–784 | Cite as

Patterns of Violent Relationships, Psychological Distress, and Marital Satisfaction in a National Sample of Men and Women

  • Stacey L. WilliamsEmail author
  • Irene Hanson Frieze


This paper examined six patterns of violent relationships (severe and mild victimization, perpetration, and mutual violence) and their associations with psychosocial outcomes in men and women (N = 3,519) using data from the National Comorbidity Survey. Violence patterns most frequently reported included mild and severe violence performed by both relationship partners. Some gender differences in frequency of patterns emerged. Main results showed gender differences and some similarities in associations between violence patterns and negative psychosocial outcomes. Women’s victimization, regardless of severity, was more strongly related to psychosocial outcomes than men’s. Yet, additional findings revealed gender similarities, with both men and women affected by mutual violence. Post hoc analyses further suggested that some individuals were satisfied and had relatively low distress, despite violence.


violence distress satisfaction gender relationships 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Almeida, D. M., & Kessler, R. C. (1998). Everyday stressors and gender differences in daily distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 670–680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, K. L. (2002). Perpetrator or victim? Relationships between intimate partner violence and well-being. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 851–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Astin, S., Redston, P., & Campbell, A. (2003). Sex differences in social representations of aggression: Men justify, women excuse? Aggressive Behavior, 29, 128–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borochowitz, D. Y., & Eisikovits, Z. (2002). To love violently: Strategies for reconciling love and violence. Violence Against Women, 8, 476–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Browne, A. (1993). Violence against women by male partners: Prevalence, outcomes, and policy implications. American Psychologist, 48, 1077–1087.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, M. C., Matthews, K. A., & Twamley, E. W. (1999). Is life more difficult on Mars or Venus? A meta-analytic review of sex differences in major and minor life events. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 83–97.Google Scholar
  8. Felson, R. B. (2002). Violence & gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  9. Frieze, I. H. (2005). Hurting the one you love: Violence in relationships. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  10. Frieze, I. H., & Browne, A. (1989). Violence in marriage. In L. Ohlin & M. Tonry (Eds.), Family Violence. (163–218). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Frieze, I. H., Hymer, S., & Greenberg, M. S. (1987). Describing the crime victim: Psychological reactions to victimization. Professional Psychology: Research and practice, 318, 299–315.Google Scholar
  12. Golding, J. M. (1999). Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 99–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodman, L., Koss, M. P., & Russo, N. F. (1993). Violence against women: Physical and mental health effects: II. Research findings. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 2, 79–89.Google Scholar
  14. Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2003). Physical aggression and control in heterosexual relationships: The effect of sampling. Violence and Victims, 18, 181–196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Janoff-Bulman, R., & Frieze, I. H. (1983). A theoretical perspective for understanding reactions to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 1–17.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 75, 283–294.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, M. P. (2001). Conflict and control: Symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, et al. (Eds.), Couples in Conflict (pp. 95–104). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Katz, J., Kuffel, S. W., & Coblentz, A. (2002). Are there gender differences in sustaining dating violence?: An examination of frequency, severity, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 17, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kessler, R. C. (2000). Gender differences in major depression: Epidemiological findings. In E. Frank (Ed.), Gender and Its Effects on Psychopathology (pp. 61–84). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Kessler, R. C., McGonagle, K. A., Zhao, S., Nelson, C. B., Hughes, M., Eshleman, S., Wittchen, H.-U., & Kendler, K. S. (1994). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 8–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kimmel, M. S. (2002). ‘Gender symmetry’ in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Schlee, K. A., Monson, C. M., Ehrensaft, M., & Heyman, R. (1998). What’s love got to do with it?: Perceptions of marital positivity in H-to-W aggressive, distressed, and happy marriages. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawrence, E., & Bradbury, T. N. (2001). Physical aggression and marital dysfunction: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 135–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Marshall, L. L. (1999). Effects of men’s subtle and overt psychological abuse on low-income women. Violence and Victims, 14, 69–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Migliaccio, T. A. (2002). Abused husbands: A narrative analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 26–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Olson, L. N. (2002). Exploring “common couple violence” in heterosexual romantic relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 66, 104–128.Google Scholar
  27. Pagelow, M. D. (1981). Women-battering: Victims and their experiences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Pagelow, M. D. (1984). Family violence. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  29. Plichta, S. B. (1996). Violence and abuse: Implications for women’s health. In M. M. Falik & K. S. Collins (Eds.), Women’s Health: The Commonwealth Fund Survey (pp. 237–272). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Resnick, H. S., Acierno, R., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (1997). Health impact of interpersonal violence: II. Medical and mental health outcomes. Behavioral Medicine, 23, 65–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenbaum, A., Geffner, R., & Benjamin, S. (1997). A biopsychosocial model for understanding relationship aggression. In R. Geffner, S. B. Sorenson, & P. K. Lundberg-Love (Eds.), Violence and sexual abuse at home: Current issues in spousal battering and child maltreatment (pp. 57–79). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rust, K. (1985). Variance estimation for complex estimators in sample surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 1, 381–397.Google Scholar
  34. Sinclair, H. C., & Frieze, I. H. (2002). Initial courtship behavior and stalking: How should we draw the line? In K. E. Davis & I. H. Frieze (Eds.), Stalking: Perspectives on victims and perpetrators (pp. 186–211). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.Google Scholar
  36. Straus, M. A. (1999). The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science analysis. In X. B. Arriaga & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence in Intimate Relationships (pp. 17–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1988). How violent are American families? Estimate from the National Family Violence Resurvey and other studies. In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kirkpatrick, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Family abuse and its consequences: New directions in research (pp. 14–36). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Swan, S. C., & Snow, D. L. (2003). Behavioral and psychological differences among abused women who use violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 9, 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Testa, M., & Leonard, K. E. (2001). The impact of marital aggression on women’s psychological and marital functioning in a newlywed sample. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 115–130.Google Scholar
  40. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women. Findings from the National Violence Against Women survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  42. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1992). National Health Interview Survey, 1989 (Computer file). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  43. Vivian, D., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1994). Are bi-directionally violent couples mutually victimized? A gender-sensitive comparison. Violence and Victims, 9, 107–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  45. White, J. W., & Kowalski, R. M. (1998). Violence against women: An integrative perspective. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Perspectives on Human Aggression. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  46. White, J. W., Smith, P. H., Koss, M. P., & Figueredo, A. J. (2000). Intimate Partner Aggression: What Have We Learned? Commentary on Archer’s Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 690–696.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Williams, S. L., & Mickelson, K. D. (2004). The nexus of domestic violence and poverty: Resilience in women’s anxiety. Violence Against Women, 10, 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  2. 2.University of PittsburghPittsburgh
  3. 3.Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations